DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Maternal Nursing Online Practice Experience

  • Received : 2021.06.30
  • Accepted : 2021.08.28
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

This study was phenomenological analysis of maternal nursing of online practice experience. The study participants were students in between the ages of 20 to 25 who participated in the online practice of maternal nursing and conducted to a total of three interviews until the meaning were no longer derived. The data collection period was from May 26 to June 5, 2021, and analysis was conducted simultaneously with the datas have collected. The collected data were analyzed using the Giorgi's Phenomenological Analysis Method, and the study resulted in five categories (Opportunity to repeat, Systematic Scenarios, Immediate nursing intervention feedback, Beneficial hands-on experience, Different case experiences), 11 subcomponents, and 21 Semantic units. Based on the results of this study, the following conclusions were obtained. In maternal nursing, nursing students could experience more systematic and diverse case online than experiences throughout clinical practice, and achievement was also increased in theory learning for online practice. In other words, the online practice of maternal nursing was suitable for various content compositions that could not be experienced in clinical practice, but it is deemed urgent to have a program in Korean suitable for Korean culture. In future studies, this researcher hope to produce a maternal nursing practice program in Korean.

Keywords

References

  1. Amos, E., & Whilte, M., Teaching tools: Problem-based learning, Nurs Edu, Vol. 23, pp. 11-14, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-199803000-00009
  2. JA Kim, What was the vSim for nursing practice experience? IJIBC, Vol. 12. No. 3, pp. 25-31, 2020.
  3. Tanner, C. A., Tending to our clinical education, J Nurs E여, Vol. 37, No. 8, pp. 335-336, 1998.
  4. MW Kim, Development of objectives in nursing clinical education based on the nursing core competences, J Korean Acd Nurs, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 380-402, 2006.
  5. Park, J. H., Jung, E., Ko, J. K., & Yoo, H. B. "Deliverytraining for undergraduate medical students using birthsimulator", Korean Journal of obstetrics & gynecology,51(9), 950-956, 2008.
  6. CW Chung, HS Kim, YS Park, "Effects ofhigh-fidelity simulation-based education on maternitynursing", Perspectives in Nursing Science, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 86-96, 2011.
  7. SA Kim, SK Lee, HJ Chae, "Effects of clinicalpractice and simulation-based practice for obstetricalnursing", Journal of Korean Academy of Womens HealthNursing, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 180-189, 2012.
  8. Mackinnon K, Marcellus L, Revers J, Gordon C, Ryan M, Butcher D, Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitatice evidence protocol, JBI Detanase System Rev Implement Rep, 2015, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 14-26, doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
  9. SE Lee, "Evaluation of the standardized patients(SP)managed instruction for a maternity nursing course",Journal of Korean Academy Society Nursing Education,Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 14-24, 2011.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2011.17.1.014).
  10. WS Lee, MO Kim, "Effects and adequacy ofhigh-fidelity simulation-based training for obstetrical nursing", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 433-443, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.433
  11. Patton, M. Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1990.
  12. HY Jung, SJ Kim, Nursing student's experience in child nursing practice, Vol. 12, No. 2, Academy of Asian Culture, Vol. 12, No.2 , 2021.
  13. HS Shin, GG Sim, Nursing students' experience in child care simulation, KISTI, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 147-155, 2010.
  14. DW Kwon, HS Park, SH Yun, After clinical practice, nursing students' clinical career recognition experience, Asian Cultural Center, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2018.
  15. YM Kim, YS Park, CW Chung, MJ Kim, Application and Evaluation of PBL in Maternal Nursing Practice, Korea Women's Health Nursing Society, vol. 12, No. 4, 2006.
  16. Seidman, I. Interviewing as qualitative research. New York: Teachers College Press. 1998.
  17. Giorgi, A. The phenomenological psychology of learning and the verbal learning tradition, In A. Giorgi, (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research, Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1985.