Applied Microscopy

  • 제51권
  • /
  • Pages.3.1-3.6
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2287-5123(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-4445(eISSN)
한국현미경학회 (Korean Society of Microscopy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ultrastructure of the fertilized egg envelope from Melanotaenia praecox, Melanotaeniidae, Teleostei

  • Joon Hyung Sohn (Institute of Lifestyle Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Dong Heui Kim (Department of Environmental Medical Biology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.03
  • 심사 : 2021.03.23
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

We examined the morphology of fertilized egg and ultrastructures of fertilized egg envelopes of dwarf rainbowfish (Melanotaenia praecox) belong to Melanotaeniidae using light and electron microscopes. The fertilized eggs were spherical with adhesive filament, transparent, demersal, and had a narrow perivitelline space and small oil droplets. The size of fertilized egg was 1.02 ± 0.18 mm (n = 30), and there were two kinds of adhesive filament on the fertilized eggs. The long and thick (diameter 12.22 ± 0.52 ㎛, n = 20) adhesive filaments were only at the area of animal pole, and short and thin (diameter 1.99 ± 0.23 ㎛, n = 20) adhesive filaments were around the long filaments. A micropyle was conical shaped with adhesive filament and located near the animal pole of egg. The outer surface of fertilized egg was rough side. Also, the total thickness of the fertilized egg envelope was about 7.46 ± 0.41 ㎛ (n = 20), the fertilized egg envelope consisted of two layers, an inner lamellae layer and an outer layer with high electron-density. And the inner layer was 8 layers. Collectively, these morphological characteristics and adhesive property of fertilized egg with adhesive filaments, and ultrastructures of micropyle, outer surface, and section of fertilized egg envelope are showed species specificity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A.R. Brummett, J.N. Dumont, A comparison of chorions from eggs of northern and southern populations of Fundulus heteroclitus. Copeia 3, 607-614 (1981)
  2. I.L. Cameron, K.E. Hunter, Regulation of the permeability of the medaka fish embryo chorion by exogeneous sodium and calcium ions. J. Exp. Zool. 231, 447-454 (1984)
  3. B.S. Chang, E.K. Choi, H.W. Kim, D.H. Kim, Ultrastructure of the fertilized egg envelopes in Hemigrammus erythrozonus, Characidae, teleostei. Appl. Microsc. 49(8) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42649-019-0010-8
  4. E.K. Choi, J.H. Sohn, S.S. Han, D.H. Kim, Comparative ultrastructure of the fertilized egg envelope in Corydoras adolfoi and Corydoras sterbai, Callichthyidae, teleostei. Microsc. Res. Tech. 82, 33-38 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23057
  5. Y.K. Deung, D.H. Kim, D.S. Reu, Ultrastructure of the fertilized egg envelope from pale chub, Cyprinidae, teleost. Kor. J. Electron Microsc. 30, 321-326 (2000)
  6. Y.K. Deung, D.S. Reu, D.H. Kim, Comparative ultrastructures of the fertilized egg envelopes in golden severum, convic cichlid and discus, Cichlidae, teleost. Kor. J. Electron Microsc. 27, 417-432 (1997)
  7. J.N. Dumont, A.R. Brummet, The vitelline envelope, chorion, and micropyle of Fundulus heteroclitus eggs. Gamete Res. 3, 25-44 (1980)
  8. Fishbase contributors, Melanotaenia praecox (Weber & de Beaufort, 1922), Dwarf rainbowfish, Fishbase, https://www.fishbase.se/summary/10516. Accessed 12 Jan 2021
  9. R. Furusawa, Y. Okinaka, K. Uematsu, T. Nakai, Screening of freshwater fish species for their susceptibility to a betanodavirus. Dis. Aquat. Org. 77, 119-125 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3354/dao01841
