References
- Anderson, L. (2010). Embedded, emboldened, and (net)working for change: Support-seeking and teacher agency in urban, high-needs schools. Harvard Educational Review, 80, 541-586. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.80.4.f2v8251444581105
- Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin'! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 187-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530044
- Basu, S. J. (2008). How students design and enact physics lessons: Five immigrant Caribbean youth and the cultivation of student voice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 881-899. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20257
- Basu, S. J., Barton, A. C., Clairmont, N., & Locke, D. (2009). Developing a framework for critical science agency through case study in a conceptual physics context. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(2), 345-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9135-8
- Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20420
- Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
- Cho, Y. D. (2001). Understanding Korean secondary school classroom classes. Seoul, Korea: Company of Education and Science.
- Clement, J. J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism. In G. Glover & R. Ronning, C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Assessment, theory and research (pp. 341-381). New York: Plenum.
- Clement, J. J. (2008). Student/teacher co-construction of visualizable models
- Damsa, C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508401003708381
- Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
- Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A.(1998) What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962-1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
- Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explainingan emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
- Goulart, M. I., & Roth, W. M. (2010). Engaging young children in collective curriculum design. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 553-562.
- Han, M. H. (2018). Role of Epistemic Affect in Elementary School Students' Scientific Modeling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Korea.
- Han, M. H., Kim, H, -B. (2012). Elementary Student's Reasoning Patterns Represented in Constructing Models of "Food Web and Food Pyramid". Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 71-83.
- Han, M. H., Kim, H, -B. (2017). Elementary Students' Cognitive-Emotional Rebuttals in Their Modeling Activity: Focusing on Epistemic Affect. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 37(1), 155-168.
- Harris, E. M., & Ballard, H. L. (2021). Examining student environmental science agency across school science contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
- Holland, D. (1998). Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2009). Social practice theory and historical productions of persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3895/actio.v2n3.7536
- Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Engaging in science: A feeling for the discipline. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 156-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1088441
- Jang, E. K., Ko, W., & Kang, S. J. (2012). The analysis of university student's modeling patterns and perceptions through modeling experiments. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.1.001
- Jeon, E. (2021). Exploring Students' Epistemic Agency Expressed in Collaborative Scientific Modeling. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Korea.
- Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modeling, teachers' views on the nature of modeling, and implications for the education of modelers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110110142
- Ke, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2021). Supporting students' meaningful engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages: A case study of contrasting teaching approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 335-365. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21662
- Kim, H., Kim, H. -B., Kang, E. (2015). Expression of Students' Agency in an Elementary School Science Class: A Focus on Teaching and Learning Contexts. Biology Education, 43(3), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2015.43.3.289
- Ko, M. L. M., & Krist, C. (2019). Opening up curricula to redistribute epistemic agency: A framework for supporting science teaching. Science Education, 103(4), 979-1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21511
- Lee, C. -E., & Kim, H. -B. (2016). Understanding the Role of Wonderment Questions Related to Activation of Conceptual Resources in Scientific Model Construction: Focusing on Students' Epistemological Framing and Positional Framing. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(3), 471-483. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0471
- Lee, K. H., Yun, S. -M., Kim, H. -B. (2012). Understanding of Middle School Students' Small Group Argumentation of Plant and Animal Classification: Focusing on the Effects of Leader. Biology Education, 40(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.1.71
- Lee, M., & Kim, H. -B. (2019). Key Stages of a Research and Students' Epistemic Agency in a Student-Driven R&E. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 39(4), 511-523.
- Lee, S., & Kim, H. -B. (2017). Exploring Secondary Students' Dialogic Argumentation Regarding Excretion via Collaborative Modeling. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 37(6), 1037-1049.
- Lee, S., Park, S. -H., Kim, H. -B. (2016). Exploring Secondary Students' Progression in Group Norms and Argumentation Competency through Collaborative Reflection about Small Group Argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(6), 895-910. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.6.0895
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and science literacy. In W. Damon, R. Lerner, K. A.Renninger, & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology in practice (6th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 153-196). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Lim, S. -E., Choe, S. -U., Park, C., Kim, C. -J. (2020). Exploring the Influence of an Explicit and Reflective Modeling Instruction on Elementary Students' Metamodeling Knowledge. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 40(2), 127-140.
- Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D., & Berland, L. (2018). Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1053-1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21459
- Ministry of Education (2015). Science curriculum. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education.
- National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts,and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework of New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The NationalAcademies Press.
- NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Noh, T., Kim, Y., Han, S., Kang, S. (2002). Reserch Article : Elementary School Students' Views on the Nature of Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(4), 882-891.
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Education Working Papers.
- Paris, C., & Lung, P. (2008). Agency, and child-centered practices in novice teachers: Autonomy, efficacy, intentionality, and reflectivity. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 29, 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901020802275302
- Park, S. -H., Lee, S., Kim, H. -B. (2014). Exploring Middle School Students' Metacognitive Development via Collaborative Reflection of Small-Group Argumentation in Science Classroom. Biology Education, 42(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2014.42.1.1
- Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta(Eds.). Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice(pp. 187-206). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
- Rea-Ramirez, M. A., Clement, J., & Nunez-Oviedo, M. C. (2008). An instructional model derived from model construction and criticism theory. In Model based learning and instruction in science (pp. 23-43). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839-858. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199610)33:8<839::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X
- Sandoval, W. A., Bell, P., Coleman, E. B., Enyedy, N., & Suthers, D. D. (2000). Designing Knowledge Representations for Learning Epistemic Practices of Science.
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37-68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0101_3
- Schenkel, K., & Barton, A. C. (2020). Critical science agency and power hierarchies: Restructuring power within groups to address injustice beyond them. Science Education, 104(3), 500-529. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21564
- Schenkel, K., Barton, A. C., Tan, E., Nazar, C. R., & Flores, M. D. G. D. (2019). Framing equity through a closer examination of critical science agency. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(2), 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09914-1
- Sharma, A. (2008). Making (electrical) connections: Exploring student agency in a school in India. Science Education, 92(2), 297-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20246
- Shim, S. -Y. (2015). Shift in epistemological framing of small group students during their social construction of scientific models. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Korea.
- Shultz, J. J., Florio, S., & Erickson, F. (1982). Aspects of the cultural organization of social relationships in communication at home and in school. Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education, 88-123.
- Song, H., Kim, H. -B. (2020). Distributed Leadership in Small Group during Scientific Modeling. Biology Education, 48(2), 168-187. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2020.48.2.168
- Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn scienceas-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487-516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21112
- Stroupe, D., Caballero, M. D., & White, P. (2018). Fostering students' epistemic agency through the co-configuration of moth research. Science Education, 102(6), 1176-1200. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21469
- Uhm, J., Kim, H. -B. (2020). Changes in Teaching Practices of Elementary School Teachers in Scientific Modeling Classes: Focused on Modeling Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK). Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 40(5), 543-563.
- Wegerif, R., Li, L., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2015). The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking. Routledge.
- Wray, K. A., & Richmond, G. (2018). Factors shaping the agency of beginning science teachers working in high-poverty schools. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(8), 785-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2018.1514824
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Yoo, Y. J., Oh, P. S. (2016). Effects of Modeling-Based Science Inquiry Instruction on Elementary Students' Learning in the Unit of Seasonal Changes. Elementary Science Education, 35(2), 265-276.
- Zimmerman, H. T., & Weible, J. L. (2018). Epistemic agency in an environmental sciences watershed investigation fostered by digital photography. International Journal of Science Education, 40(8), 894-918. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1455115
- Zivic, A., Smith, J. F., Reiser, B., Edwards, K., Novak, M., & McGill, T. (2018). Negotiating Epistemic Agency and Target Learning Goals: Supporting Coherence from the Students' Perspective. In Kay, J. and Luckin, R. (Eds.) Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: Making the Learning Sciences Count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018, Volume 1. (pp. 25-32). London, UK: International Society of the Learning Sciences.