DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Practical Problem-Based Home Economics Instruction (PPBHEI) on Middle School Students' Creativity: Focusing on the Content on "Clothing Management and Recycling"

실천적 문제 중심 가정과 수업이 중학생의 창의성에 미치는 효과: '의복 관리와 재활용' 내용 요소를 중심으로

  • Bae, Ja-Young (Korea National University of Education Graduate School) ;
  • Shim, Huen-Sup (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Chae, Jung-Hyun (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 배자영 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과) ;
  • 심현섭 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과) ;
  • 채정현 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과)
  • Received : 2021.06.07
  • Accepted : 2021.07.28
  • Published : 2021.08.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the effects of Practical Problem-Based Home Economics Instruction (PPBHEI) on middle school students' creativity, focusing on the content on "clothing management and recycling." This study carried out quasi-experimental research with an independent variable of PPBHEI and a dependent variable of creativity. The experiment was based on a sample of 62 (31 in each group) second grade students in the Cheongju area over four class hours. ANCOVA was performed to examine pre-test and post-test differences between the experimental group and the control group. The results showed that PPBHEI did not improve the level of creativity but improved the level of creative motivation among the sub-elements of creativity (creative thinking, creative tendency, creative motivation). In particular, PPBHEI improved the level of independence in creative tendency, intrinsic motivation, and diligence in creative motivation. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that PPBHEI is effective in improving independence, intrinsic motivation, and diligence in respect of middle school students'creativity.

