한국환경과학회지 (Journal of Environmental Science International)

  • 제30권8호
  • /
  • Pages.629-646
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-4517(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3503(eISSN)
한국환경과학회 (The Korean Environmental Sciences Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

자연환경 가치의 효율적 이용과 보전을 위한 환경정책통합 기반연구

A Study on Environmental Policy Integration for the Efficient Use and Conservation of Natural Environmental Values

  • 윤호정 (국립한경대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 염성진 (국립한경대학교 조경학과)
  • Yoon, Ho-Jung (Department of Landscape Architecture, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Yeom, Sung-Jin (Department of Landscape Architecture, Hankyong National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.06.09
  • 심사 : 2021.07.08
  • 발행 : 2021.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Damage to the natural environment is becoming increasingly complex in modern society, expanding to impact not only the environment but also society and the economy. Various systems and policies based on sustainability have been promoted internationally. Legal systems and policies based on evaluation systems such as land environment assessment and urban ecological status maps, have been implemented in Korea. However, most of Korea institutions and policies related to the natural environment have been directed toward the conservation of the natural environment, and restricted to in simple theoretical frameworks with various limitations. Therefore, this study analyzed the definition and value of the natural environment for a fundamental conceptual approach to the valuation of the natural environment. Based on this, we modeled the policy process for a flexible evaluation system suitable for the actual situation of Korea natural environment through a review of the integration of environmental policy proposed in Europe.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, E. Y., Kim, S. G., 2013, Losses of indirect use and non-use values of groundwater or environmental challenges in terms of the inaction costs of OECD, Econ. Environ. Geol., 46, 85-91. https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2013.46.1.85
  2. Bache, I., Flinders, M., 2004, Multi-level Governance, Oxford University Press, USA, 1-11.
  3. Biebaum, R., Cowie, A., 2018, Integration: to solve complex environmental problems, Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel(STAP), USA.
  4. Brown, L., M Tomerini, D., 2009, Environmental mainstreaming in developing countries, Urban Research Program, Griffith School of Environment Griffith University Nathan 4111 Brisbane, Australia.
  5. Burck, J., Hagen, U., Bals, C., Hohne, N., Nascimento, L., 2021, Climate change performance index 2021: background and methodology, Germanwatch, Europe.
  6. Chan, K. M. A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Diaz, S., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., W. Luck, G., Martin-Lopez, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pasucal, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., Turner, N., Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 1462-1465.
  7. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., V. O'neill, R., Paruelo, J., G. Raskin, R., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M., 1997, The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  8. Cressell, I., Murphy, H., 2016, Importance of biodiversity, Commonwealth of Australia.
  9. De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., Boumans, R. M., 2002, A Typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, Ecol. Econ., 41, 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
  10. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), 2007, An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services, Crown, London.
  11. European Commission, 2003, Integration of environment into transport policy - from strategies to good practice, Europe.
  12. European Commission, 2007, Environmental integration handbook for EC development co-operation, Europe.
  13. European Environment Agency, 2015, Natural capital and ecosystem services, Europe.
  14. European Environment Agency, 2020, Natural capital and ecosystem services, Europe.
  15. Freeman, A. M. III., A. Herriges, J., L. Kling, C., 2014, The measurement of environmental and resource values, 3rd ed., Taylor & Francis, Routledge, New York.
  16. Freeman, A. M. III., Robert, H. H., Allen, V. K., 1973, The economics of environmental policy, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 55, 687.
  17. Hargrove, C., 1992, Week anthropocentric intrinsic value, The Monist, 75, 183-207. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19927529
  18. Hong, S. P., 2016, Implication measures between strategic environmental impact assessment and sustainable development indicators, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 25(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2016.25.1.63
  19. hUiginn, O., Flynn, B., 2016, Environmental policy integration: innovation and change, Report 290, epa Research, National University of Ireland, Europe.
  20. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2014, Climate change 2014 sysnthesis report summary for policymakers, Geneva.
  21. Janicke, M., Jorgens, H., 2000, Strategic environmental planning and uncertainty: a cross national comparison of green plans in industrialized countries, Policy Stud J, 28(3), 612-632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2000.tb02051.x
  22. Kang, S. W., Lee, C. H., 2014, Mid- to long-term environmental outlook and response strategies, Korea Environment Institute, Korea.
  23. Kim, G. H., Choi, H. S., Kim, D. B., Jung, Y. R., Jin, D. Y., 2020, Urban sprawl prediction in 2030 using decision tree, Journal of Korean Environment Restoration Technology, 23, 125-135.
  24. Kim, H. S., 2007, A Study on the management plan of sustainable development indicators and environmental evaluation, Korea Environment Institute, Korea.
  25. Kim, Y. S., 2014, Introduction of integrated environmental management system and policy in advanced countries, Korea.
  26. Kneese, A. V., Ayres, R. U., D'Arge, R. C., 1970, Economics and the environment: A materials balance approach, 1st ed., REF Press, New York.
  27. Korea Environment Institute, 2017, A Comprehensive study of environmental values for integrated analysis of environmental and economic conditions, Korea.
  28. Korea Environment Institute, 2017, Challenges for introducing different approaches to environmental valuation, 21(4), Korea.
