과제정보
This work is funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) with the grant number 1501540 on the basis of a decision by the German Bundestag.
참고문헌
- OECD, Proceedings of the OECD/NEA/CSNI Specialist Meeting on Boron Dilution Reactivity Transients. Comitee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, vol. 96, NEA/CSNI/R, State College, PA, USA, 1995, p. 3.
- S. Kliem, U. Rohde, F. Weiss, Core response of a PWR to a slug of under-borated water, Nucl. Eng. Des. 230 (2004) 121-132, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2003.11.021.
- S. Kliem, R. Franz, OECD PKL2 Project - Final Report on the ROCOM Tests, Insitute Report HZDR\FWO\2012\03, 2012.
- S. Kliem, R. Franz, OECD PKL3 Project - Final Report on the ROCOM Tests, Insitute Report HZDR\FWO\2016\01, 2016.
- U. Rohde, S. Kliem, B. Hemstrom, T. Toppila, Y. Bezrukov, The European project FLOMIX-R: description of the slug mixing and buoyancy related experimens at the different test facilities, Final report on WP2. Technical Report FZR-430, http://www.fzd.de/publications/007459/7459.pdf, 2005.
- S. Kliem, H.M. Prasser, T. Suhnel, F.P. Weiss, A. Hansen, Experimental determination of the boron concentration distribution in the primary circuit of a PWR after a postulated cold leg small break loss-of-coolant-accident with cold leg safety injection, Nucl. Eng. Des. 238 (2008) 1788-1801, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.10.016.
- H. Prasser, G. Grunwald, T. Hohne, S. Kliem, U. Rohde, F. Weiss, Coolant mixing in a pressurized water Reactor : deboration transients, steam-line breaks, and emergency core cooling injection, Nucl. Technol. 143 (2003) 37-56, https://doi.org/10.13182/NT03-A3396.
- T. Hohne, S. Kliem, U. Rohde, F.P. Weiss, Boron dilution transients during natural circulation flow in PWR-Experiments and CFD simulations, Nucl. Eng. Des. 238 (2008) 1987-1995, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.10.032.
- T. Hohne, S. Kliem, U. Bieder, Modeling of a buoyancy-driven flow experiment at the ROCOM test facility using the CFD codes CFX-5 and Trio_U, Nucl. Eng. Des. 236 (2006) 1309-1325, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.12.005.
- A. Schaffrath, K.C. Fischer, T. Hahm, S. Wussow, Validation of the CFD code fluent by post-test calculation of a density-driven ROCOM experiment, Nucl. Eng. Des. 237 (2007) 1899-1908, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.029.
- A. Grahn, E. Diaz Pescador, S. Kliem, F. Schafer, T. Hohne, Modelling of complex boron dilution transients in PWRs - validation of CFD simulation with ANSYS CFX against the ROCOM E2 . 3 experiment, Nucl. Eng. Des. 372 (2021) 110938, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110938.
- B.L. Smith, M. Andreani, U. Bieder, F. Ducros, E. Graffard, M. Heitsch, M. Henriksson, T. Hohne, M. Houkema, E. Komen, J. Mahaffy, F. Menter, F. Moretti, T. Morii, P. Muhlbauer, U. Rohde, M. Scheuerer, C.-H. Song, T. Watanabe, G. Zigh, Assessment of CFD Codes for Nuclear Reactor Safety Problems, vol. 12, NEA/CSNI/R, 2014, pp. 1-226, 2014.
- J. Mahaffy, B. Chung, F. Dubois, F. Ducros, E. Graffard, M. Heitsch, M. Henriksson, E. Komen, F. Moretti, T. Morii, P. Muhlbauer, U. Rohde, M. Scheuerer, B.L. Smith, C. Song, T. Watanabe, G. Zigh, Best Practice Guidelines for the Use of CFD in Nuclear Reactor Safety Applications, vol. 11, NEA/CSNI/R, 2014, pp. 1-176, 2014.
- H. Austregesilo, C. Bals, A. Hora, G. Lerchl, P. Romstedt, P. Schoffel, D. Von der Cron, F. Weyermann, ATHLET Mod. 3.1 cycle A, models and methods, GRS-P-13 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55663-3_2. Rev. 4.
- D. Bestion, System thermalhydraulics for design basis accident analysis and simulation : status of tools and methods and direction for future R & D, Nucl. Eng. Des. 312 (2017) 12-29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.11.010.
- P. Pandazis, S.C. Ceuca, P.J. Schoeffel, H.V. Hristov, Investigation of Multidimensional flow mixing phenomena in the reactor pressure vessel with the system code ATHLET, Nureth-16 (2015) 3378-3391.
- A. Bousbia Salah, J. Vlassenbroeck, Assessment of the CATHARE 3D capabilities in predicting the temperature mixing under asymmetric buoyant driven flow conditions, Nucl. Eng. Des. 265 (2013) 469-483, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.09.016.
- E. Diaz Pescador, F. Schafer, S. Kliem, Thermal-hydraulic insights during a main steam line break in a generic PWR KONVOI reactor with ATHLET 3.1A, Kerntechnik 84 (2019) 367-374, https://doi.org/10.3139/124.190008.
- E. Diaz Pescador, A. Grahn, S. Kliem, F. Schafer, T. Hohne, Advanced modelling of complex boron dilution transients in PWRs - validation of ATHLET 3D-Module against the experiment ROCOM E2 . 3, Nucl. Eng. Des. 367 (2020) 110776, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110776.
- OECD/NEA, Assessment of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for Nuclear Reactor Safety Problems, vol. 13, NEA/CSNI/R, 2007, p. 2008.
- A. Bousbia Salah, S.C. Ceuca, R. Puragliesi, R. Mukin, A. Grahn, S. Kliem, J. Vlassenbroeck, H. Austregesilo, Unsteady single-phase natural-circulation flow mixing prediction using 3-D thermal-hydraulic system and CFD codes, Nucl. Technol. 203 (2018) 293-314, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1461517.
- C. Demaziere, V.H. Sanchez-Espinoza, B. Chanaron, Advanced numerical simulation and modelling for reactor safety - contributions from the CORTEX, HPMC, McSAFE and NURESAFE projects, EPJ Nucl. Sci. Technol. 6 (2020) 42, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2019006.
- L. Dennhardt, PKL III G3.1 Test Report, Areva NP GmbH, 2011. PTCTP-G/2011/En/0009, Rev. A.
- K. Umminger, R. Mandl, R. Wegner, Restart of natural circulation in a PWR - PKL test results and S-RELAP 5 calculations, Nucl. Eng. Des. 215 (2002) 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00040-7