Keywords

References

  1. Basadur M. (1994). Simplex: A flight to creativity. Buffalo, NY: The Creative Education Foundation.
  2. Brown, M. M. (1980). What is home economics education? Minneapolis. Prentice Hall, Inc.
  3. Byun, H. J., & Chae, J. H. (2002). The effect of practical reasoning instruction in home economics on the critical thinking: focusing on family relations and resource management. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 14(3), 1-9.
  4. Chae, J. H. (1999). The effects of practical reasoning instruction in home economics and other factors on korean high shcool female students' decision making skills. Journal of Korean Home Economics, 37(3), 43-61.
  5. Chae, J. H., Park, M. J., Kim, S. G., & Han, J. (2017). Home economics education(2nd edition). Paju: Gyomunsa Co.
  6. Chae, J. H., Park, M. J., Kim, S. G., Yoo, N. S., Han, J., & Heo, Y. S. (2019). Home economics education practicing happy learning, teaching methods, and class performance. Paju: Gyomunsa Co.
  7. Chae, J. H., Yoo, T. M., Park, M. J., & Lee, J. Y. (2003). The effect of practical reasoning home economics instruction on morality of middle school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics, 41(12), 53-68.
  8. Cho, H. J., & Lee, G. H. (2004). The analysis and the effect of the practical problem solving method of the clothing chapter in middle school home economics and technology in the 7th curriculum. Secondary Education Research, 52(2), 385-417.
  9. Cho, S. Y. (2016). Changes in critical thinking tendency and clothing attitude among middle school students via practical reasoning home economics instruction(Unpublished master's thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  10. Cho, Y. S. (2013). Inquiry of teaching-learning model nurturing student creativity. The Journal of Thinking Development 9(2), 1-22.
  11. Cho, Y. S., Sung, J. S., & Lee, H. S. (2008). Creativity education : developing creative problem-solving abilities. Ewha womans University Publishing department.
  12. Chung, M. K. (2002). Relationship between multiple intelligence and creativity of middle and high school students and family and academic achievement. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 14(3), 51-64.
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Haper/Collins.
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-335). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Guilford, J. P. (1959). Traits of Creativity. In: Anderson, H. H., Ed., Creativity and Its Cultivation(pp. 142-161). New York: Harper & Row.
  16. Heinzen, T. E., Mills, C., & Cameron, P. (1993). Scientific innovation potential. Creativity Research Journal, 6(3), 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419309534482
  17. Kim, E. J., & Lee, Y. S. (2009). Developing and implementing practical problem based lesson plan to improve self-leadership skills - focusing on the unit of 'youth's self management' in middle school technology.home economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 21(4), 35-54.
  18. Kim, Y. S., & Lee, Y. S. (2010). The effect of library assisted practical problembased home economics instruction on student's consciousness and attitude of 'life and career planning'. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(2), 61-79.
  19. Laster, J. F. (1982). A practical action teaching model. Journal of Home Economics, 74(3), 41-44.
  20. Lee, D. W. (2009). A practical approach to creativity education. Gyeonggi-do: History of Education and Science.
  21. Lee, H. M. (1998). The effects of practical reasoning instruction in home economics on high school female students' creativity(unpublished master's thesis). Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  22. Lee, H. S., & Yoo, T. M. (2009). He effect of school library-assisted instruction on academic achievement in home economics education. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 21(1), 203-215.
  23. Lee, J. Y. (2013). Development and application of problem based learning(PBL) teaching.learning process plan applying creative thinking technique: focusing on the content of 'clothing life culture'of technology.home economics for the high school(unpublished master's thesis). Korea National University of Education, Chung-Buk, Korea.
  24. Lee, M. J. (2010). Analysis of a revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives and practical reasoning process presented in home economics textbooks of 2007 revised curriculum(unpublished master's thesis). Gyeong sang National University, Jinju, Korea.
  25. Lee, S. H., & Lee, H. J. (2012). The effects of eco-friendly clothing teaching through future problem solving program(FPSP) on creative character cultivation : focusing on the 'home life culture'unit of technology.home economics for the high school first grader, Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 24(3), 143-173.
  26. Lubart, T. (2010). Cross-cultural perspectives on creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity(pp. 265-278). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.017
  27. Ministry of education (2015). Practical arts(technology and home economics) curriculum/informatics subject matter education.
  28. Moon, H. K. (2017, May). A study on the changes in the era of the 4th industrial revolution and the direction of clothing education in home economics education. Paper presented at the 2017 Spring Korean Home Economics Education Association, 57-78. Seoul, Korea.
  29. Moon, S. H., & Chae, J. H. (2001). The effects of practical reasoning home economics instruction applied to food & nutrition units on female high school students' morality. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 13(3), 119-130.
  30. Oh, K. S. (2018). Action research of home economics class based on a critical science perspective for the improvement of empowerment: focusing on clothing and textiles area of 「Technology.home economics」 in the middle school(unplished doctoral dissertation). Seoul National Universit, Seoul, Korea.
  31. Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.
  32. Park, M. J. (2012). The development teaching models for creativity and personality education in home economics education. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 24(3), 35-56.
  33. Park, M. J., & Kim, Y. A. (2011). Development of creativity and personality class models in home economics education. Paper presented at the winter conference of Korean Home Economics Association, 25-68.
  34. Park, Y. S. (2014). A study on the educational program planning utilizing picture books in terms of creativity system model of Csizentmihalyi. Journal of the Korean Society Design Culture, 20(2), 175-186.
  35. Reid, W. D. (1979). Practical reasoning and curriculum theory: In search of a new paradigm. Curriculum Inquiry, 9, 187-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1979.11075606
  36. Ryu, S. H. (2001). The theoretical inquiry for teaching creativity in home economics education. Korean journal of human ecology, 10(2), 215-224.
  37. So, K. H. (2016). A review of main issues surrounding creativity in school education: Implications for curriculum study. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(4), 100-119.
  38. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
  39. Urban, K. K. (1995). Creativity: A component approach model. A paper presented at the 11th. World Conference in Hong Kong, July 31-Aug, 4, 1995.
  40. Woo, H. J., & Lee, Y. J. (2010, December). Teaching-learning strategies in dressing and self-expression. Paper presented at the winter conference of Korean Home Economics Association, 145-172. Seoul, Korea.
  41. Yoo, J. H., & Lee, Y. S. (2013). Development of practical problem based teachinglearning plans and evaluation of its effectiveness on middle school students' self efficacy, ego resilience and happiness: focused on the unit 'youth's self management' in middle school technology.home economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 25(4). 79-98.
  42. Yoon, B. S., & Chae, J. H. (1998). Effects of practical problem - based home economics instruction perceived by both female and male high school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 36(5), 151-166.