Wind and Structures

  • 제33권2호
  • /
  • Pages.141-154
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-6116(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6225(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Aerodynamic and hydrodynamic force simulation for the dynamics of double-hinged articulated offshore tower

  • Zaheer, Mohd Moonis (Department of Civil Engineering, Zakir Hussain College of Engineering and Technology) ;
  • Islam, Nazrul (Department of Civil Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia)
  • 투고 : 2021.03.09
  • 심사 : 2021.08.04
  • 발행 : 2021.08.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Articulated towers are one of the class of compliant offshore structures that freely oscillates with wind and waves, as they are designed to have low natural frequency than ocean waves. The present study deals with the dynamic response of a double-hinged articulated tower under hydrodynamic and aerodynamic loads. The wind field is simulated by two approaches, namely, single-point and multiple-point. Nonlinearities such as instantaneous tower orientation, variable added mass, fluctuating buoyancy, and geometrical nonlinearities are duly considered in the analysis. Hamilton's principle is used to derive the nonlinear equations of motion (EOM). The EOM is solved in the time domain by using the Wilson-θ method. The maximum, minimum, mean, and standard deviation and salient power spectral density functions (PSDF) of deck displacement, bending moment, and central hinge shear are drawn for high and moderate sea states. The analyses' outcome shows that tower response under multiple-point wind-field simulation results in lower responses compared to that of single-point simulation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abou, M.A., Khalil, N.N. and Afify, M.S. (2016), "Dynamic behavior of TLP supporting a 5 -MW wind turbines under multi-directional waves", Ocean Syst. Eng., 6(2), 203-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/ose.2016.6.2.203.
  2. Antoniou, M., Gelagoti, F. and Anastasopoulos, I. (2019), "A compliant guyed system for deep-sea installations of offshore wind turbines: Concept, design insights and dynamic performance", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 119, 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.11.030.
  3. Aslam, M., Islam, N., Zaheer, M.M. and Alam, M. (2013a), "Behaviour of double pendulum loading platform under the ocean current", Int. J. Innovat. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2(6), 2145-2152.
  4. Aslam, M., Islam, N., Zaheer, M.M. and Alam, M. (2013b), "Comparative response o f double hinged ALP using airy's and Stokes' wave theories", Int. J. Innovat. Res. Sci., Eng. Technol., 2(5), 1532-1539.
  5. Bae, Y.H. and Kim, M.H. (2011), "Discussion on Rotor-floater-mooring coupled dynamic analysis of mono-column-TLP-type FOWT (Floating Offshore Wind Turbine)", Ocean Syst. Eng., 1(3), 243-248. https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2011.1.3.243.
  6. Banik, A.K. and Datta, T.K. (2008), "Stability analysis of an articulated loading platform in regular sea", J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 3(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2815332.
  7. Banik, A.K. and Datta, T.K. (2009), "Stability analysis of TLP tethers under vortex-induced oscillations", J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., 131(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2948946.
  8. Bithin, G., Selvam, R.P. and Sundaravadivelu, R. (2015), "Hydrodynamic responses of a single hinged and double hinged articulated towers", Proceedings of the 34th Int. Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, May, Newfoundland, Canada.
  9. Chakrabarti, S.K. (2005), Handbook of Offshore Engineering. Plainfield, Elsevier.
  10. Chandrasekaran, S. and Kiran, P.A. (2018), "Mathieu stability of offshore Buoyant leg storage and regasification platform", Ocean Syst. Eng., 8(3), 345-360. https:// doi.org/10.12989/ose.2018.8.3.345.
  11. Chandrasekaran, S. and Madhuri, S. (2015), "Dynamic response of offshore triceratops: Numerical and experimental investigations", Ocean Eng., 109, 401-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.042.
  12. Chandrasekaran, S. and Nassery, J. (2017), "Nonlinear response of stiffened triceratops under impact and non-impact waves", Ocean Syst. Eng., 7(3), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2017.7.3.179.
  13. Chandrasekaran, S., Bhaskar, K., Harilal, L. and Brijith, R. (2010), "Dynamic response behaviour of multi-legged articulated tower with and without TMD", The Int. Conference on Marine Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  14. Chandrasekaran, S., Jain, A.K. and Chandak, N.R. (2007), "Response behavior of triangular tension leg platforms under regular waves using stokes nonlinear wave theory", J. Waterway, Port, Coast. Ocean Eng., 133(3), 230-237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2007)133:3(230).
  15. Chandrasekaran, S., Kumar, D. and Ramanthan, R. (2017), "Response control of tension leg platform with passive damper: experimental investigations", Ships Offshore Struct.. Newfoundland, Canada: Taylor & Francis, 12(1), 171-181. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/17445302.2015.1119666.
  16. Choi, A., Klein, V. and Hershberger, S. (2015), "Layout optimization for multi-platform offshore wind farm composed of spar-type floating wind turbines", Wind Struct., 20(6), 751-761. https://doi.org/10.12989/WAS.2015.20.6.751.
