Journal of Technology Innovation (기술혁신연구)

Korea Society for Innovation Managemetn & Economics (기술경영경제학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Establishing Strategy of Living Lab Utilization to Enhance Energy Sector Innovation

에너지 섹터의 혁신성 제고를 위한 리빙랩 활용 전략 수립에 관한 연구

  • 최광훈 (한양대 기술경영전문대학원) ;
  • 권규현 (한양대 기술경영전문대학원)
  • Received : 2020.09.16
  • Accepted : 2021.02.07
  • Published : 2021.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, an exploratory analysis study was conducted on establishing a strategy to utilize living labs to enhance the innovation of the energy sector. Through the previous research literature, it was possible to confirm the concept, essential components, innovation characteristics of living labs, and types of innovation issues in the energy sector as the theoretical background. Based on this, the case studies of energy living lab (8 overseas, 1 domestic) were analyzed focusing on the possibility of utilizing living lab as an approach to innovation issues in the energy sector, establishing a customized strategy for essential components of living lab and enhancing innovation. It was confirmed that the establishment of a customized strategy for the essential components of the living lab could be a driving force in enhancing innovation, and the Living Lab is effectively used as an approach method for innovation issues(demand management, supply technology, enhance R&D acceptance and promote commercialization, technology policies) in the energy sector. As a result of the case studies, the driving force of each living lab was derived from the viewpoint of contributing to innovation, and strategies for using the living labs for each energy innovation problem were established. This study is an exploratory and descriptive analytical study of the utilization strategy and value of the living lab model as an approach to innovation issues in the energy field, which can provide a living lab strategy framework that has not been tried in the past and enables living lab activation and network formation. It can also be considered to have academic, practical, and policy implications in that it can also contribute.

