The Korean Journal of Pain

The Korean Pain Society (대한통증학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Predictors of discogenic pain in magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective study of provocative discography performed by posterolateral approach

  • Jain, Anuj (Department of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Science) ;
  • Jain, Suruchi (Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Barasker, Swapnil Kumar (Department of Anesthesiology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and Post Graduate Institute) ;
  • Agrawal, Amit (Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Science)
  • Received : 2021.05.03
  • Accepted : 2021.07.05
  • Published : 2021.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Provocative discography (PD) is a test that is useful in diagnosing discogenic pain (DP). In this study, to diagnose DP, we used a posterolateral approach of needle placement and followed pressure criteria laid down by the Spine Intervention Society. The aim was to identify the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (desiccation, high intensity zone and change in shape and size of the disc) and the results of PD. Methods: Records of 50 patients who underwent PD for DP were analyzed. A total of 109 PDs were performed, with 54 suspect and 55 control discs. Alternate pain generators were ruled out. Results: A total of 35 suspect discs were positive on PD. The mean disc pressure in the suspect disc was 31.9 ± 7.9 psi (range, 15-44). Of the 50 patients who underwent PD, 35 had positive MRI findings. A significant positive correlation was found only between disc desiccation and discography result (r = 0.6, P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that only desiccation successfully predicted the result of discography (OR = 26.5, P < 0.001); a high intensity zone and a disc protrusion/extrusion had an OR 2.3 and 1.24, respectively. Disc desiccation of Pfirmann grade 3 or more had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.93 and 0.64 respectively in identifying painful discs; the positive likelihood ratio was 2.58 while the negative likelihood ratio was 0.11. Conclusions: In patients with DP, disc desiccation is the most useful MRI feature that predicts a painful disc on PD.

