Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

The Korean Neurosurgical Society (대한신경외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Physiologic Cervical Alignment Change between Cervical Spine X-ray and Computed Tomography

  • Lee, Ho Jin (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Il Sup (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Hong, Jae Taek (Department of Neurosurgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2020.11.17
  • Accepted : 2021.01.13
  • Published : 2021.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlations among various radiological parameters used to determine cervical alignment from cervical spine radiographs (X-CS) and cervical spine computed tomography (CT-CS), both within and between modalities. Methods : This study included 168 patients (≤60 years old) without a definite whole spine deformity who underwent CT-CS and X-CS. We measured occipital slope (O-s), C1 slope, C2 slope, C7 slope, sella turcica - C7 sagittal vertical axis (StC7-SVA), spino-cranial angle, T1 slope, and C27-SVA. We calculated the O-C2 angle, O-C7 angle, and C2-7 angle from the measured parameters and conducted correlation analyses among multiple parameters. Results : The intrinsic correlation features among multiple cervical parameters were very similar for both X-CS and CT-CS. The two SVA parameters (C27-SVA and StC7-SVA) were mainly influenced by the upper cervical slope parameters (r=|0.13-0.74|) rather than the lower slope cervical parameters (r=|0.08-0.13|). The correlation between X-CS and CT-CS for each radiological parameter was statistically significant (r=0.26-0.44) except for O-s (r=0.10) and StC7-SVA (r=0.11). Conclusion : The correlation patterns within X-CS and CT-CS were very similar in this study. The correlation between X-ray and CT was statistically significant for most radiological parameters, and the correlation score increased when the horizontal gaze was consistently maintained. The lower cervical parameters were not statistically associated with translation-related parameters (C2-7 SVA and StC7-SVA). Therefore, the upper cervical segment may be a better predictor for determining head and neck translation.

Keywords

References

  1. Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK, Schwab FJ, Le Huec JC, Massicotte EM, et al. : Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(22 Suppl 1) : S149-S160, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f449
  2. Beltsios M, Savvidou O, Mitsiokapa EA, Mavrogenis AF, Kaspiris A, Efstathopoulos N, et al. : Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after neck injury. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23 Suppl 1 : S47-S51, 2013
  3. Cheng J, Liu P, Sun D, Ma Z, Liu J, Wang Z, et al. : Correlation of cervical and thoracic inlet sagittal parameters by MRI and radiography in patients with cervical spondylosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98 : e14393, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014393
  4. Janusz P, Tyrakowski M, Glowka P, Offoha R, Siemionow K : Influence of cervical spine position on the radiographic parameters of the thoracic inlet alignment. Eur Spine J 24 : 2880-2884, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4023-x
  5. Jouibari MF, Le Huec JC, Ranjbar Hameghavandi MH, Moghadam N, Farahbakhsh F, Khadivi M, et al. : Comparison of cervical sagittal parameters among patients with neck pain and healthy controls: a comparative cross-sectional study. Eur Spine J 28 : 2319-2324, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06117-8
  6. Jun HS, Chang IB, Song JH, Kim TH, Park MS, Kim SW, et al. : Is it possible to evaluate the parameters of cervical sagittal alignment on cervical computed tomographic scans? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 : E630- E636, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000281
  7. Kim JT, Lee HJ, Choi DY, Shin MH, Hong JT : Sequential alignment change of the cervical spine after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the lower cervical spine. Eur Spine J 25 : 2223-2232, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4401-z
  8. Le Huec JC, Saddiki R, Franke J, Rigal J, Aunoble S : Equilibrium of the human body and the gravity line: the basics. Eur Spine J 20 Suppl 5 : 558-563, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1939-7
  9. Lee HD, Jeon CH, Chung NS, Kwon HJ : Comparative analysis of three imaging modalities for evaluation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters: a validity and reliability study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42 : 1901-1907, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002256
  10. Lee HJ, Kim JH, Kim IS, Hong JT : Physiologic cervical alignment change between whole spine radiographs and normal standing cervical radiographs. World Neurosurg 122 : e1222-e1227, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.019
  11. Lee SH, Kim KT, Seo EM, Suk KS, Kwack YH, Son ES : The influence of thoracic inlet alignment on the craniocervical sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults. J Spinal Disord Tech 25 : E41-E47, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182396301
  12. Liu W, Fan J, Bai J, Tang P, Chen J, Luo Y, et al. : Magnetic resonance imaging: a possible alternative to a standing lateral radiograph for evaluating cervical sagittal alignment in patients with cervical disc herniation? Medicine (Baltimore) 96 : e8194, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008194
  13. Nunez-Pereira S, Hitzl W, Bullmann V, Meier O, Koller H : Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: an analysis of occipitocervical and spinopelvic interdependence, with C-7 slope as a marker of cervical and spinopelvic alignment. J Neurosurg Spine 23 : 16-23, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.11.SPINE14368
  14. Park JH, Cho CB, Song JH, Kim SW, Ha Y, Oh JK : T1 slope and cervical sagittal alignment on cervical CT radiographs of asymptomatic persons. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 53 : 356-359, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2013.53.6.356
  15. Qiao J, Zhu F, Liu Z, Xu L, Zhu Z, Qian B, et al. : Measurement of thoracic inlet alignment on MRI: reliability and the influence of body position. Clin Spine Surg 30 : E377-E380, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000306
  16. Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Acosta FL Jr, Protopsaltis TS, Blondel B, et al. : Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine 19 : 141-159, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12838
  17. Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS, Deviren V, Bess S, Hart RA, et al. : The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 71 : 662-669; discussion 669, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826100c9
  18. Weng C, Wang J, Tuchman A, Wang J, Fu C, Hsieh PC, et al. : Influence of T1 slope on the cervical sagittal balance in degenerative cervical spine: an analysis using kinematic MRI. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41 : 185-190, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001353