디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권8호
  • /
  • Pages.185-193
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

IT 기업 관리자의 진성 리더십이 구성원의 직무 열의에 미치는 영향: 구성원 자기주도학습 능력의 매개효과

The Mediating Effects of Subordinates' Self-Directed Learning Ability on the Relationship between IT Company Manager's Authentic Leadership and Subordinates' Work Engagement

  • 투고 : 2021.07.30
  • 심사 : 2021.08.20
  • 발행 : 2021.08.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

4차 산업혁명 환경 속에서 기업 경쟁력을 높이기 위해서는 디지털 역량을 갖춘 인재를 확보하고, 육성하는 것이 무엇보다 중요하다. 특히 IT 분야에서 요구되는 지식 및 스킬은 새롭게 생성되거나 추가되기 때문에 IT 기업 구성원의 업스킬링(upskilling)과 리스킬링(resklling)을 통한 전문성 향상은 필수적이다. 이에 본 연구는 IT 기업 종사자를 대상으로 관리자의 진성 리더십과 구성원의 직무 열의 관계에서 구성원의 자기주도학습 능력의 매개효과를 분석함으로써 인적자원개발 측면에서 IT 기업의 경쟁력 강화를 이론적 논의와 실천적 시사점을 제언하였다. 연구 결과, 첫째, IT 기업 관리자의 진성 리더십은 구성원의 직무 열의에 정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 구성원의 자기주도학습 능력은 IT 기업 관리자의 진성 리더십과 구성원의 직무 열의 관계에서 부분매개 하는 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 본 연구는 IT 기업 관리자의 진성 리더십이 구성원의 자기주도학습 능력을 촉진시키며, 나아가 직무 열의도 증진시킬 수 있다는 것을 실증하였다.

