DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlations between the Respiratory Function and Cervical and Lumbar Range of Motion in Elderly People

  • Park, Du-Jin (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Kim, Jun-Seok (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Biomedical Science, Kaya University) ;
  • Hwang, Young-In (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Life and Health Sciences, Hoseo University)
  • Received : 2021.06.04
  • Accepted : 2021.07.17
  • Published : 2021.08.31

Abstract

PURPOSE: The respiratory function and range of joint mobility deteriorate due to aging, respectively, and the respiratory function may be related to the range of joint mobility. To the best of the authors' knowledge, there has been little research on how the deterioration of the range of joint mobility caused by aging is related directly to the respiratory function. This study investigated the relationship between the respiratory function and the range of joint motion in the cervical and lumbar regions of older adults. METHODS: Thirty-two older adults participated in the study. The forced vital capacity (peak expiratory flow: PEF and forced expiratory volume in 1 second: FEV1) and the range of cervical joint motion were assessed in all subjects. The results were analyzed using the Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The respiratory function moderately correlated with age. A moderate correlation was observed between FEV1 and right cervical lateral flexion. PEF was moderately correlated with the lumbar lateral flexion. In addition, FEV1 correlated strongly with lumbar lateral flexion. CONCLUSION: The respiratory function was correlated with the cervical and lumbar lateral flexion. Therefore, rehabilitation of the respiratory function should involve improving the limited range of motion of the joints, and a stretching program is needed for older adults.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by RESEARCH FUND offered from the Catholic University of Pusan (2020).

