The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Applicability of Protocol to Improve Curriculum Literacy for Special Education Pre-Teachers

예비특수교사들의 특수교육교육과정 문해력 향상을 위한 프로토콜 적용 가능성 탐색

  • 이옥인 (전주대학교 중등특수교육과) ;
  • 박은영 (전주대학교 중등특수교육과)
  • Received : 2021.06.25
  • Accepted : 2021.07.31
  • Published : 2021.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We performed to explore the applicability of protocol to improve the curriculum literacy for special education pre-teachers. For this, protocol of Park et al (2018), which can be used in the educational field, was partially modified and applied to enhance the special education curriculum expertise of pre-teachers. The literacy protocol of the special education curriculum was applied as Protocols 1 and 2, and Protocol 1 was focused on adaptation the 2015 special education curriculum and understanding literacy. Protocol 2 consisted of reorganizing the subject level centering on the five subjects presented in the special education curriculum, and establishing an integrated theme setting and reorganization plan. We applied the research design during a total of 15 weeks of special education curriculum subjects. The class format was flipped learning (e.g, pre-video lectures, theory lectures (E-Sheets), and learner-led activities (W-Sheets) for each topic was carried out. We found that pre-teachers' thought that the academic achievement and satisfaction of students with disabilities could be increased by adaptation the curriculum. Pre-teachers reported that the experience of reorganizing each subject/intersection helped improve their literacy but found it difficult.

이 연구는 특수교육과정 문해력 향상을 위한 프로토콜을 개발하고 이를 적용하여 교육현장에서 프코토콜이 예비특수교사들의 특수교육교육과정 문해력 향상을 위해 적용될 수 있는지를 탐색하기 위해 실행되었다. 이를 위해 박윤경 등(2018)의 교육과정 문해력 프로토콜을 일부 수정하여 적용하였다. 특수교육교육과정 문해력 프로토콜은 프로토콜 1, 2로 적용되었으며, 프로토콜 1은 2015 특수교육교육과정 재구성과 문해력을 이해하는 것을 중심으로 진행되었다. 프로토콜 2는 해당 특수교육교육과정에 제시된 5개 교과를 중심으로 교과수준을 재구성하고, 통합적 주제 설정 및 재구성 계획을 세우는 내용으로 구성되었다. 프로토콜은 총 15주차 특수교육교육과정 교과목에 적용되었다. 수업 형태는 역진행수업을 통해 교육과정 전반에 대한 사전 동영상 강의가 제공되었으며, 학습자중심의 자기주도 활동지를 작성하는 형태로 진행되었다. 연구결과 예비특수교사들은 교육과정 재구성을 통해 장애학생의 학업성취와 만족감을 높일 수 있다고 인식하였으며, 교과별/간 재구성 경험이 문해력 향상에 도움이 되었지만 어렵게 느껴짐을 보고하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. D. Steiner, "Curriculum Literacy in Schools of Education? The Hole at the Center of American Teacher Preparation," Baltimore: Johns Hopkins School of Education, 2018.
  2. E. Oh, J. Kim, and C. Park, "Special Education Teachers' Perceptions and Concern Stages of 2011 Special Education Curriculum," The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 283-301, 2014.
  3. Ministry of Education, "2015 Special Education Curriculum," Sejong: Ministry of Education, 2015.
  4. Z. Li, and H. Li, "Making Materials Use in Language Classrooms Visible: Evidence from Two University English Teachers in China," Cogent Education, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1870802
  5. D. Kim, "The Role of Teachers in the 2019 Revised Nuri Curriculum and Exploring the Possibilities as an Emergent Curriculum," The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 343-351, 2021. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2021.7.1.343
  6. J. Saphier, M.A. Haley-Speca, and R. Gower, "The Skillful Teacher: The Comprehensive Resource for Improving Teaching and Learning (7th ed.)," Boston: Research for Better Teaching, 2017.
  7. Y. Park, M. Kim, and J. Chang, "A Study on the Development and Applicability of the Curriculum Literacy Protocol for the Professional Learning Community," Journal of Education & Culture, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 31-56, 2018. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2018.24.5.31
  8. K. Jo, "A Study on the Implementation of Global Citizenship Education in Primary English Education through the Teachers' Curriculum Literacy," Primary English Education, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 31-53, 2020. https://doi.org/10.25231/pee.2020.26.2.31
  9. K.S. Jung, "Study on the Teachers' curriculum Literacy," Journal of Curriculum Integration, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 109-132, 2012.
  10. Y. Bolat, "The Concept of Education Program Literacy and Education Program Literacy Scale," Electronic Turkish Studies, Vol. 12, No. 18, 2017. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12103
  11. S. Sural, "An Examination of Pre-service Teachers' Competencies in Lesson Planning," Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 1-13, 2019. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i3.3902
  12. H.H. Ozkan, "An Analysis of Teachers' Opinions about their Knowledge of Curriculum Terms Awareness," Universal Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 1601-1613, 2016. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.216.040713
  13. S. Aslan, "An Analysis of Prospective Teachers' Curriculum Literacy Levels in Terms of Reading and Writing," Universal Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 973-979, 2019. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070408
  14. R.C. Bogdan, and S.K. Biklen, "Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods (5th ed)," Boston: Alln & Bacon, 2007.
  15. J.W. Creswell, "Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design," London: Sage, 2002.
  16. S. Mathison, "Why Triangulate?," Educational research, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 13-17, 1988. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174583
  17. L.S. Shulman, "Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform," Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 1-14, 1987. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  18. E.Y. Park, and O. Lee, "Meta-Analysis of Variables Influencing Teacher's Perception of Special Education Curriculum," Journal of Special Education for Curriculum and Instruction, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 101-115, 2021. https://doi.org/10.24005/seci.2021.14.1.101
  19. O. Lee, "Analysis of Science and E-book Application for Universal Design for Learning for Students with Disabilities," The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 4-14, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2020.6.4.9