Keywords

References

  1. Nachemson A, Zdeblick TA, O'Brien JP. Lumbar disc disease with discogenic pain. What surgical treatment is most effective? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21: 1835-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199608010-00023
  2. Zhou ZJ, Zhao FD, Fang XQ, Zhao X, Fan SW. Meta-analysis of instrumented posterior interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15: 295-310. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.4.SPINE10330
  3. Robaina-Padron FJ. [Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence]. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2007; 18: 406-13. Spanish. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1130-1473(07)70266-X
  4. Mayer HM. [Discogenic low back pain and degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis - how appropriate is surgical treatment?]. Schmerz 2001; 15: 484-91. German. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004820100036
  5. Lei D, Rege A, Koti M, Smith FW, Wardlaw D. Painful disc lesion: can modern biplanar magnetic resonance imaging replace discography? J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21: 430-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e318153f7e4
  6. Manchikanti L, Soin A, Benyamin RM, Singh V, Falco FJ, Calodney AK, et al. An update of the systematic appraisal of the accuracy and utility of discography in chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2018; 21: 91-110.
  7. Levi D, Carnahan D, Horn S, Levin J. Is a history of severe episodic low back pain an indicator of a discogenic etiology? Pain Med 2018; 19: 1334-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx147
  8. Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, Spindler MF, McAuley JH, Laslett M, et al. Systematic review of tests to identify the disc, SIJ or facet joint as the source of low back pain. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 1539-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0391-1
  9. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 1873-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011
  10. Manchikanti L, Glaser SE, Wolfer L, Derby R, Cohen SP. Systematic review of lumbar discography as a diagnostic test for chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 2009; 12: 541-59.
  11. Filippiadis DK, Mazioti A, Papakonstantinou O, Brountzos E, Gouliamos A, Kelekis N, et al. Quantitative discomanometry: correlation of intradiscal pressure values to pain reduction in patients with intervertebral disc herniation treated with percutaneous, minimally invasive, image-guided techniques. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35: 1145-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-011-0255-2
  12. Green SB. How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behav Res 1991; 26: 499-510. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7
  13. Stout A. Discography. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2010; 21: 859-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2010.07.002
  14. Cuellar JM, Stauff MP, Herzog RJ, Carrino JA, Baker GA, Carragee EJ. Does provocative discography cause clinically important injury to the lumbar intervertebral disc? A 10-year matched cohort study. Spine J 2016; 16: 273-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.051
  15. Koetsier E, Kallewaard JW, Maino P. Commentary on: does provocative discography cause clinically important injury to the lumbar intervertebral disc? A 10-year matched cohort study, by Cueller et al., Spine J 2016. Spine J 2017; 17: 610-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.12.001
  16. McCormick ZL, DeFrancesch F, Loomba V, Moradian M, Bathina R, Rappard G. Diagnostic value, prognostic value, and safety of provocation discography. Pain Med 2018; 19: 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx034
  17. Ohtori S, Inoue G, Orita S, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, Kishida S, et al. No acceleration of intervertebral disc degeneration after a single injection of bupivacaine in young age group with follow-up of 5 years. Asian Spine J 2013; 7: 212-7. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2013.7.3.212
  18. Engel AJ, Stojanovic MP, Vorobeychik Y, MacVicar J. High-pressure discography may injure discs. Spine J 2017; 17: 612-3.
  19. Yoshida H, Fujiwara A, Tamai K, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, Saotome K. Diagnosis of symptomatic disc by magnetic resonance imaging: T2-weighted and gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002; 15: 193-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200206000-00004
  20. Boos N, Rieder R, Schade V, Spratt KF, Semmer N, Aebi M. 1995 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception, and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20: 2613-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199512150-00002
  21. Fang C, Zhang W, Chen L, Li H. The correlation between the high-intensity zone on a T2-weighted MRI and positive outcomes of discography: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2017; 12: 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0523-1
  22. Wang H, Li Z, Zhang C, Zhang W, Li L, Guo J, et al. Correlation between high-intensity zone on MRI and discography in patients with low back pain. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96: e7222. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007222
  23. Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis SJ, Khurana S. 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 2987-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012010-00005
  24. Wang ZX, Hu YG. Factors associated with lumbar disc high-intensity zone (HIZ) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance image: a retrospective study of 3185 discs in 637 patients. J Orthop Surg Res 2018; 13: 307. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1010-z
  25. Hebelka H, Hansson T. HIZ's relation to axial load and low back pain: investigated with axial loaded MRI and pressure controlled discography. Eur Spine J 2013; 22: 734-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2501-y
  26. Lam KS, Carlin D, Mulholland RC. Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: the value and significance of provocative discography in the determination of the discogenic pain source. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050006
  27. Kang CH, Kim YH, Lee SH, Derby R, Kim JH, Chung KB, et al. Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict concordant pain provocation during provocative disc injection? Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38: 877-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0709-7
  28. Chelala L, Trent G, Waldrop G, Dagher AP, Reinig JW. Positive predictive values of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging findings for provocative discography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2019; 43: 568-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000885
  29. O'Neill C, Kurgansky M, Kaiser J, Lau W. Accuracy of MRI for diagnosis of discogenic pain. Pain Physician 2008; 11: 311-26.
  30. Jain A, Agarwal A, Jain S, Shamshery C. Bertolotti syndrome: a diagnostic and management dilemma for pain physicians. Korean J Pain 2013; 26: 368-73. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.4.368
  31. Hebelka H, Gaulitz A, Nilsson A, Holm S, Hansson T. The transfer of disc pressure to adjacent discs in discography: a specificity problem? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: E1025-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bf8a4d
  32. Wolfer LR, Derby R, Lee JE, Lee SH. Systematic review of lumbar provocation discography in asymptomatic subjects with a meta-analysis of false-positive rates. Pain Physician 2008; 11: 513-38. https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2008/11/513
  33. Yu Y, Liu W, Song D, Guo Q, Jia L. Diagnosis of discogenic low back pain in patients with probable symptoms but negative discography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132: 627-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1448-5
  34. Eck JC, Sharan A, Resnick DK, Watters WC 3rd, Ghogawala Z, Dailey AT, et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 6: discography for patient selection. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21: 37-41. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14269
  35. Ohtori S, Kinoshita T, Yamashita M, Inoue G, Yamauchi K, Koshi T, et al. Results of surgery for discogenic low back pain: a randomized study using discography versus discoblock for diagnosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 1345-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a401bf
  36. Peh W. Provocative discography: current status. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2005; 1: e2. https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.1.1.e2
  37. Kim HS, Paudel B, Chung SK, Jang JS, Oh SH, Jang IT. Transforaminal epiduroscopic laser ablation of sinuvertebral nerve in patients with chronic diskogenic back pain: technical note and preliminary result. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2017; 78: 529-34. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604361
  38. Bogduk N, Tynan W, Wilson AS. The nerve supply to the human lumbar intervertebral discs. J Anat 1981; 132(Pt 1): 39-56.