References

  1. Zaugg M, Lucchinetti E. Respiratory function in the elderly. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2000;18(1):47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8537(05)70148-6
  2. Sharma G, Goodwin J. Effect of aging on respiratory system physiology and immunology. Clin Interv Aging. 2006;1(3):253-60. https://doi.org/10.2147/ciia.2006.1.3.253
  3. Guccione AA, Avers D, Wong R. Geriatric Physical Therapy (3rd ed.) St. Louis. Elsevier. 2011.
  4. Malmstrom EM, Karlberg M, Fransson PA, et al. Primary and coupled cervical movements: the effect of age, gender, and body mass index. A 3-dimensional movement analysis of a population without symptoms of neck disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(2):E44-E50. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000194841.83419.0b
  5. Kuhlman KA. Cervical range of motion in the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(10):1071-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(93)90064-h
  6. Intolo P, Milosavljevic S, Baxter DG, et al. The effect of age on lumbar range of motion: A systematic review. Man Ther. 2009:14(6):596-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2009.08.006
  7. Ludwig N, Gargano M, Formenti D, et al. Breathing training characterization by thermal imaging: a case study. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2012;14(3):41-7.
  8. Andersson EA, Oddsson LI, Grundstrom H, et al. EMG activities of the quadratus lumborum and erector spinae muscles during flexion-relaxation and other motor tasks. Clin Biomech. 1996;11(7):392-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(96)00033-2
  9. McGill SM, Juker D, Kropf P. Quantitative intramuscular myoelectric activity of quadratus lumborum during a wide variety of tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996;11(3):170-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(95)00056-9
  10. Phillips S, Mercer S, Bogduk N. Anatomy and biomechanics of quadratus lumborum. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008;222(2):151-9. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544119JEIM266
  11. De Permentier P. Quadratus lumborum: Anatomy, physiology and involvement in back pain. Journal of the Australian Traditional-Medicine Society. 2015;21(4): 241-2.
  12. Giannini D, Paggiaro PL, Cherson G, Bacci E, et al. Comparison between peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) during bronchoconstriction induced by different stimuli. J Asthma. 1997;34(2):105-11. https://doi.org/10.3109/02770909709075654
  13. Park RJ, Tsao H, Cresswell AG, et al. Differential activity of regions of the psoas major and quadratus lumborum during submaximal isometric trunk efforts. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(2):311-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21499
  14. Kazmi K, Hashmi GM, Ishaq H, Mehmood W. Effects of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Cervical and Lumbar spinal mobility. National Journal of Medical and Health Sciences (NJMHS). 2020, 2(1):31-7.
  15. Pelkonen, AS, Kikander K, Turpeinen M. Reproducibility of home spirometry in children with newly diagnosed asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000;29(1):34-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(200001)29:1<34::AID-PPUL6>3.0.CO;2-O
  16. Keskinen, H, Piirila P, Nordman H, Nurminen M. Pocket-sized spirometer for monitoring bronchial challenge procedures. Clin Physiol. 1996;16(6):633-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097x.1996.tb00740.x
  17. Tschopp JM, Roulin JP, Juilland A, et al. Evaluation of the reliability of 2 portable electronic spirometers. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1988;118(38):1382-5.
  18. Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer: a technical report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(3):306-13.
  19. Wolfenberger VA, Bui Q., Batenchuk GB. A comparison of methods of evaluating cervical range of motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002;25(3):154-60. https://doi.org/10.1067/mmt.2002.122327
  20. MacDermid JC, Arumugam V, Vincent JI, Carroll KL. The reliability and validity of the c computerized double inclinometer in measuring lumbar mobility. Open Orthop J. 2014;8:355-60. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001408010355
  21. Janssens JP, Pache JC, Nicod LP. Physiological changes in respiratory function associated with ageing. Eur Respir J. 1999;13(1):197-205. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.99.14614549
  22. Fletcher C, Peto R. The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction. Br Med J. 1977;1(6077):1645-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.6077.1645
  23. Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(1):179-87. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9712108
  24. Fowler RW, Pluck RA, Hetzel MR. Maximal expiratory flow-volume curves in Londoners aged 60 years and over. Thorax. 1987;42(3):173-82. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.42.3.173
  25. Knudson RJ, Lebowitz MD, Holberg CJ, et al. Changes in the normal maximal expiratory flow-volume curve with growth and aging. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;127(6):725-34.
  26. Bunki H, Shibata N, Yorimoto A. Functional characteristics and measurement significance of respiratory muscle strength in the elderly. Health Evaluation & Promotion. 2013;40(4):451-6. https://doi.org/10.7143/jhep.40.451
  27. Lalley PM. The aging respiratory system--pulmonary structure, function and neural control. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2013;187(3):199-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2013.03.012
  28. Chen J, Solinger AB, Poncet JF, et al. Meta-analysis of normative cervical motion. Spine. 1999;24(5):1571-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199908010-00011
  29. Feipel V, Rondelet B, Le Pallec J, et al. Normal global motion of the cervical spine: an electrogoniometric study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999;14(7):462-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(98)90098-5
  30. Walmsley RP, Kimber P, Culham E. The effect of initial head position on active cervical axial rotation range of motion in two age populations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(21):2435-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199611010-00005
  31. Einkauf DK, Gohdes ML, Jensen GM, et al. Changes in spinal mobility with increasing age in women. Phys Ther. 1987;67(3):370-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.3.370
  32. Mayer TG, Tencer AF, Kristoferson S, Mooney V. Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range of motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984;9(6):588-95. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198409000-00009
  33. Saidu IA, Maduagwu SM, Abbas AD, et al. Lumbar spinal mobility changes among adults with advancing age. J Midlife Health. 2011;2(2):65-71.
  34. Lopez-de-Uralde-Villanueva I, Sollano-Vallez E, Del Corral T. Reduction of cervical and respiratory muscle strength in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain and having moderate to severe disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(21):2495-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1337239
  35. Campbell EJM. The role of the scalene and sternomastoid muscles in breathing in normal subjects; an electromyographic study. J Anat. 1955;89(Pt 3):378-86.
  36. Lyall RA, Donaldson N, Polkey MI, et al. Respiratory muscle strength and ventilatory failure in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 10):2000-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.10.2000
  37. Legrand A, Schneider E, Gevenois PA, et al. Respiratory effects of the scalene and sternomastoid muscles in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2003;94(4):1467-72. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00869.2002
  38. De Rui M, Marini I, Bartolucci ML, et al. Pressure pain threshold of the cervico-facial muscles in healthy elderly people: the role of gender, age and dominance. Gerodontology. 2015;32(4):274-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12117
  39. Oatis CA. Mechanics and pathomechanics of the muscle of the thoracic spine, kinesiology: The mechanics and pathomechanics of human movement. Philadelphia. PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2004.
  40. Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: Foundations for rehabilitation. 2nd ed. St. Louis. Elsevier. 2010.
  41. Wallden M. The diaphragm - More than an inspired design. J Bodyw Move Ther. 2017;21(2):342-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.03.013
  42. Bordoni B, Varacallo M. Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis, Quadratus Lumborum. Treasure Island. StatPearls Publishing. 2021.
  43. Kim MS. Neck kinematics and sternocleidomastoid muscle activation during neck rotation in subjects with forward head posture. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(11): 3425-28. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.3425
  44. Myers TW. Anatomy trains: Myofacial Meridians for Manual and Movement Therapists. 3rd Edi. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone. 2014.
  45. Holguera RM, Nievesa AIT, Torresa RR, et al. The effects of truncal adiposity in forced spirometery: sex differences. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2018:247:167-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2017.10.009
  46. Hwang J, Jung MC. Age and sex differences in ranges of motion and motion patterns. Occup Ergon. 2015;21(2):173-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1029301
  47. Palazzi C, Miralles R, Soto MA, Santander H, Zuniga C, et al. Body position effects on EMG activity of sternocleidomastoid and masseter muscles in patients with myogenic cranio-cervical-mandibular dysfunction. Cranio. 1996;14(3):200-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.1996.11745969
  48. Ballenberger N, von Piekartz H, Paris-Alemany A, et al. Influence of different upper cervical positions on electromyography activity of the masticatory muscles. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35(4):308-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.020