본 논문에서는 에너지 섹터의 혁신성 제고를 위한 리빙랩(Living Labs) 활용 전략 수립에 관한 탐색적 분석 연구를 수행하였다. 기존 연구문헌을 통해 이론적 배경이 되는 리빙랩의 개념, 필수 구성요소, 혁신성 특성과 에너지 섹터의 혁신 이슈 유형을 확인할 수 있었다. 이를 토대로 리빙랩 필수 구성요소의 맞춤형 전략 수립과 혁신성 제고와의 연관성, 에너지 섹터에서의 혁신 이슈에 대한 접근으로 리빙랩 활용 가능성에 대해 에너지 리빙랩 사례 연구(해외 8건, 국내 1건)을 통해 분석되었다. 연구 결과, 리빙랩 필수 구성요소의 맞춤형 전략 수립이 혁신성 제고에 동인으로 작용 될 수 있으며, 리빙랩이 에너지 섹터의 혁신 이슈(수요관리, 공급기술, 기술사업화 촉진 및 수용성, 기술정책)에 대한 접근 방법론으로 효과적으로 활용 될 수 있음을 확인되었다. 사례연구 결과 기반으로 혁신성 기여 관점에서 리빙랩 사례별 동인을 도출하고 에너지 혁신이슈별 리빙랩 활용 전략을 수립하였다. 본 연구는 에너지 섹터에서의 혁신이슈에 대한 접근으로 리빙랩 모델의 활용 전략과 그 가치에 대한 탐색적, 기술적 분석 연구로서 종래에 시도되지 않았던 리빙랩 활용 전략 프레임워크를 제공할 수 있고, 에너지 리빙랩 활성화와 네트워크 형성에도 기여될 수 있다는 점에서 학술적·실용적·정책적 함의가 있다고 볼 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김준한, 한재각(2018), "에너지 전환 실험의 장으로서 한국 리빙랩의 경험", 「과학기술학연구」, 제 18권 1호, pp.219-265. https://doi.org/10.22989/JSTS.2018.18.1.005
  2. 박진희 (2020), "전환적 혁신 정책의 관점에서 본 재생에너지 기술혁신 정책", 「기술혁신학회지」, 제 23권 2호, pp. 234-257.
  3. 박정민(2017), "국내 리빙랩의 혁신성 분석- 제품 개발 리빙랩 사례를 중심으로", 이화여자대 대학원 학위 논문
  4. 박종구(2013),"한국 에너지 기술 혁신체제 분석 및 개선방안 연구", 「에너지공학」, 제22권 제3호, pp.312-325. https://doi.org/10.5855/ENERGY.2013.22.3.312
  5. 박종문, 윤순진(2016), "서울시 성대골 사례를 통해 본 도시 지역 공동체 에너지 전환 운동에서의 에너지 시민성 형성 과정", 「공간과사회」, 제26권 1호 통권 제 55호,pp.79-138.
  6. 산업연구원(2017), "4차 산업혁명 시대의 에너지 정책", 2017 산업통상자원부-산업연구원 정책협의회.
  7. 성지은, 송위진, 박인용(2013), "리빙랩의 운영 체계와 사례", 「STEPI Insight」, 제127호, pp.1-46.
  8. 성지은, 한규영 ,박인용 (2016), "국내 리빙랩의 현황과 과제", 「STEPIInsight」, 제 184호, pp.1-44.
  9. 송위진(2012), "LivingLab 사용자 주도의 개방형 혁신 모델", 「STEPI Issues & Policy」, 제 59호, pp.1-14.
  10. 송위진, 성지은 (2013), "사회문제 해결을 위한 과학기술혁신정책", 한울.
  11. 송위진, 성지은 (2019), "'전환적 혁신정책'의 관점에서 본 사회문제 해결형 R&D정책 : '제2차 과학 기술 기반 사회 문제 해결 종합계획'을 중심으로", 「과학기술학연구」, 제19권 22호, pp.85-116.
  12. 최광훈(2020), "정부에너지 R&D사업의 기술 사업화 성과요인 도출에 관한 연구", 한양대 대학원 학위논문.
  13. Alcortra(2011), "Best Practices Database for Living Labs", Alcotra Innovation Project.
  14. Alcortra(2013), "How to set up cross-border Living Labs: The Alcotra innovation experience handbook", European Regional Development Fund, European Union.
  15. Andrews, R. et al.(2016), "Energy use, behavioral change, and business organizations: Reviewing recent findings and proposing a future research agenda", Energy Research & Social Science, 11, pp.195 - 208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.09.001
  16. Ben Cowley, et. al.(2011), "Learning Principles and Interaction Design for 'Green My Place': A Massively Multiplayer Serious Game" Entertainment Computing, Computer Aided Learning conference 2011.
  17. Birgitta Bergvall-Karebom(2009), "A milieu for innovation defining living labs", In Proceedings of the ISPIM Innovation Symposium, New York City, USA, p.12.
  18. Carmelina Cosmi et al.(2018), "Schools4energy: a living laboratory for energy awareness in schools", Research and Innovation Conference Proceedings, ENoLL Open Living Lab Days 2018.
  19. CISMOB Interreg Europe(2017), LIGHTING LIVING LAB-Open Innovation in Lighting.
  20. Crawford J, French W.(20008), "A low-carbon future: Spatial planning's role in enhancing technological innovation in the build environment", EnergPolicy 36, pp. 4575 - 4579.
  21. De Boer J, Zuidema C.(2015), "Towards an Integrated Energy Landscape", Urban Des Plan.
  22. Dupont et ai.(2019), "Trust and Technology: Two Dimensions of Open and Agile Innovation applied to Energy", Technology and innovation. ISTE.
  23. Eriksson, et al.(2005), "State-of-the-Art in Utilizing living Labs Approach to User-centric ICT innovation - a European approach", CDT at Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, Nokia Oy, Centre for Knowledge and Innovation Research at Helsinki Scholl of Economics.
  24. European Commission(2010), "Advancing and applying Living Lab methodologies: An update on Living Labs for user-driven open innovation in the ICT domain".
  25. European Network of Living Labs (ENaLL). Available at: http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/
  26. F. Fahy, G. Goggins, C.L. Jensen (2019), "Energy Demand Challenges in Europe: Implications For policy, Planning and Practice", Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  27. Giannouli.et al.(2018), "A methodological approach for holistic energy planning using the living lab concept : the case of the prefecture of Karditsa". European Journal of Environmental Sciences,Vol.8,No.1, pp.14 - 22. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361964.2018.3
  28. Henderson,R.M.,et al.(2011), "Accelerating Energy Innovation: Insights from Multiple Sectors", Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  29. IEA(2019), World Energy Outlook 2019
  30. IEA(2015), Energy Technology Perspective 2015, Mobilising Innovation to Accelerate Climate Action.
  31. John Krogstie,et al.(2013), "Using a living Lab Methodology for Developing Energy Saving Solution", Proceedings of the Nme teenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois, August 15-17.
  32. Katariina Malmberg(2017), "U4IoT Living Lab Methodology Handbook", European Network of Living Labs.
  33. Mastelic, J.(2019), "Stakeholder's engagement in the co-design of energy conservation interventions: The case of the Energy Living Lab", Doctoral Thesis, University of Lausanne.
  34. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A M. (1994). "Qualitative Data Analysis", An Expanded Sourcebook, Publications, Thousand Oaks.
  35. Renn, O., et al. (2020), "The role of public participation in energy transitions", Cambridge, Academic Press.
  36. Rolf W. et al.(2007), "Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept", EnergyPolicy, Vol.35, No.6, pp. 2683 - 2691.
  37. Schumacher, J. (2013), "Living Labs Definition, Harmonization Cube Indicators & Good Practices", Alcotra Innovation Project, Deliverable 3.1.
  38. Schuurman, D. (2015), "Living Labs: A Systematic Literature Review". Istanbul: Open living Labs Days, 2015.
  39. Seppo Leminen(2015), "Q&A. What Are Living Labs?", Technology Innovation Management Review,Vol.5, No.9, pp.29 - 35. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview928
  40. Silvana Di Bono. et al(2018), "Solar Living Lab: implementing sustainable experimentation process, responsible innovation and community engagement in a solar energy", Research and Innovation Conference Proceedings, ENoLL Open Living Lab Days 2018.
  41. Sorensen E., Torfing J.(2007), "Theories of Democratic Network Governance". Palgrave Macmillan, Basing stoke.
  42. Stahlbrost,A., Bergvall-Kareborn,B.(2008), "Constructing representations of users needs - a Living Lab approach", Proceedings of 31th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia.
  43. Stake, R. E. (2005), "Qualitative case studies", In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research, pp. 443 - 466.
  44. Tira, M, Giannouli, I. et al.(2017), "INTENSSS PA: a systematic approach for INspiring Training ENergy-Spatial Socioeconomic Sustainability to Public Authorities", Upland-Journal of Urban Planning, Landscape & environmental Design, Vol. 2, No.2, pp. 65-84
  45. VINNOVA. Available at: http://www.vinnova.se
  46. Viseur, I.R. (2016), "A Sector-Selection Methodology for Living Labs" Implementation Proceeding of the 12th International Symposium on Open Collaboration.
  47. Vrande, V. et al.(2009), "Open Innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges", Technovation, Vol. 29, pp.423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
  48. Yin, R.K.(2003) "Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Stage", Thousand Oaks, California.