  10. J.P. Grierson, A.C. Neville, Hellicoidal architecture of fish eggshell. Tissue Cell 13, 819-830 (1981)
  11. B. Harvey, R.N. Kelley, M.J. Ashwood-Smith, Permeability of intact and dechorionated zebrafish embryos to glycerol and dimethyl sulfoxide. Cryobio. 20, 432-439 (1983)
  12. V.N. Ivankov, V.P. Kurdyayeva, Systematic differences and the ecological importance of the membranes in fish eggs. J. Ichthyol. 13, 864-873 (1973)
  13. K.B. Joo, D.H. Kim, Comparative ultrastructures of the fertilized egg envelopes in Danio rerio and Danio rerio var. frankei, Cyprinidae, teleostei. Appl. Microsc 43, 14-20 (2013). https://doi.org/10.9729/AM.2013.43.1.14
  14. D.H. Kim, Ultrastructure of the fertilized egg envelopes in Ancistrus cirrhosus, Loricariidae, Teleostei. Appl. Microsc 50, 13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42649-020-00034-7
  15. D.H. Kim, B.S. Chang, Y.K. Deung, S. Kim, K.B. Joo, K.J. Lee, Ultrastructure of the fertilized egg envelope in Cichlasoma managuensis, Cichlidae, teleost. Kor. J. Microsc. 39, 9-15 (2009)
  16. D.H. Kim, Y.K. Deung, H.Y. Kim, D.S. Reu, Ultrastructure of the fertilized egg envelope from long nose barbel, Cyprinidae, teleost. Kor. J. Electron Microsc. 31, 85-90 (2001)
  17. D.H. Kim, Y.K. Deung, W.J. Kim, D.S. Reu, S.J. Kang, Comparative ultrastructures of the fertilized egg envelopes from three-spot gourami, pearl gourami and marble gourami, Belontiidae, teleost. Kor. J. Electron Microsc. 29, 343-351 (1999)
  18. D.H. Kim, Y.K. Deung, K.J. Lee, Ultrastructure of the fertilized egg envelope from Hyphessobrycon serpae, Characidae, teleost. Kor. J. Electron Microsc. 35, 89-96 (2005)
  19. D.H. Kim, D.S. Reu, Y.K. Deung, A comparative study on the ultrastructures of the egg envelope in fertilized eggs of fishes, Characidae, three species. Kor. J. Electron Microsc. 26, 277-291 (1996)
  20. D.H. Kim, D.S. Reu, Y.K. Deung, Comparative ultrastructures of the fertilized egg envelopes in three species, Cyprinidae, teleost. Kor. J. Electron Microsc. 28, 237-253 (1998)
  21. D.H. Kim, D.S. Reu, Y.K. Deung, Ultrastructure of the fertilized egg envelope from dark sleeper, Eleotrididae, teleost. Kor. J. Electron Microsc. 32, 39-44 (2002)
  22. J.K. Kwon, H.S. Jung, D.H. Kim, Comparative ultrastructures of the fertilized egg envelopes in Nothobranchius guentheri and Nothobranchius patrizii, Nothobranchiidae, teleostei. Appl. Microsc. 45, 144-149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.9729/AM.2015.45.3.144
  23. O. Kwon, J.H. Shon, D.Y. Chung, E.J. Kim, D.H. Kim, Comparative ultrastructures of the fertilized egg envelopes in Nothobranchius foerschi and Nothobranchius rachovii, Nothobranchiidae, teleostei. Appl. Microsc. 47, 70-74 (2017). https://doi.org/10.9729/AM.2017.47.2.70
  24. H.W. Laale, The perivitelline space and egg envelopes of bony fishes: A review. Copeia 1980, 210-226 (1980)
  25. M.C. Radael, L.D.C. LD, D.R. Andrade, D. Mattos, J.H. Motta, J.V. Manhaes, M.V. Vidal, Morphophysiological characterization of the embryonic development of Melanotaenia praecox (weber & de Beaufort, 1922). Zygote 22, 533-539 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S096719941300018X
  26. R. Riehl, H. Greven, Fine structure of egg envelopes in some viviparous goodeid fishes, with comments on the relation of envelope thinness to viviparity. Can. J. Zool. 71, 91-97 (1993)
  27. C.M. Stehr, J.W. Hawkes, The comparative ultrastructure of the egg membrane and associated pore structures in the starry flounder, Platichthys stellatus (Pallas), and pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha (Walbaum). Cell Tiss. Res. 202, 347-356 (1979)
  28. A.R. Tappin, Rainbowfish, Melanotaenia praecox, www.rainbowfish.angfaqld.org.au/Praecox.htm. (2016)