In order to increase corporate competitiveness in the fourth industrial revolution environment, it is most important to secure and nurture talented people with digital capabilities. In particular, because the knowledge and skills required in the IT sector are newly created or added, enhancing expertise through upskilling and reskilling of IT company members is essential. Thus, this study proposed theoretical discussions and practical implications for strengthening the competitiveness of IT company in terms of human resource development by analyzing the mediating effects of subordinates' self-directed learning ability in the relationship between managers' authentic leadership and subordinates' work engagement. The results of this study were as follows: First, authentic leadership of IT company manager had positive effect on subordinates' work engagement. Second, self-directed learning ability of subordinates' had partial mediating effect on the relationship between IT company manager's authentic leadership and subordinates' work engagement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. P. C. Verhoef, T. Broekhuizen, Y., Bart, A. Bhattacharya, J. Q., Dong, N. Fabian & M. Haenlein. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
  2. J. Kew & J. Stredwick. (2017). Business environment: managing in a strategic context. Kogan Page Publishers.
  3. Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business. New York.
  4. D. M. Jung. (2017). Comprehensive Apporach to Job Tunover of IT Workforce : Integration with the validity of organizational effectiveness and technostress control model. Unpublished Doctoral thesis. Keimyung University, Jeonnam, Daegu
  5. Y. D. Kim, S. K. Jeong. & J. C. Ahn. (2021). An Analysis for the Skill Mismatching of IT Service Sector by Technology Changes. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 22(2), 273-282. DOI : 10.5762/KAIS.2021.22.2.273
  6. H. W. Lee, E. K. Bae & M. Y. Lee. (2019). Development of Developmental Leadership Inventory for Corporate Managers: Focused on A Company in IT Industry. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(2), 1-29. DOI : 10.18211/kjhrdq.2019.21.2.001
  7. S. J. Yang. (2017). The influence of team leaders' coaching leardership on organizational effectiveness : the mediation effect of self-directed learning and innovative behaviors. Unpublished Doctoral thesis. Hanyang University. Seoul.
  8. M. S. Hagen. (2012). Managerial coaching: A review of the literature. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 24(4), 17-39. DOI : 10.1002/piq.20123
  9. H. A. Oh & J. S. Jung. (2018). An Effect of Authentic Leadership and Transformational Leadership on Job crafting: with Mediating Effect of Positive Psychological Capital and Organizational Identification. The Korean Leadership Review, 8(4), 21-60. DOI : 10.22243/tklq.2017.8.4.21
  10. S. W. Yim, A. K. Choi & J. H. Jeon. (2017). The Effect of Managers' Motivational Language on Employees' Job Crafting : The Mediating Effect of Self-efficacy. Journal of Corporate Education and Talent Research, 19(3), 157-184. DOI : 10.46260/KSLP.19.3.6
  11. H. J. Wang, E. Demerouti & P. Le Blanc. (2017). Transformational leadership, adaptability, and job crafting: The moderating role of organizational identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 185-195. DOI : 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.03.009
  12. J. G. Yoon. (2015). Authentic Leadership. Raonbooks. Seoul.
  13. F. Luthans & B. J. Avolio. (2003), Authentic leadership development. In Cameron, K. S., J. E. Dutton & R. E. Quinn(Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 241-258.
  14. D. Y. Kim, E. K. Bae & M. J. Han. (2013). Mediating Effects of Teacher's Self-Directed Learning Ability on the Relationship between Principal's Authentic Leadership and Teacher's Organizational Commitment in Early Childhood Educational Institutes. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 26(10), 2561-2582.
  15. H. C. Son, K. K. Lim & J. S. Eon. (2016). The Effect of Authentic Leadership on Self-efficacy: Focused on the Mediating Role of Self-regulated Learning, Journal of Creativity and Innovation, 9(3), 129-169. DOI : 10.22834/PDS.2016.9.3.129
  16. H. J. Gwon. (2019). The Effect of Authentic Leadership on Learning Organization, Positive Psychological Capital and Self-Directed Learning, Tourism Research, 44(2), 27-51. DOI : 10.32780/ktidoi.2019.44.2.27
  17. B. K. Joo, S. H. Park & S. H. Lee. (2020). Personal growth initiative: the effects of person-organization fit, work empowerment and authentic leadership. International Journal of Manpower. DOI: 10.1108/IJM-02-2020-0056
  18. C. K. Kim & E. K. Bae. (2015). Moderating Effects of Self-Directed Learning Ability on the Relationship between HRD Consultants' Job Crafting and Work Engagement. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 34(4), 51-71.
  19. C. Park, J. G. Lee & J. K. Lee. (2015). The Structural relationship among self-directed learning, psychological capital, and work engagement of employees: Focused on the conglomerates in Korea. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17(4), 133-158. DOI : 10.18211/kjhrdq.2015.17.4.006
  20. R. A. Noe, A. D. Clarke & H. J. Klein. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091302
  21. S. Sengupta, S. Sharma & A. Singh. (2021). Authentic leadership fostering creativity in start-ups: Mediating role of work engagement and employee task proactivity. Business Perspectives and Research, 9(2), 235-251. DOI : 10.1177/2278533720964298
  22. E. M. Jang & C. Xing. (2020). The Effects of Authentic Leadership on Work Engagement: Moderated Effects of Employee's Calling. Journal of Creativity and Innovation, 13(3), 37-69.
  23. M. Y. Jang & S. S. Lee. (2020). Structural Relationship between Authentic Leadership, Job Engagement, Job Burnout, and Turnover Intention among Workers in the Service Industry: Multi-Group Analysis by Emotional Labor Intensity. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 39(6), 39-62. DOI : 10.37210/JVER.2020.39.6.39
  24. M. Bamford, C. A. Wong & H. Laschinger. (2013). The influence of authentic leadership and areas of worklife on work engagement of registered nurses. Journal of nursing management, 21(3), 529-540. DOI : /10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01399.x
  25. H. Wirawan, M. Jufri & A. Saman. (2020). The effect of authentic leadership and psychological capital on work engagement: the mediating role of job satisfaction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(8), 1139-1154. DOI : 10.1108/LODJ-10-2019-0433
  26. T. Gigol. (2020). Influence of authentic leadership on unethical pro-organizational behavior: the intermediate role of work engagement. Sustainability, 12(3), 1182. DOI : 10.3390/su12031182
  27. W. B. Schaufeli, A. B. Bakker & M. Salanova. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4), 701-716. DOI : 10.1177/0013164405282471
  28. I. S. Kwon & Y. K. Choi. (2011). A Study on the Antecedents of Job Engagement and Psychological Conditions as the Mediators. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 18(4), 113-134.
  29. W. S. Kang, J. Y. Kim & W. C. Kim. (2021). Meta-analysis of the Relationship Between Leadership and Work Engagement: Focusing on the Domestic Research in South Korea Over the Recent 10 Years. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23(1), 57-85. DOI : 0.18211/kjhrdq.2021.23.1.003 https://doi.org/10.18211/KJHRDQ.2021.23.1.003
  30. H. Murlis & P. Schubert. (2002). Engage employees and boost performance. LA: Hay Group Working Paper.
  31. W. B. Schaufeli & A. B. Bakker. (2004). Job demand, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-316. DOI : /10.1002/job.248
  32. B. L. Rich, J. A. Lepine & E. R. Crawford. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635. DOI : 10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
  33. F. O. Walumbwa, B. J. Avolio, W. L. Gardner, T. S. Wernsing & S. J. Peterson. (2008). Authentic leadership development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. DOI : 10.1177/0149206307308913
  34. E. K. Bae & M. Y. Lee. (2010). The Development of the Self-Directed Learning Ability Inventory for Employees in HRD Companies. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(3), 1-26. DOI : 10.18211/kjhrdq.2010.12.3.001
  35. J. P. Yu. (2015). The Item Parceling Bias of Multi-Dimensionality in the Structural Equation Modeling. korean management review, 44(4), 1131-1147. https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2015.44.4.1131
  36. K. S. Kim. (2007). New AMOS 16.0 Structural Equaition Model analysis. Seoul: Hannarae.
  37. J. C. Anderson & D. W. Gerbing. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.411
  38. H. H. Harman (1976). Modern factor analysis. NJ: University of Chicago press.
  39. K. F. Widaman. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multi trait-multi method data. Applied Psychological Measurement. 9(1), 1-26. DOI : 10.1177/014662168500900101
  40. P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. Mackenzie, J. Lee & N. P. Podsakoff. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(5). 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879