DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

예비교사 소프트웨어(SW) 교육 역량 강화를 위한 언플러그드 활동 수업모형 개발

Development of Instructional Model of Unplugged activities for Improving SW Educational Competency of Pre-service Teachers

  • 투고 : 2021.07.22
  • 심사 : 2021.08.11
  • 발행 : 2021.08.31

초록

본 연구에는 국내의 예비교사 양성 기관의 현실에 맞도록 소프트웨어(SW)교육 역량 강화를 위해 예비교사들을 대상으로 언플러그드 활동을 위한 수업모형을 개발하는데 그 목적이 있다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 문헌탐색을 통해 1차 모형을 개발한 후, 이 모형의 최종사용자인 예비교사를 가르치는 교수자 1인을 대상으로 사용성 평가를 실시하였다. 그 다음 수업모형을 적용하여 설계된 언플러그드 수업에 참여한 예비교사들을 대상으로 모형에 대한 의견을 수렴하였다. 최종적으로 개발된 모형은 전문가 4인으로부터 타당화를 검증받았다. 본 연구의 모형은 크게 동기유발하기, 안내하기, 활동구성하기, 사례 체험하기, 확장하기 및 결과내기, 정리하기의 여섯 단계로 구성되며, 각각의 단계에서 요구되는 수업활동을 포함하고 있다. 최종 모형은 4인의 전문가에게 타당성을 검증받았으며, 본 연구의 논의점에 제안되었다.

The purpose of this study is to develop and validate an unplugged instructional model for pre-service teachers' SW competences in higher education. The unplugged instructional model was developed through the following procedures; 1) developing the 1st model based on the results of literature review, 2) getting test for use by one practicing instructor, 3) collecting the opinions of learners who participated in the unplugged instruction, and 4) getting model validation by 4 experts. The developed unplugged instructional model consists of 6 phases: 'stimulating of learners' motivation', 'introducing learning activities', 'constructing an activities', experiencing unplugged activities', 'extending and generating outcome of unplugged learning', and 'reflecting' in addition, each phase includes learning activities. The validation results confirm that the unplugged instructional model was both reliable.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2018년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2018S1A5B5A07071545)

