DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Orbital floor fracture repair with implants: a retrospective study

  • Lee, Yong Jig (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2020.11.10
  • Accepted : 2021.06.20
  • Published : 2021.08.20

Abstract

Background: Although prompt surgery after an orbital fracture is preferable, the actual timing of surgery in real-world settings varies. Therefore, this study investigated the outcomes of implant surgery for inferior orbital wall fractures by comparing three groups according to the time interval between the injury and surgery. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients' medical charts and initial computed tomography images from 2009 to 2020. The time to treatment was chosen by patients or their guardians based on the patients' comorbidities and the physician's explanation. The patients were divided into three groups according to the time of surgery (group 1: 3-7 days, group 2: 8-14 days, group 3: 15 or more days). Data were collected on age, the time interval until surgery, the dimensions of the defect, the operation time, the follow-up period, and the postoperative paresthesia score (ranging from 0 to 10). The outcomes were evaluated using a 4-point scale: 4=good (no complications), 3=fair (no subjective symptoms), 2=poor (remaining paresthesia), and 1=very poor (strabismus and/or enophthalmos). Results: The study included 85 patients with unilateral fractures who underwent surgery from 3 to 93 days after injury. The overall score distribution of the surgical outcomes was as follows: good=63, fair=7, poor=6, and very poor=9. The three groups showed no significant differences in the transverse dimension of the injury (p=0.110) or the anteroposterior dimension (p=0.144). In groups 1, 2, and 3, the postoperative outcome scores were 3.84±0.37, 3.63±0.87, and 2.93±1.33 (p=0.083), and the percentage of patients with good outcomes was 84%, 81.25%, and 57.14%, respectively. Conclusion: Performing surgery using an artificial implant within 2 weeks of the injury showed better outcomes and fewer postoperative complications than when treatment was delayed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a grant of the Research Institute of Medical Science, Daegu Catholic University (grant No. 2019-08, 2019).

References

  1. Aldekhayel S, Aljaaly H, Fouda-Neel O, Shararah AW, Zaid WS, Gilardino M. Evolving trends in the management of orbital floor fractures. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25:258-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000441
  2. Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;4:CD001431.
  3. Kim HS, Jeong EC. Orbital floor fracture. Arch Craniofac Surg 2016;17:111-8. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2016.17.3.111
  4. Lee DW, Kim TH, Choi HJ, Wee SY. Delayed-type retrobulbar hematoma caused by low temperature after reconstruction of inferior blow-out fracture. Arch Craniofac Surg 2021;22:110-4. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00052
  5. Aldhabaan SA, Hudise JY, Obeid AA. A meta-analysis of preand postoperative corticosteroids for reducing the complications following facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2020 Jun 20 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.05.015.
  6. Bennett M. The LANSS Pain Scale: the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs. Pain 2001;92:147-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00482-6
  7. Mansour TN, Rudolph M, Brown D, Mansour N, Taheri MR. Orbital blowout fractures: a novel CT measurement that can predict the likelihood of surgical management. Am J Emerg Med 2017;35:112-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.030
  8. Rever LJ, Manson PN, Randolph MA, Yaremchuk MJ, Weiland A, Siegel JH. The healing of facial bone fractures by the process of secondary union. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:451-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199103000-00009
  9. Silbert DI, Matta NS, Singman EL. Diplopia secondary to orbital surgery. Am Orthopt J 2012;62:22-8. https://doi.org/10.3368/aoj.62.1.22
  10. Brucoli M, Arcuri F, Cavenaghi R, Benech A. Analysis of complications after surgical repair of orbital fractures. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:1387-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821cc317
  11. Ramphul A, Hoffman G. Does preoperative diplopia determine the incidence of postoperative diplopia after repair of orbital floor fracture? An institutional review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:565-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.10.036
  12. Tahiri Y, Lee J, Tahiri M, Sinno H, Williams BH, Lessard L, et al. Preoperative diplopia: the most important prognostic factor for diplopia after surgical repair of pure orbital blowout fracture. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:1038-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e47c45
  13. Alinasab B, Borstedt KJ, Rudstrom R, Ryott M, Qureshi AR, Beckman MO, et al. New algorithm for the management of orbital blowout fracture based on prospective study. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2018;11:285-95. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641714
  14. Waterhouse N, Lyne J, Urdang M, Garey L. An investigation into the mechanism of orbital blowout fractures. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:607-12. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1999.3194
  15. Koornneef L. Orbital septa: anatomy and function. Ophthalmology 1979;86:876-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(79)35444-6
  16. Jung JS, Kang DH, Lim NK, Kim H. Orbital wall restoration with primary bone fragments in complex orbital fractures: a preliminary study. Arch Craniofac Surg 2020;21:156-60. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00101
  17. Kim T, Kim BK. Endoscopic slide-in orbital wall reconstruction for isolated medial blowout fractures. Arch Craniofac Surg 2020;21:345-50. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00605

Cited by

  1. Potential role of artificial intelligence in craniofacial surgery vol.22, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00507