Computers and Concrete

  • 제28권3호
  • /
  • Pages.275-287
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1598-8198(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-818X(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improving the seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames using an innovative metallic-shear damper

  • Alshimmeri, Ahmad Jabbar Hussain (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad) ;
  • Konton, Denise-Penelope N. (Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of the Peloponnese) ;
  • Ghamari, Ali (Department of Civil Engineering, Darreh Shahr Branch, Islamic Azad University)
  • 투고 : 2021.05.03
  • 심사 : 2021.08.24
  • 발행 : 2021.09.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In reinforced concrete (RC) frames, the applied seismic energy is dissipated through the ductile behavior of RC moment resisting frames. The main elements of the RC frames carry the gravity loads in addition to the seismic loads. Since the RC frames are sensitive to gravity loads, the ductility of the frames is reduced by increasing the gravity loads. Moreover, because of the low stiffness of the RC moment frames, huge member sizes of structural elements are required to control lateral drifts under lateral loading. In addition, the existing RC moment frame buildings with non-ductile characteristics pose a considerable hazard during earthquakes. To solve the mentioned problems, an innovative metallic damper with a shear link (metallic-passive energy damper) was developed in this paper. The proposed damper not only enjoys an easy fabrication and a good seismic performance but also can be easily replaced after a severe earthquake. Since the damper does not carry the gravity loads, replacing the damper does not affect the severability of the building during repairing. The main goal of this study is to confine the plastic deformation in the proposed damper. The numerical results indicated that the proposed damper improved the behavior of the RC frame in elastic and inelastic zones. It enhanced the shear capacity, shear stiffness, energy absorption, and ductility of the RC moment resisting frame. The results indicated that the proposed damper enhances the shear stiffness and the ultimate shear capacity from a minimum of 11% to a maximum of 24% and from a minimum of 11% to a maximum of 48%, respectively. Also, the proposed damper improved the yielding strength from a minimum of 53% to a maximum of 61%. Moreover, the dynamic analysis indicated that the damper improved the behavior of the system in the case of maximum lateral displacement and base shear. Based on the time-history dynamic analysis, dampers in the 5- and 10-story frames are more effective compared to the 15-story frame. This result confirms the suitable performance of the proposed damper. Herein the required equations and the recommendations for the design of the proposed metallic-shear damper have been presented.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ACI 318 (2014), Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-14), American Concrete Institute; Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA.
  2. AISC (2016), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, Standard ANSI/AISC 341-02, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
  3. Al-Osta, M. (2019), "Shear behaviour of RC beams retrofitted using UHPFRC panels epoxied to the sides", Comput. Concrete, 24(1), 37-49. http://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2019.24.1.037.
  4. Au, F.T.K. and Bai, Z.Z. (2006), "Effect of axial load on flexural behaviour of cyclically loaded RC columns", Comput. Concrete, 3(4), 261-284. http://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2006.3.4.261.
  5. Balendra, T., Sam, M., Liaw, C.Y. and Lee, S. (1991), "Preliminary studies into the behavior of knee braced frames subject to seismic loading", Eng. Struct., 13(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(91)90010-A .
  6. Batterbee, D. C. and Sims, N.D. (2005), "Vibration isolation with smart fluid dampers: a benchmarking study", Smart Struct. Syst., 1(3), 235-256. http://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2005.1.3.235.
  7. Berman, J. and Bruneau, M. (2007), "Experimental and analytical investigation of tubular links for eccentrically braced frames", Eng. Struct., 29, 1929-1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.10.012.
  8. Bouwkamp, J., Vetr, M.G. and Ghamari, A. (2016), "An analytical model for inelastic cyclic response of eccentrically braced frame with vertical shear link (V-EBF)", Case Stud. Struct. Eng., 6, 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csse.2016.05.002.
  9. Broujerdian. V., Shayanfar, M.A. and Ghamari, A. (2017), "Corner crack effect on the seismic behavior of steel plate shear wall system", Civil Eng. Infrastr. J., 50(2), 311-332. https://doi.org/10.7508/ceij.2017.02.007.
