디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권9호
  • /
  • Pages.373-383
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

비대면 정서도식 커플 집단상담 프로그램이 관계갈등경험이 있는 미혼 커플의 정서능력 향상에 미치는 효과

The Effect of Un-tact Emotional Schema Group Counseling Program on the Improvement of Emotional Ability of Unmarried Couples with Relationship Conflict Experiences

  • 장성호 (한국도박문제관리센터 경북센터) ;
  • 박재서 (한동대학교 첨단융합학과) ;
  • 황분홍 (한국도박문제관리센터 전북센터) ;
  • 신성만 (한동대학교 상담심리사회복지학부)
  • Jang, Sung-Ho (Gyeong-Buk Center, Korea Center On Gambling Problems) ;
  • Park, Jae-Seo (Department of Advanced Convergence, Handong Global University) ;
  • Hwang, Boon-Hong (Jeon-Buk Center, Korea Center On Gambling Problems) ;
  • Shin, Sung-Man (Counseling Psychology & Social Welfare, Handong Global University)
  • 투고 : 2021.08.19
  • 심사 : 2021.09.20
  • 발행 : 2021.09.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 코로나-19 팬데믹이라는 위기로 인해 증가하고 있는 커플 관계에서의 갈등을 다루기 위해 비대면 정서도식 커플 집단상담 프로그램을 개발하고 미혼 커플의 정서인지 및 정서조절 향상에 미치는 효과를 검증하는 데 있다. 연구절차는 프로그램 개발 절차와 프로그램 효과성 검증 절차로 이루어졌고, 구체적으로 8단계의 프로그램 개발과정을 바탕으로 프로그램을 개발하였다. 연구대상은 미혼 커플 11쌍(22명)으로 총 4개의 집단으로 구성되었으며, 주 1회(2회기)씩 총 5주(10회기) 동안 진행되었다. 프로그램의 효과성 검증은 양적 분석과 질적 분석을 통해 실시하였다. 양적 분석 결과, 참여자들의 이성관계 만족도가 유의미하게 향상되고, 커플들의 관계정서도식에 유의한 변화가 있음을 확인하였다. 참여자들의 프로그램 소감문에 대한 질적 분석한 결과, 참여자들의 정서이해가 향상되고, 커플관계가 개선되었으며, 커플 집단상담만의 집단효과가 있었다. 끝으로, 본 연구의 의의 및 제한점을 제시하였다.

The purpose of this research was to develop an un-tact group counseling program to deal with the conflicts in the relationship of unmarried couples and to verify the effect of the program for improving emotional cognition and emotion regulation of unmarried couples. The research procedure consisted of the program development step and the program verification step, and in detail, 8 steps of program development processes were established. The subjects of the research were 11 unmarried couples, and 4 group were organized. The group counseling program was conducted once a week (2 sessions), a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks. The effect was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. As a result of quantitative analysis, the participant's relationship satisfaction was significantly improved and there was a significant change in some relationship emotional schemas of participants. As a result of qualitatively analysis through participant's program review, participant's emotional understanding and the couple relationship were improved, and the group effect of the couple group counseling was found. Finally, the significance and limitations of this study were presented.

키워드

과제정보

This paper was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019S1A5A2A01050499)

