Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine (대한예방의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Social Intelligence Counseling Intervention to Reduce Bullying Behaviors Among Thai Lower Secondary School Students: A Mixed-method Study

  • Jueajinda, Samith (Behavioral Science Research Institute, Srinakharinwirot University) ;
  • Stiramon, Orapin (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Kasetsart University) ;
  • Ekpanyaskul, Chatchai (Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University)
  • Received : 2021.03.02
  • Accepted : 2021.07.15
  • Published : 2021.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and investigate the effectiveness of an integrative counseling intervention for enhancing social intelligence and reducing bullying behaviors among lower secondary school students in Bangkok, Thailand. Methods: An interventional mixed-method design was employed in 2 phases. Phase 1 involved the development of a qualitative method-based integrative counseling program from key informants using the eclecticism technique. In phase 2, a randomized controlled trial with a wait-list control was conducted and qualitative research was performed with students who demonstrated bullying behaviors. Demographic data, Social Intelligence Scale (SIS) scores, and Bullying-Behavior Scale (BBS) scores were collected at baseline. Changes in SIS scores and qualitative findings obtained from in-depth interviews were examined after counseling ended, and BBS scores were collected again 1 month later. Results: The developed social intelligence counseling program included eight 1-hour weekly sessions consisting of 3 components: (1) social awareness, (2) social information processing, and (3) social skills. After receiving this intervention, scores for the SIS overall (p<0.001) and all of its components (p<0.05) were significantly enhanced in the experimental group compared to the control group. Moreover, the mean BBS scores in the experimental group significantly decreased 1 month after counseling (p=0.001). With regard to the qualitative research results, the experimental students demonstrated improvements in all components of social intelligence. Conclusions: The results indicated that a preventive counseling program may enhance social intelligence, decrease bullying behaviors among lower secondary school students, and prevent further incidents of school violence. However, further studies in various population subgroups should also be performed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank everyone involved with this research, including the key informants, students, teachers, school directors and experts. Additionally, the authors thank Professor Dr. Low Wah Yun.

References

  1. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. School violence and bullying global status report; 2017 [cited 2020 Jun 7]. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246970.
  2. World Health Organization. Preventing youth violence: an overview of the evidence; 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 7]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/181008.
  3. Department of Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health. Bullying among children in Thailand is a world ranking second only to Japan; 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 7]. Available from: https://www.dmh.go.th/news-dmh/view.asp?id=27511 (Thai).
  4. Walters GD, Espelage DL. From victim to victimizer: hostility, anger, and depression as mediators of the bullying victimization-bullying perpetration association. J Sch Psychol 2018;68:73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.12.003
  5. Sivaraman B, Nye E, Bowes L. School-based anti-bullying interventions for adolescents in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav 2019;45:154-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.007
  6. Earnshaw VA, Reisner SL, Menino D, Poteat VP, Bogart LM, Barnes TN, et al. Stigma-based bullying interventions: a systematic review. Dev Rev 2018;48:178-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.02.001
  7. Cho S, Lee JM. Explaining physical, verbal, and social bullying among bullies, victims of bullying, and bully-victims: assessing the integrated approach between social control and lifestyles-routine activities theories. Child Youth Serv Rev 2018;91:372-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.06.018
  8. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Preventing bullying through science, policy, and practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2016, p. 179-252.
  9. Corey G. Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy. 9th ed. Belmont: Brooks Cole Cengage Learning; 2013, p. 7-282.
  10. Sameer BM. Social intelligence and aggression among senior secondary school students: a comparative sketch; 2007 [cited 2019 Nov 8]. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED500484.
  11. Shekarey A, Ladani HJ, Rostami MS, Jamshidi M. On the relationship between the social intelligence and aggression: a case study of high school boy students. Int J Educ 2013;5(1): 94-102.
  12. Goleman D. Social intelligence: the new science of human relationships. New York: Bantam Books; 2006, p. 8.
  13. Albrecht K. Social intelligence: the new science of success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006, p. 12-13.
  14. Creswell JW. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2015, p. 1-7.
  15. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006;18(1):59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  16. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39(2):175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  17. Silvera DH, Martinussen M, Dahl TI. The Tromso Social Intelligence Scale, a self-report measure of social intelligence. Scand J Psychol 2001;42(4):313-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00242
  18. Olweus D. The revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Bergen: University of Bergen; 1996, p. 17-36.
  19. Tapanya S. Final report: a study to develop the model for sustainable prevention violence against children. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University; 2007, p. 24-36 (Thai).
  20. Solberg ME, Olweus D. Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggr Behav 2003;29(3):239-268. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.10047
  21. Larson-Hall J. A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York: Routledge; 2009, p. 139-144.
  22. Zautra EK, Zautra AJ, Gallardo CE, Velasco L. Can we learn to treat one another better? A test of a social intelligence curriculum. PLoS One 2015;10(6):e0128638. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128638
  23. Patrick RB, Rote WM, Gibbs JC, Basinger KS. Defend, stand by, or join in?: the relative influence of moral identity, moral judgment, and social self-efficacy on adolescents' bystander behaviors in bullying situations. J Youth Adolesc 2019;48(10): 2051-2064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01089-w
  24. Poyhonen V, Juvonen J, Salmivalli C. Standing up for the victim, siding with the bully or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situations. Soc Dev 2012;21(4):722-741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00662.x
  25. Veenstra R, Lindenberg S, Huitsing G, Sainio M, Salmivalli C. The role of teachers in bullying: the relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying. J Educ Psychol 2014;106(4):1135-1143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036110
  26. Chan F. Counseling theories and techniques for rehabilitation and mental health professionals. New York: Springer; 2015, p. 74-76.
  27. Sharf RS. Theories of psychotherapy & counseling: concepts and cases. 5th ed. Belmont: Brooks Cole; 2012, p. 4.
  28. Permata SA, Thahir A, Utami FP. Reality counseling with value judgement techniques to reduce bullying behavior of vocational students. Psychol Res Educ Soc Sci 2020;1(2):83-89.