  10. Chen, L., Tremblay, R. and Tirca, L. (2019), "Modular tied eccentrically braced frames for improved seismic response of tall buildings", J. Constr. Steel Res., 155, 370-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.01.005.
  11. Dadmand, B., Pourbaba, M., Sadaghian, H. and Mirmiran, A. (2020), "Experimental & numerical investigation of mechanical properties in steel fiber-reinforced UHPC", Comput. Concrete, 26(5), 451-465. http://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2020.26.5.451.
  12. Du, Z.L., Liu, Y.P. and Chan, S.L. (2019), "A practical analytical model for special concentrically braced frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 155, 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.12.027.
  13. Eldin, M.N., Kim, J. and Kim, J. (2018), "Optimum distribution of steel slit-friction hybrid dampers based on life cycle cost", Steel Compos. Struct., 27(5), 633-646. http://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.5.633.
  14. Fakhraddini, A., Fadaee. M.J. and Saffari, H. (2018), "A lateral load pattern based on energy evaluation for eccentrically braced frames", Steel Compos. Struct., 27(5), 623-632, http://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.5.623.
  15. FEMA 356 (2015), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  16. FEMA 440 (2015), Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedure, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  17. Ghamari, A., Haeri, H., Khaloo, A. and Zhu, A. (2019), "Improving the hysteretic behavior of Concentrically Braced Frame (CBF) by a proposed shear damper", Steel Compos. Struct., 30(4), 383-392. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.30.4.383.
  18. Ghasemitabar, A., Rahmdel, J. and Shafei, E. (2020), "Cyclic performance of RC beam-column joints enhanced with superelastic SMA rebars", Comput. Concrete, 25(4), 293-302. http://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2020.25.4.293.
  19. Ghobarah, A. and AbouElfath, H. (2001), "Rehabilitation of a reinforced concrete frame using eccentric steel bracing", Eng. Struct., 23, 745-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00100-0.
  20. Haddad, M. and Shrive, N. (2019), "Investigating the inelastic cyclic behaviour of large-size steel wide-flange section braces", Constr. Build. Mater., 199(28), 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.016.
  21. Hatami, F., Ghamari, A. and Hatami, F. (2014), "Effect of fiber angle on LYP steel shear walls behavior", J. Central South Univ., 21(2), 768-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2000-x.
  22. Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings (Standard No. 2800) (2015), Building and Housing Research Center (BHRC), 4th Revision, Tehran, Iran.
  23. Javidan, M.M. and Kim, J. (2020), "Steel hysteretic column dampers for seismic retrofit of soft-first-story structures", Steel Compos. Struct., 37(3), 259-272. http://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.37.3.259.
  24. Javidan, M.M., Nasab, M.S.E. and Kim, J. (2021), "Full-scale tests of two-story RC frames retrofitted with steel plate multi-slit dampers", Steel Compos. Struct., 39(5), 645-664. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.39.5.645.
  25. Kang, J.W. and Lee, J. (2018), "A correction method for objective seismic damage index of reinforced concrete columns", Comput. Concrete, 21(6), 741-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.21.6.741.
  26. Kim, J., Choi. H. and Chung. L. (2004), "Energy-based seismic design of structures with buckling-restrained braces" Steel Compos. Struct., 4(6), 437-452. http://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2004.4.6.437.
  27. Kontoni, D.P.N. and Farghaly, A.A. (2019a), "Mitigation of the seismic response of a cable-stayed bridge with soil-structure-interaction effect using tuned mass dampers", Struct. Eng. Mech., 69(6), 699-712. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.69.6.699.
  28. Kontoni, D.P.N. and Farghaly, A.A. (2019b), "The effect of base isolation and tuned mass dampers on the seismic response of RC high-rise buildings considering soil-structure interaction", Earthq. Struct., 17(4), 425-434. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.17.4.425.
  29. Kontoni, D.P.N. and Farghaly, A.A. (2020), "TMD effectiveness for steel high-rise building subjected to wind or earthquake including soil-structure interaction", Wind Struct., 30(4), 423-432. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2020.30.4.423.