참고문헌

  1. S. M. Stanley., & H. J. Markman. (2020). Helping couples in the shadow of COVID-19. Family process, 59(3), 937-955. DOI: 10.1111/famp.12575
  2. D. N. Machado et al. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on Anxiety, Depression and Other Mental Health Issues: A worldwide scope review. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-58186/v1
  3. D. Talevi et al. (2020). Mental health outcomes of the CoViD-19 pandemic. Rivista di psichiatria, 55(3), 137-144. DOI: 10.1708/3382.33569
  4. L. Schmid., J. Worn., K. Hank., B. Sawatzki., & S. Walper. (2021). Changes in employment and relationship satisfaction in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from the German family Panel. European Societies, 23, 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1836385
  5. A. Sommerlad et al. (2021). Social relationships and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analysis of the COVID-19 Social Study. Psychological medicine, 1-10. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291721000039
  6. R. N. Balzarini et al. (2020). Love in the time of COVID: Perceived partner responsiveness buffers people from lower relationship quality associated with COVID-related stressors.
  7. J. L. Lebow. (2020). Family in the Age of COVID-19. Family Process, 59(2), 309-312. DOI: 10.1111/famp.12543
  8. L. A. Neff., & B. R. Karney. (2004). How does context affect intimate relationships? Linking external stress and cognitive processes within marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(2), 134-148. DOI: 10.1177/0146167203255984
  9. P. R. Pietromonaco., & N. C. Overal. (2021). Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples' relationships. American Psychologist, 76(3), 438-450. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000714
  10. E. H. Erikson. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.
  11. C. M. Proulx., H. M. Helms., & C. Buehler. (2007). Marital quality and personal well being: A meta analysis. Journal of Marriage and family, 69(3), 576-593. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x
  12. J. W. Lee., & J. K. Chang. (2017). The Mediating Effect of Emotional Regulation Ability on the Relationship between Family of Origin Experience and Satisfaction of Romantic Relationship. Family and Culture, 29(3), 1-35. DOI:10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.8.352
  13. J. Ferreira. (2019). Predicting married couples' daily relationship satisfaction from difficulties with emotion regulation and daily negative relationship behaviours. Doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
  14. J. J. Gross. (2014). Emotion regulation: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp.3-22). New York: The Guilford Press.
  15. J. M. Gottman., & C. I. Notarius. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 927-947. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00927.x
  16. K. L. Gratz., & L. Roemer. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41-54. DOI:10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94
  17. R. Davoodi. (2014). The effect of emotional schemas-based group therapy on emotion regulation in married women: A Case Study of Isfahan. Adv Environ Biol, 8, 1458-1465.
  18. R. L. Leahy. (2016). Emotional schema therapy: A meta experiential model. Australian Psychologist 51(2), 82-88. DOI: 10.1111/ap.12142
  19. R. L. Leahy., D. Trich., & L. A. Napolitano. (2011). Emotion Regulation in Psychotherapy: A practiotioner's guide. New York: The Guilford press.
  20. R. L. Leahy. (2015). Emotional Schema Therapy. New York: The Guilford Press.
  21. A. Erfan., A. A. Noorbala., S. K. Amel., A. Mohammadi., & P. Adibi. (2018). The effectiveness of emotional schema therapy on the emotional schemas and emotional regulation in irritable bowel syndrome: single subject design. Advanced biomedical research, 7. DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_113_16
  22. M. Morvaridi., A. Mashhadi., Z. S. Shamloo., & R. L. Leahy. (2019). The effectiveness of group emotional schema therapy on emotional regulation and social anxiety symptoms. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 12(1), 16-24. DOI: 10.1007/s41811-018-0037-6
  23. H. C. Williamson. (2020). Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on relationship satisfaction and attributions. Psychological Science, 31(12), 1479-1487. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620972688
  24. N. R. Hardy., C. A. Maier., & T. J. Gregson. (2021). Couple teletherapy in the era of COVID-19: Experiences and recommendations. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 47(2), 225-243 DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12501
  25. J .H. Kwon., & K. M. Choi. (1999). A Validation Study of the Korean Marital Satisfaction Inventory. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(1), 123-139.
  26. S. Y. Yu. (2000). The Relation of Perceived Discrepancy of Love and Attributional Style of Responsibility on the Satisfaction of Heterosexual Relationship. Masters dissertation. Catholic University, Seoul.
  27. Y. J. Lee. (2006). The parental Attachment and Interaction and Dating Relationship in College Students. Masters dissertation. Sogang University, Seoul.
  28. R. L. Leahy. (2018). Emotional schema therapy: Distinctive features. Oxforshire: Routledge.
  29. D. W. Hahn., C. K. Koo., C. H. Lee,. & C. D. Spileberger. (1997). Korean Adaptation of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory: Anger and Blood Pressure. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 2(1), 60-78.
  30. C. D. Kim., E. J. Shin., S. H. Lee., & H. N. Choi. (2011). The Development and Evaluation of Counseling and Psychology Education. Seoul: Hakjisa
  31. S. H. Kim., & G. H. Park. (2010). The Development of the Interpersonal Relationship Harmony Program for University Students. The Korea Journal of Counseling, 11(1), 375-393. DOI: 10.15703/kjc.11.1.201003.375
  32. D. I. Kim., Y. A. Ra., H. U. Lee., C. M. Keum., & S. Y. Park. (2016). Investigating Facilitating and Risk Factors for Successful Free-semester Program in South Korea. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(2), 345-371. https://doi.org/10.17286/KJEP.2016.30.2.04