한국비블리아학회지 (Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science)

한국비블리아학회 (Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

증거로서 신뢰할 수 있는 전자기록의 품질 확보방안 연구 - 기록관리영역과 사법영역에서 다루는 기록과 증거의 품질 개념과 요건 분석을 중심으로 -

A Study on Securing the Quality of Trusted Digital Records as Evidence: Focusing on Analysis of Quality Concept and Requirements for Records and Evidence Respectively Covered in Records Management and Judicial Domain

  • 이젬마 (행정안전부 국가기록원) ;
  • 오경묵 (숙명여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.08.16
  • 심사 : 2021.08.28
  • 발행 : 2021.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 전자기록의 신뢰체계 확보를 위해 증거로서 신뢰할 수 있는 전자기록의 품질 개념을 분석하고 기록관리 영역과 사법영역의 요건을 비교·분석하여 증거력 확보 방안 마련에 필요한 시사점을 도출하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 기록관리 절차, 기록 메타데이터, 기록시스템의 요건, 공공기록물법령을 상호 연계하고 사법영역의 요건을 비교하여 기록관리 영역에서 요구되는 요건을 조사·분석하였고, 전자기록과 디지털 증거의 품질개념간 관계 분석을 통해 법적 증거력 확보를 위해 기록 생산 및 획득 단계에서 기록의 신뢰성 확보를 위한 조치가 요구된다는 점을 도출하였다. 또한, 디지털 증거의 진정성 입증은 전자기록의 진본성 입증과 밀접한 관련성을 가지므로 진본성 입증을 위한 기록 프로세스와 기록 메타데이터, 기록시스템이 가지는 중요성과 이를 위한 조치의 필요성을 제시하였다.

This study aimed to analyze the quality concepts and requirements of digital records as evidence and to find an implication to develop requirements for trusted digital records with securing authoritative qualities. To this end, this study compared requirements of records domain linking records process, records metadata and records systems with judicial domain on digital evidence, and identified the records requirements to secure the legal admissibility linking records and judicial domain. This study analyzed the relationship of quality concepts between digital records and digital evidence, found the legal admissibility is highly related to the reliability, and derived that it needs the measure to secure the reliability at the stage of records creation and capture. To prove authenticity of digital evidence, this study identified importance of records process, records metadata and records system, and proposed the necessity of measurement to secure records' evidence.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, Y. M. (2018). Archival Analysis on Requirements for Admissibility of Evidence of Electronic Records. Master's thesis, PUSAN National University, Korea.
  2. Criminal Procedure Act. No. 17572.
  3. Enforcement Degree of the Public Records Management Act. No. 31380.
  4. Judicial Policy Research Institute (2015). Research on Determining the Admissibility of Digital Evidence.
  5. Law Dictionary (2021, January 15). Hearsay Evidence. Available: https://terms.naver.com/entry.naver?docId=3654451&cid=42131&categoryId=42131
  6. Lee, K. (2019). A study on authentication model using blockchain. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 59, 47-79. http://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.59.047
  7. Lee, S. & Seol, M. (2017). A study of redesigning electronic records management policies. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 52, 5-37. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2017.52.005
  8. Lee, S. W. (2012). Electronic evidence and best evidence rule. Contemporary Review of Criminal Law, 36, 50-104. https://doi.org/10.23026/crclps.2012..36.002
  9. Lee, S. Y. (2017). The Admissibility of Digital Evidence. The Justice, 161, 164-199.
  10. Lee, Y. J. & Lee, S. Y. (2009). A policy framework for the long-term preservation of authentic digital records: based on InterPARES studies. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 19, 193-249.
  11. Public Records Management Act. No. 16661.
  12. Seol, M. W. (2005). Quality criteria for measuing authenticity, reliability, integrity and usability of records. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 11, 41-90.
  13. Youn, E. (2019). A study on the concepts of record from a legal perspective. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 60, 89-121. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.089
  14. Duranti, L. & Eastwood, T. (1995). Protecting electronic evidence: a progress report on a research study and its methodology. Archivi and Computer, Roma, 3, 213-50.
  15. Duranti, L. & MacNeil, H. (1997). The preservation of the integrity of electronic records: an overview of the UBC-MAS research project. Archivaria, 42, 46-67. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12153
  16. Duranti, L. & Rogers, C. ed. (2019). Trusting Records in the Cloud. London: Facet Publishing.
  17. Duranti, L. (1989). Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science(Part I). Archivaria, 28, 7-27.
  18. Duranti, L. (1995). Reliability and authenticity: the concepts and their implications. Archivaria, 39, 5-10. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12063
  19. Duranti, L. (2001). The impact of digital technology on archival science. Archival Science, 1, 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435638
  20. Duranti, L., Eastwood, T., & MacNeil, H. (2002). Preservation of the Integrity of Electronic Records. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  21. Electronic records as documentary evidence. Canadian General Standards Board(CGBS): 2017.
  22. Federal Rules of Evidence.
  23. Information and documentation - Records management - Core concepts and vocabulary. ISO 30300:2020.
  24. Information and documentation - Records management - Part 1: Concepts and principles, ISO 15489-1:2016.
  25. Information and documentation - Records management processes - Metadata for records: Part 1: Principles. ISO 23081-1:2017.
  26. InterPARES 1 Authenticity Task Force (2002). Requirements for Assessing and Maintaining the Authenticity of Electronic Records(Appendix 2).
  27. InterPARES 2 Project (2008). Terminology Cross-domain Task Force Report(including Appendix 22).
  28. Jansen, A. (2015). Object-oriented diplomatics: Using archival diplomatics in software application development to support authenticity of digital records. Records Management Journal, 25(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-04-2014-0022
  29. MacNeil, H. & Gilliland-Swetland, A. (2005). Authenticity Task Force Report. In Duranti, L. ed. The Long-Term Preservation of Authentic Electronic Records: http://www.interpares.org/book/
  30. Rogers, C. (2016). A literature review of authenticity of records in digital systems: from 'machine-readable' to records in the cloud. acervo, rio de janeiro, 29(2), 16-44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320593846
  31. Shepherd, E. & Yeo, G. (2003). Managing Records: a handbook of principles and practice. London: Facet Publishing.