참고문헌

  1. Brackmann, C. P., Roman-Gonzalez, M., Robles, G., Moreno-Leon, J., Casali, A., & Barone, D. (2017, November). Development of computational thinking skills through unplugged activities in primary school. In Proceedings of the 12th workshop on primary and secondary computing education (pp. 65-72).
  2. Kim, J. R. (2018). A study on systematic review of unplugged activity. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 22(1), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.1.103
  3. Cole, P. G., & Chan, L. K. S,(1987). Teaching principles and practice.
  4. Bell, T., Witten, I. H., & Fellows, M. (1998). Computer Science Unplugged: Off-line activities and games for all ages. Computer Science Unplugged.
  5. Bell, T., Lambert, L., & Marghitu, D. (2012, February). CS unplugged, outreach and CS kinesthetic activities. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 676-676).
  6. Bell, T., Alexander, J., Freeman, I., & Grimley, M. (2009). Computer science unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers. The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 13(1), 20-29.
  7. Bell, T., & Vahrenhold, J. (2018). CS unplugged-how is it used, and does it work?. In Adventures between lower bounds and higher altitudes (pp. 497-521). Springer, Cham.
  8. Jeon, .S. J., & Han, S. G. (2016). Development of UMC teaching and learning strategy for computational thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 20(2), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.20.2.131
  9. Noh, H.A., & Lee, W.G. (2011). An Application to the Unplugged activities by Pedagogical content knowledge of 'Commercial Information Department' in the professional curriculum. The Journal of Creative Informatics & Computing Education, 5(1), 35-40.
  10. Jeon, H. S., Kim, K. M., & Kim, S. S. (2012). The effect of unplugged algorithm learning on gifted and talented student's academic achievement. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 28(1), 111-127.
  11. Han, H. S., & Han, S. K. (2009). A case study on information education for pre-service teacher using unplugged computing. Journal of the korean association of information education, 13(1), 23-30.
  12. Han, S. K., & Kim, K. S. (2007). The Study on Unplugged Learning Method of Computer Science for Elementary School Students. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 11(4), 497-504.
  13. Faber, H. H., Wierdsma, M. D., Doornbos, R. P., van der Ven, J. S., & de Vette, K. (2017). Teaching computational thinking to primary school students via unplugged programming lessons. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 12, 13-24.
  14. Gardeli, A., & Vosinakis, S. (2017). Creating the computer player: an engaging and collaborative approach to introduce computational thinking by combining 'unplugged' activities with visual programming. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 36-50.
  15. Mano, C., Allan, V., & Cooley, D. (2010, October). Effective in-class activities for middle school outreach programs. In 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. F2E-1). IEEE.
  16. Seo, B.W., & Lee, S.J.(2012). The effects of the unplugged class according to learners' attributes. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 16(3), 291-298.
  17. Han, B. R. (2013). The Research of Unplugged Computing Method for Computational Thinking in Elementary Informatics Education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 17(2), 147-156.
  18. Curzon, P., McOwan, P. W., Plant, N., & Meagher, L. R. (2014, November). Introducing teachers to computational thinking using unplugged storytelling. In Proceedings of the 9th workshop in primary and secondary computing education (pp. 89-92).
  19. Jo, M. H. (2018). Analysis of Elementary Pre-service Teachers' Experiences and Understanding of Software Education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 22(1), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.1.81
  20. Suh, S. S., & Kim, S.W. (2011). Result Analysis of Training Programs for Stengthening Teacher's ICT Competency. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 16(10), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2011.16.10.111
  21. Kim, E. H., & Byun, H. S. (2015). Developing Guidelines for Training Program to Increase Faculty E-learning Competencies. The Journal of educational information and media, 21(4), 573-599.
  22. Kim, H.J., Heo, H.O., & Kim, E.Y. (2013). A Case Study on Development of Competency-Based Curriculum : Focusing on Teacher Training Program for SMART Education. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 279-299. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2013.29.2.279
  23. Jeon, Y.J. (2017). The Development and Application of a CT-CPS (Computational Thinking-based Creative Problem Solving) Instructional Model for the Software Education of New Curriculum (Doctoral dissertation, Dissertation of Korea National University of Education).
  24. Ko, K. I. (2018). A Study on the Instructional Model utilizing Scratch for Introductory Programming Classes of SW-Major Students. Convergence Security Journal, 18(2), 59-67.
  25. Silber, K. H. (2007). A Principle-Based Model of Instructional Design. Handbook of Improving Performance in the Workplace: Volumes 1-3, 23-52.
  26. Kil, Y.S. (2008). Problems, problem-solving strategies and frame of references of pre-service teachers observed in instructional planning processes. Journal of Research in Subject Matter Education, 12(2), 493-513.
  27. Park, K.Y. (2014). Development of Instructional Model for Secondary Pre-service Teachers' Instructional Design Practice. Journal of Educational Technology 30(2), 285-306. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.30.2.285
  28. Park, K.Y. (2014). Development of Instructional Model for Secondary Pre-service Teachers' Instructional Design Practice. Journal of Educational Technology 30(2), 285-306. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.30.2.285
  29. Brantley-Dias. L., & Calandra, B. (2007). A practical design model for novice teachers. Educational Technology, 47(4) 33-38.
  30. Richey, R. C., & Nelson, W. A. (1997). Developmental Research. In D. H. Jonassen(Ed.), Handbook of research for Educational Communication and Technology, 1213-1245, NY: Prentice Hall International.
  31. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. NJ: Routledge.
  32. Kim, H.S., Kim, H.Y., & Han, H.S. (2003). An Evaluation Model for Software Usability using Mental Model and Emotional factors. Journal of Computing Science and Engineering, 30(2), 117-128.
  33. Hong, H. M. (2017). A Study on Developing the Design Principles of Flipped Learning for STEAM Education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  34. Brush, T., Glazewski, K., Rurowski, K., Berg, K., Scromfors, C., Van-Nest, M. H., Stock, L., & Sutton, J. (2003). Integrating technology in field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ ASU project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 57-72 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504518
  35. Guba, L. & Lincoln, Y. (1981). Effective Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  36. Jang, S. Y., & Lee, J. J. (2015). Development of a Team-Based Learning Design Model in Higher Education. Asian Journal of Education, 16(1), 271-302. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2015.16.1.012
  37. Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social work research, 27(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94
  38. Prieto-Rodriguez, E., & Berretta, R. (2014, October). Digital technology teachers' perceptions of computer science: It is not all about programming. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 1-5.
  39. Seo, I. S., Kim, J. H., & Kim, T. Y. (2010). Research of Instructional Design on Unplugged Cooperative Learning, The Korean Assicition of Computer Education Conference Proceeding, 14(2), 63-68.
  40. Park, Y. S, Lee, M. J, & Lee, S. J. (2019). The Analysis of Design and Effect for Software Non-majors of Computing Education Model using Excel. Journal of Disidatal Contents Society. 20(10), 1969-1978 https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.10.1969
  41. Hur, K. (2019). An Education Method of Computational Thinking using Microbit in a Java-based SW Lecture for Non-major Undergraduates, Journal of practical enginerring education. 11(2), 167-174