  17. Craig, R.R. (1981), Structural Dynamics: An Introduction to Computer Methods. John Wiley, New York.
  18. Dawson, T.H. (1983), Offshore Structural Engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
  19. Deng, J., Fan, F., Liu, P., Huang, S., and Lin, Y. (2019), "Aerodynamic characteristics of rigid coaxial rotor by wind tunnel test and numerical calculation", Chinese J. Aeronaut., Chinese Soc. Aeronaut. Astronaut., 32(3), 568-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2018.12.026.
  20. Donelan, M.A., Haus, B.K., Reul, N., Plant, W.J., Stiassnie, M., Graber, H.C. and Saltzman, E.S. (2004), "On the limiting aerodynamic roughness of the ocean in very strong winds", Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L18306. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019460.
  21. Elshafey, A.A., Haddara, M.R. and Marzouk, H. (2011), "Estimation of excitation and reaction forces for offshore structures by neural networks", Ocean Syst. Eng., 1(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2011.1.1.001.
  22. Fang, C., Li, Y., Chen, X. and Tang, H. (2019a), "Extreme response of a sea-crossing bridge tower under correlated wind and waves", J. Aeros. Eng., 32(6), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001083.
  23. Fang, C., Li, Y., Wei, K., Zhang, J. and Liang, C. (2019b), "Vehicle-bridge coupling dynamic response of sea-crossing railway bridge under correlated wind and wave conditions", Advan. Struct. Eng., 22(4), 893-906. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433218781423.
  24. Gavassoni, E., Goncalves, B.P. and Roehl, D.M. (2015), "Nonlinear vibration modes of an offshore articulated tower", Ocean Eng., 109, 226-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.08.028.
  25. Ghorai, B., Selvam, P. and Sundaravadivelu, R. (2015), "Hydrodynamic responses of a single hinged and double hinged articulated tower 415-24", Proc. of OMAE. Newfoundland, https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2015-41524.
  26. Gurley, K. and Kareem, A. (1993), "Gust loading factors for tension leg platforms", Appl. Ocean Res., 15(3), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-1187(93)90037-X.
  27. Han, C., Jung, S. and Park, S. (2014), "Hydrodynamic response of alternative floating substructures for spar-type offshore wind turbines", Wind Struct., 18(3), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.12989/WAS.2014.18.3.267.
  28. Hasan, S.D., Islam, N. and Moin, K. (2011), "Multihinged articulated offshore tower under vertical ground excitation", J. Struct. Eng., 137(April), 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000284.
  29. Ibrahim, A.E. and Jameel, M. (2018), "Wind induced response of spar-mooring-riser system", KSCE J. Civil Eng., 22(8), 2653- 2663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1914-x.
  30. Islam, N., Zaheer, M.M. and Ahmed, S. (2009a), "Double hinged articulated tower interaction with wind and waves", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 97(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2009.07.002.
  31. Islam, N., Zaheer, M.M. and Ahmed, S. (2009b), "Response of double hinged articulated tower platforms to wind forces", Wind Struct., 12(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2009.12.2.103.
  32. Jaksic, V., O'Shea, R., Cahill, P., Murphy, J., Mandic, D.P. and Pakrashi, V. (2015), "Dynamic response signatures of a scaled model platform for floating wind turbines in an ocean wave basin", Philosoph. Transactions Royal Soc. A: Mathem., Phys. Eng. Sci., 373(20). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0078.
  33. Jameel, M., Oyejobi, D.O., Siddiqui, N.A. and Sulong, N.H.R. (2016), "Nonlinear dynamic response of tension leg platform under environmental loads", KSCE J. Civil Eng., 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1240-8.
  34. Kareem, A. (1985). "Wind-induced response analysis of tension leg platforms", J. Struct. Engg, 111(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445.
  35. Kareem, A. and Dalton, C. (1982), "Dynamic effects of wind on tension Leg Platforms", Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference. Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
  36. Karimrad, M., Meissonnier, Q. and Moan, T. (2011), "Hydroelastic code-to-code comparison for a tension leg spar-type floating wind turbine, Marine Struct., 24(4), 412-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2011.05.006.
  37. Kim, C.M., Cho, J.R., Kim, S.R. and Lee, Y.S. (2017), "Monitoring system for the wind-induced dynamic motion of 1/100-scale spar-type floating offshore wind turbine", Wind Struct., 24(4), 333-350. https://doi.org/10.12989/WAS.2017.24.4.333.
  38. Kim, H.C. and Kim, M.H. (2015), "Global performances of a semi-submersible 5MW wind-turbine including second-order wave-diffraction effects", Ocean Syst. Eng., 5(3), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2015.5.3.139.
