The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education (한국간호교육학회지)

The Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education (한국간호교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The influence of critical thinking disposition, deep approaches to learning and learner-to-learner interaction on nursing process confidence in nursing students, with a focus on team-based learning

간호대학생의 비판적 사고성향, 심층적 학습접근방식, 학습자간 상호작용이 간호과정 자신감에 미치는 영향: 팀 기반 학습을 중심으로

  • Received : 2021.03.15
  • Accepted : 2021.07.12
  • Published : 2021.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study uses a descriptive research design to identify the influence of critical thinking disposition, deep approaches to learning, and interaction between learners on the degree of nursing process confidence for nursing students. Methods: The subjects of the study were second-year students in the Department of Nursing at a university in G city. The data included general characteristics, critical thinking disposition, deep approaches to learning, learner-to-learner interaction, and nursing process confidence were analyzed utilizing an independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Scheffe's test to identify differences in the variables according to general characteristics. To identify the correlation between the factors related to the nursing process and nursing process confidence, Pearson's correlation was analyzed, and hierarchical regression was used to determine the factors affecting the confidence of the subject's nursing process. Results: Gender, critical thinking disposition, and in-depth learning approach were statistically significant as factors affecting the nursing process confidence of nursing students, and these factors were shown to explain 62% of nursing course performance (F=23.80, p<.001), among which in-depth learning access has the greatest influence (β=.41, p<.001). Conclusion: Critical thinking disposition and deep approaches to learning arbitration program development are necessary to improve nursing students' nursing process confidence.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Nambu University, 2019.

References

  1. Yang SH, Sim IO. Relationship between problem solving ability, critical thinking disposition, creativity, self-efficacy and nursing process competence of nursing students. Journal of The Korea Contents Association. 2016;16(5):612-622. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.05.612
  2. Jang HJ, Kwag YK. Affecting factors on clinical competence of nursing students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2013;14(9):4380-4387. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.9.4380
  3. Raymond-Seniuk C, Christy, Profetto-McGrath J. Can one learn to think critically? A philosophical exploration. The Open Nursing Journal. 2011;5:45-51. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601105010045
  4. Kim SO. Effects of team-based learning on learning attitude, learning motivation, problem solving ability, participation in lessons of nursing students. Journal of Digital Convergence. 2017;15(4):351-362. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.4.351
  5. Lee SJ, Park YM, Noh SM. The effects of simulation training with hybrid model for nursing students on nursing performance ability and self confidence. Korean Society of Adult Nursing. 2013;25(1):170-182. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.2.170
  6. Kim NY. Effects of online blended learning-based nursing diagnosis course in undergraduate nursing education. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society. 2016;18(5):2843-2855.
  7. Lee HJ. Effects of problem based learning using mind map on nursing process of nursing students. Korean Academy on Communication in Healthcare. 2017;12(1):119-126. https://doi.org/10.15715/kjhcom.2017.12.1.119
  8. Jeong YW, Min HY. Effects of team-based learning using concept mapping on critical thinking disposition and metacognition of nursing students. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2019;25(3):277-288. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2019.25.3.277
  9. Branney J, Priego-Hernandez J. A mixed methods evaluation of team-based learning for applied pathophysiology in undergraduate nursing education. Nurse Education Today. 2018;61:127-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.014
  10. Gerry S. A model of collaborative knowledge-building. In: Fishman B, O'Connor-Divelbiss S, editors. Fourth international conference of the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2000. p. 70-77.
  11. Stamatel JP, Bushway SD, Roberson WD. Shaking up criminal justice education with team-based learning. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 2013;24(3):417-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2013.782054
  12. Laird TFN, Seifert TA, Pascarella ET, Mayhew MJ, Blaich CF. Deeply affecting first-year students' thinking: Deep approaches to learning and three dimensions of cognitive development. The Journal of Higher Education. 2014;85(3):402-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777333
  13. Baeten M, Kyndt E, Struyven K, Dochy F. Using student-centered learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review. 2010;5(3):243-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001
  14. Joo YJ, Ko KY. The effects of achievement motivation, quality of teaching and learning, students' approaches to learning and peer interaction on outcomes of collaborative learning. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2016;16(3):85-103.
  15. Park CS, Ko YJ. Relationship between self-directed learning ability, critical thinking disposition and nursing process confidence of nursing students. The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2019;20(10):68-75. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.10.68
  16. Kwon IS, Lee GE, Kim GD, Kim YH, Park KM, Park HS, et al. Development of a critical thinking disposition scale for nursing students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2006;36(6):950-958. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2006.36.6.950
  17. Kember D, Biggs J, Leung DY. Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the learning process questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2004;74(2):261-279. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904773839879
  18. Sherry AC, Fulford CP, Zhang S. Assessing distance learners' satisfaction with instruction: A quantitative and a qualitative measure. American Journal of Distance Education. 1998;12(3):4-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649809527002
  19. Kwon HS. Development and effects of nursing process simulation scenario [dissertation]. Daegu: Kyungpook National University; 2014. p. 20-21.
  20. Herrmann KJ, Bager-Elsborg, McCune V. Investigating the relationships between approaches to learning, learner identities and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education. 2016;74:285-400.
  21. Laird TFN, Seifert TA, Pascarella ET, Mayhew MJ, Blaich CF. Deeply affecting first-year students' thinking: deep approaches to learning and three dimensions of cognitive development. The Journal of Higher Education. 2014;85(3):402-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777333
  22. Kim HS. Effects of the nursing process education program on critical thinking dispositions of the nursing students. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society. 2015;17(1):565-574.
  23. Kim SO. The relationship among self-efficacy, career decision making types and career decision level of nursing students. Journal of Korean Academy Society Nursing Education. 2016;22(2):210-219. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2016.22.2.210
  24. Rouhshad A, Storch N. A focus on mode in peer interaction. In: Sato M, Ballinger S, editors. Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2016. p. 267-290.
  25. Philp J. Epilogue. New pathways in researching interaction. In: Sato M, Ballinger S, editors. Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2016. p. 377-396.