DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A drift-based design procedure for RC buildings considering the effect of shear wall-floor slabs junction

  • Kaushik, Snehal (Department of Civil Engineering, Girijananda Chowdhury Institute of Management and Technology) ;
  • Dasgupta, Kaustubh (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati)
  • Received : 2020.09.09
  • Accepted : 2021.08.11
  • Published : 2021.09.25

Abstract

Reinforced Concrete (RC) structural wall is widely used in the lateral force resisting system for multistoried RC frame buildings located in earthquake-prone regions. In such buildings, the wall is connected to the RC slab at every floor level. The junction region of shear wall and floor slab constitutes an important link in the load path from slab to wall during earthquake shaking, thereby influencing the pattern of lateral load distribution in the shear wall. In case of multistoried building, the maximum elastic drift is estimated by carrying out linear static analysis for different load combinations as recommended by the Indian Earthquake Code IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016. However, during strong earthquake shaking, the inelastic lateral drift needs to be monitored to avoid undesirable levels of damage in structural members. The inelastic drift level of an isolated slender shear wall considering the behaviour of wall-slab junction has not been studied in the past. The present study aims to investigate the possible lateral drift limit of RC wall frame building considering the effect of floor slabs.

Keywords

References

  1. ABAQUS (2011), ABAQUS Analysis User's Manual. Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorenson, Pawtucket, R.I.
  2. ASCE 7-10 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia, U.S.A.
  3. BS EN 1998-1 (2005), Eurocode 8: Design for Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
  4. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (2016), Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. Part 1: General Provisions for all structures and specific provisions for buildings. IS 1893, New Delhi, India.
  5. Cassis, J.H. and Bonelli, P. (1992), "Lessons learned from the March 3, 1985 Chile earthquake and related research", Proceeding of the Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, July.
  6. Celebi, M. and Okawa, I. (2014). "Drift issues of tall buildings during the March 11, 2011 M9.0 Tohoku earthquake, Japan - Implications", Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, Alaska, July.
  7. Derecho, A.T., Ghosh, S.K., Iqbal, M., Freskakis, G.N. and Fintel, M. (1978), "Structural walls in earthquake resistant buildings-Dynamic analyses of isolated structural walls-Development of Design Procedure-Design Force Levels", Report to the National Science Foundation, RANN, under Grant No. ENV74-14766, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL.
  8. Duffey, T., Goldman, A. and Farrar, C. (1994), "Shear wall ultimate drift limits", Earthq. Spectra, 10(4), 655-674. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585792
  9. Haldar, P. and Singh, Y. (2009), "Seismic performance and vulnerability of Indian code designed RC frame buildings", ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 46(1), 29-45.
  10. Huang, S.T., Huang, Y.S., He, A., Tang, X.L., Chen, Q.J., Liu, X. and Cia, J. (2018). "Experimental study on seismic behaviour of an innovative composite shear wall", J. Construct. Steel Res., 148, 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.05.003
  11. Kaushik, S. (2017), Influence of Floor Slab on Seismic Design of Rectangular Structural Wall in RC Frame-wall Buildings, Doctoral of Philosophy Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, India.
  12. Kaushik, S. and Dasgupta, K. (2019), "Seismic behavior of slab-structural wall junction of RC building", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 18(2), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0507-8.
  13. Khose, V.N., Singh, Y. and Lang, D.H. (2012), "A comparative study of design base shear for RC buildings in selected seismic design codes", Earthq. Spectra, 28(3), 1047-1070. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000057
  14. Korkmaz, H.H. and Ecemis, A.S. (2017), "Seismic upgrading of reinforced concrete frames with steel plate shear walls", Earthq. Struct., 13(5), 473-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.5.473
  15. Li, Z., He, M., Li, M. and Lam, F. (2014), "Damage assessment and performance-based seismic design of timber-steel hybrid shear wall systems", Earthq. Struct., 7(1), 101-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.1.101.
  16. Naderpour, H. and Vakili, K. (2019). "Safety assessment of dual shear wall-frame structures subject to Mainshock-Aftershock sequence in terms of fragility and vulnerability curves", Earthq. Struct., 16(4), 425-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.4.425
  17. NZS 1170.5 (2004), Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake Actions-New Zealand, Standards New Zealand, Wellington 6020.
  18. Priestley, M.J.N. and Kowalsky, M.J. (1998), "Aspects of drift and ductility capacity of rectangular cantilever structural walls", Bull. New Zealand Nat. Soc. Earthq. Eng., 31(2), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.31.2.73-85.
  19. Ren, P., Li, Y., Guan, H. and Lu, X. (2015), "Progressive collapse resistance of two typical high-rise RC frame shear wall structures", J. Perform. Construct. Facilities, ASCE, 29(3), 04014087-1-9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000593.
  20. Riddell, R. (1992), "Performance of R/C buildings in the 1985 Chile earthquake", Proceedings of Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, July.
  21. Seneviratna, G.D.P.K. and Krawinkler, H. (1997). Evaluation of Inelastic MDOF Effects for Seismic Design, Report No. 120, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  22. Wallace, J.W. and Moehle, J.P. (1992), "Ductility and detailing requirements of bearing wall buildings", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 118(6), 1625-1644. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:6(1625).