  39. Lamei, A. and Hayatdavoodi, M. (2020), "On motion analysis and elastic response of floating offshore wind turbines", J. Ocean Eng. Marine Energy, 6(1), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-019-00159-2.
  40. Lancelot, N. and Philip, V. (2016), "Effectiveness of spring mass dampers in articulated platform supporting offshore wind turbine", Int. J. Res. IT, Mang Eng, 6(8), 37-44.
  41. Liu, H., Chen, G., Lyu, T., Lin, H. Zhu, B. and Huang, A. (2016), "Wind-induced response of large offshore oil platform", Petroleum Explor. Develop., Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Petro China, 43(4), 708-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(16)30083-0.
  42. Ma, J., Zhou, D., Han, Z., Zhang, K., Bao, Y. and Dong, Li. (2019), "Fluctuating wind and wave simulations and its application in structural analysis of a semi-submersible offshore platform", Int. J. Naval Architect. Ocean Eng., 11(1), 624-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2018.11.001.
  43. Mitra, R.K., Banik, A.K., Datta, T.K. and Chatterjee, S. (2018), "Nonlinear roll oscillation of semisubmersible system and its control", Int. J. Nonlinear Mech., 107(September),42-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2018.10.006
  44. Myrhaug, D. (2007), "Wind gust spectrum over waves: Effect of wave age", Ocean Eng., 34, 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2006.01.003.
  45. Nagamani, K. and Ganapathy, C. (2000), "The dynamic response of a three-leg articulated tower", Ocean Eng., 27(12), 1455-1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(99)00049-9.
  46. Nagavinothini, R. and Chandrasekaran, S. (2019), "Dynamic analyses of o ff shore triceratops in ultra-deep waters under wind, wave, and current", Struct., 20(March), 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.04.009.
  47. Philip, V., Joseph, A. and Joy, C. M. (2015), "Three legged articulated support for 5 MW offshore wind turbine", Aquatic Procedia. 4(Icwrcoe), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.065.
  48. Ryu, C.S. and Yun, C.B. (1997), "Non-stationary response analysis of offshore guyed tower subjected to earthquake loading", Eng. Struct., 19(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00052-1.
  49. Sedillot, F., Dorris, C.G. and Stevenson, A. (1982), "Laminated rubber articulated joint for the deep water gravity tower", Proc. of 14th Annual Offshore Tech. Conf., 1, 341-350, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
  50. Solomon, K. and Kumar, D. (2019), "Optimal control for response reduction of single hinged articulated tower using MR-damper", Proceedings of OMAE, 3, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K.
  51. Vickery, P.J. (1995), "Wind-induced response of tension leg platform: Theory and Experiment", J. Struct. Eng., 121(4), 651-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(90)90087-S.
  52. Zaheer, M.M. and Islam, N. (2008), "Aerodynamic response of articulated towers: state-of-the-art", Wind Struct., 11(2), 97-120. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2008.11.2.097.
  53. Zaheer, M.M. and Islam, N. (2008), "Fluctuating wind induced response of double hinged articulated loading platform", Proc. of the 27th Int Conf. On Offshore Mech. Arctic Engg., 1, 723-731. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2008-57723.
  54. Zaheer, M.M. and Islam, N. (2009), "Dynamic response of articulated tower platforms to random sea environment", Proc. of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 1, 327-332. Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A.
  55. Zaheer, M.M. and Islam, N. (2009), "Fatigue and fracture reliability of articulated tower joint under random loading", Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE, 2, 277-283. Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A.
  56. Zaheer, M.M. and Islam, N. (2010), "Reliability analysis of universal joint of a compliant platform", Fatigue Fracture Eng. Mater. Struct., 33(7), 408-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01453.x.
  57. Zaheer, M.M. and Islam, N. (2012), "Stochastic response of a double hinged articulated leg platform under wind and waves", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aero., 111, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.08.005.
  58. Zaheer, M.M. and Islam, N. (2017), "Dynamic response of articulated towers under correlated wind and waves", Ocean Eng., 132, 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.01.019.
  59. Zaheer, M.M. and Islam, N. (2020a), "Effect of current on the dynamic response of a bi-articulated offshore tower", Advan. Struct. Eng., 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220930324.
  60. Zaheer, M.M. and Islam, N. (2020b), "Effect of wind field simulation approach on the response of a compliant offshore tower", Proc. of the The 2020 World Congress on Adv. in Civil, Environmental, and Materials Research, 25-28, August, Seoul, Korea.
  61. Zaheer, M.M., Islam, N. and Aslam, M. (2014), "Response of a double pendulum compliant offshore tower to collinear wave and current forces", Int. J. Innovat. Res. Sci., Eng. Technol., 3(1), 8398-8411.
  62. Zhang, B.L., Han, Q.L. and Zhang, X.M. (2017), "Recent advances in vibration control of offshore platforms", Nonlinear Dyn., 89(2), 755-771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3503-4.