  30. Lian, M., Su, M. and Guo, Y. (2017), "Experimental performance of Y-shaped eccentrically braced frames fabricated with high strength steel", Steel Compos. Struct., 24(4), 441-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.24.4.441.
  31. Lotfollahi, M. and Alinia, M. (2009), "Effect of tension bracing on the collapse mechanism of steel moment frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 65, 2027-2039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.06.003.
  32. Meraji, L., Afshin, H. and Abedi, K. (2019), "Flexural behavior of RC beams retrofitted by ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete", Comput. Concrete, 24(2), 159-172. http://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2019.24.2.159.
  33. Mezquida-Alcaraz, E.J., Navarro-Gregori, J., Lopez, J.A. and Serna-Ros, P. (2019), "Validation of a non-linear hinge model for tensile behavior of UHPFRC using a Finite Element Model", Comput. Concrete, 32(1), 11-23. http://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2019.23.1.011.
  34. Momenzadeh, S.B. and Shen, J. (2018), "Seismic demand on columns in special concentrically braced frames", Eng. Struct., 168, 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.060.
  35. Mwafy, A. and Elnashai, A. (2001), "Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings", Eng. Struct., 23, 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00068-7.
  36. Oh, S.H., Kim, Y.J. and Ryu, H.S. (2009), "Seismic performance of steel structures with slit dampers", Eng. Struct., 31(9), 1997-2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.003.
  37. Ozkaynak, H. (2017), "Model proposal for steel cushions for use in reinforced concrete frames", KSCE J. Civil Eng., 21(7), 2717-2727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0477-1.
  38. Ozkaynak, H. (2018), "Earthquake behavior of steel cushionimplemented reinforced concrete frames", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 17(2), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0448-7.
  39. Ozkul, T., Kurtbeyoglu, A., Borekci, M., Zengin, B. and Kocak, A. (2019), "Effect of shear wall on seismic performance of RC frame buildings", Eng. Fail. Anal., 100, 60-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.02.032.
  40. Qi, Y., Li, Y. and Feng, N. (2017), "Seismic collapse probability of eccentrically braced steel frames", Steel Compos. Struct., 24(1), 37-52. http://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.24.1.037.
  41. Rai, D. and Wallace, B. (1998), "Aluminum shear-links for enhanced seismic resistance", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27(4), 315-342. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199804)27:4<315::AID-EQE703>3.0.CO;2-N.
  42. Ricles, J. and Popov, E. (1987), "Dynamic analysis of seismically resistant eccentrically braced frames", Report No. UCB/EERC-87/07, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  43. SAP2000® Version 17 (2015), Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design, Computers and Structures, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA and New York, NY, USA.
  44. Scott, B.D., Park, R. and Priestley, M. (1982), "Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates", ACI Struct. J., 76(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.14359/10875.
  45. Shayanfar, M.A., Barkhordari, M.A. and Rezaeian, A.R. (2012), "Experimental study of cyclic behavior of composite vertical shear link in eccentrically braced frames", Steel Compos. Struct., 12(1), 13-29. http://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2011.12.1.013.
  46. Shayanfar, M.A., Broujerdian, V. and Ghamari, A. (2020), "Numerically and parametrically investigating the cracked Steel Plate Shear Walls (SPSWs)", Iran. J. Sci. Technol., Tran. Civil Eng., 44, 481-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00250-6.
  47. Vetr, M.G. and Ghamari, A. (2019), "Experimentally and analytically study on eccentrically braced frame with vertical shear links", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 28(5), e1587, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1587.
  48. Vetr, M.G., Ghamari, A. and Bouwkamp, J. (2017), "Investigating the nonlinear behavior of eccentrically braced frame with vertical shear links (V-EBF)", J. Build. Eng., 10, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.02.002.
  49. Xiao, S., Xu, L. and Li, Z. (2019), "Seismic performance and damage analysis of RC frame-core tube building with self-centering braces", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 120, 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.029.