  29. Korea Environment Institute, 2017, Understanding and policy directions for total natural resources management. Report 28, Korea.
  30. Kumar, P., 2010, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. Earthscan, London.
  31. Kwak, S. Y., Shin, J. W., 2015, Environmental value mid- to long-term research demand survey, Korea Environment Institute, Korea.
  32. Lafferty, W. M., Hovden, E., 2003, Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework, Env. Polit., 12, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010412331308254
  33. Lee, B. W., Hwang, K. J., Kim, N. K., 2005, Environmental management, 1st ed., You, E. J., Lee, K. Y., Kim, Y. O., Ecolivre, Korea.
  34. Lee, D. K., Jeon, S. W., 1997, A Conceptual study of sustainable city indicators: with priority given to environmental indicators, J EIA, 6, 33-45.
  35. Lee, G. G., Yang, B. E., 2001, A Determinant model for methods to calculate the weighted value of each indicator for environmental evaluation, J EIA, 10, 59-71.
  36. Lee, G. S., 2020, Analysis and implications of KOICA environmental mainstreaming implementation: focusing on organizations and systems, Journal of International Development Cooperation, 15, 49-83. https://doi.org/10.34225/jidc.2020.15.1.49
  37. Lee, S. J., Ryu. J. E., Jeon, S. W., 2020, An Analysis of environmental policy effect on green space change using logistic regression model, Journal of Korean Environment Restoration Technology, 23, 13-30.
  38. Liu, J., Monney, A. H., Hull, V., Li, S., Gaskell, J., Hertel, T., Lubchenco, J., C Seto, J., H. Gleick, P., Kremen, C., 2015, Systems integration for global sustainability, Science, 347(6225).
  39. Mickwitz, P., Aix, F., Beck, S., Carss, D., Ferrand, N., Gorg, C., Jensen, A., Kivimaa, P., Kuhlicke, C., Kuindersma, W., Manez, M., Melanen, M., Monni, S., Pedersen B. A., Reinert, H., van Bommel, S., 2009, Climate policy integration, coherence and governance, Partnership for European environmental research(PEER), Helsinki, Europe.
  40. Mullally, G. M., Dunphy, N., 2015, State of play review of environmental policy integration literature, National Economic & Social Council, Europe.
  41. Reid, W. V., Mooney, H. A., Cropper, A., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S. R., Chopra, K., Dasgupta, P., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Hassan, R., Kasperson, R., Leemans, R., May, R. M., McMichael, A. J., Pingali, P., Samper, C., Scholes, R., Watson, R. T., Zakri, A. H., Shidong, Z., Ash, N. J., Bennett, E., Kumar, P., Lee, M. J., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Simons, H., Thonell, J., Zurek, M. B., 2005, Ecosystem and human well-being: synthesis, Island Press, Washington, DC.
  42. Nilsson, M., Zamparutti, T., Petersen, J. E., Nykvist, B., Rudberg, P., McGuinn, J., 2012, Understanding policy coherence: analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU, Environ. Policy Gov., 22, 395-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1589
  43. Otoiu, A., Gradinaru, G., 2018, Proposing a composite environmental index to account for the actual state and changes in environmental dimensions, as a critique to EPI, Ecological Indicators, 93, 1209-1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.009
  44. Pearce, D. W., Pretty, J. N., 1993, Economic values and the natural world, Earthscan. Publications, London.
  45. Scholte, S. S. K., van Teefelen, A. J. A., Verburg, P. H., 2015, Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: a review of concepts and methods, Ecol. Econ., 114, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007
  46. Seong, H, E., 2009, Eco-innovation policies and policy integration the finnish case, Korea Environmental Policy And Administration Society, 8, 119~144.
  47. Seymour, F., Maurer, C., Quiroga, R., 2005, Environmental mainstreaming: applications in the context of modernization of the state, social development, competitiveness, and regional integration, Inter American Development Bank (IADB), USA.
  48. Shah, A., 2014, Why is biodiversity important? Who cares?, Global Issues.
  49. Tadaki, M., Sinner, J., Chan, M. A. K., 2017, Making sense of environmental values: a typology of concepts: a typology of concepts, Ecol. Soc., 22, 7.
  50. The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity (TEEB), 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations, Earthscan, London.
  51. The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity (TEEB), 2012, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in local and regional policy and management, 1st ed., Wittmemr, H., Gundimeda, H., Routledge, London.
  52. Turner, R. K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., Georgiou, S., 2003, Valuing natur: learned and future research directions, Ecological Economics, 46, 493-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00189-7
  53. University of Latvia, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Baltic Environmental Forum, 2018, The guidebook on the introduction to the ecosystem service framework and its application in integrated planning, Europe.
  54. Walz, A., Schmidt, K., Ruiz-Frau, A., A. Nicholas, K., Bierry, A., de Vries Lentsch, A., Dyankov, A., Joyce, D., H. Liski, A., Marba, N., T. Rosario, I., S. K. Scholte, S., 2019, Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services for operational ecosystem management: mapping applications by decision contexts in Europe, Regional Environmental Change, 19, 2245-2259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01506-7
  55. Wendling, Z. W., Emerson, J. W., de Sherbinin, A., Esty, D. C., Environmental performance index 2020, Yale center for Environmental Law & Policy, USA.
  56. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), 2016, Living planet report, Switzerland.
  57. You, J. H., Park, K. H., Jung, S. G., 2005, A Study on importance of assessment factors and indicators of natural ecosystem for environmentally friendly land conservation, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 14(4), 165-177.
  58. 2013, The Freshwater Blog, https://freshwaterblog.net/2013/06/20/what-is-the-ecosystem-services-approach/.
  59. 2020, San Jose State University, https://www.sjsu.edu/sustainability/academics/.
  60. 2020, Technology Arts Sciences TH Koln, https://ssi.wi.th-koeln.de/.
  61. 2021, E-learning module, https://www.marine-ecosystem-services.eu/en/Section-3/3-1-building-a-common-language-definitions-and-nomenclatures/3-1-7-concept-of-values.
  62. 2021, Global Footprint Network, https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ecological-footprint/.
  63. 2021, Sustainable Development Repot, https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/.