Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the integrative feedback modeling to develop pre-service teachers' competence of planning STEAM lessons

예비교사의 융합적 수업구성 역량 향상을 위한 통합적 피드백의 모델링

  • Received : 2021.06.28
  • Accepted : 2021.08.20
  • Published : 2021.08.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Along with the advent of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, fostering young talents with convergent mind is getting important. Moreover pre-service teachers' ability to design proper convergent classes can be a meaningful issue for high quality future education. This study proposes the role of professors' exquisite feedback is so significant for developing their competence in STEAM education, It analyzed how various theories regarding feedback support them to enhance convergent knowledge with e-learning. They participated in the 5 step group and individual activities for creating STEAM lesson plan and received suitable feedback. Lastly a survey was performed. The researchers did modeling how integrative feedback was applied to the procedure step by step according to the 'Ladder of Inference' theory. This strategic model contributed to elevating the participants' convergent knowledge, competence, achievement and satisfaction.

4차산업혁명 시대의 도래와 더불어 융합형 인재양성의 중요성이 부각 되고 있고 이러한 교육을 담당할 예비교사들의 융합수업(STEAM) 구성 능력의 함양이 양질의 미래 교육을 담보할 이슈로 떠오르고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 진정한 융합교육이 이루어지기 위해서는 교수자의 면밀한 피드백의 역할과 기능이 예비교사들의 역량 강화에 주요한 요소임을 제시하며, 교육학에 있어서 피드백에 관한 제반 이론이 이러닝을 활용한 대학 수업에서 예비교사들의 융합적 지식형성을 어떻게 지원하는지를 분석하였다. 예비교사들은 STEAM 수업지도안을 작성하는 과정에서 4단계의 조별 활동과 그에 걸맞은 피드백을 제공 받았으며 5단계에서는 이를 바탕으로 개별 수업지도안을 완성하였다. 수업지도안의 완성 후에는 설문조사를 실시하여 예비교사들의 인식을 조사하였다. 단계별로 적용된 통합적 피드백의 세부적 내용과 융합적 수업구성 역량의 향상 과정을 사다리이론을 근거로 하여 모델링 하였다. 이러한 전략적 모형은 예비교사들의 융합적 지식과 역량을 제고할 뿐 아니라 그들의 성취도와 만족도 향상에도 기여하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education. (2020, May 26). Comprehensive Plan for the Convergent Education(Science, Mathematics, Information)('20~'24). Press Release. [Website]. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=80718&lev=0&searchType=S&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
  2. KICE (2018). Credit Recognition Plan for 'Out-of-School Learning Experience' for Introduction of High School Credit System, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, Issue paper, ORM 2018-39-11, ISN 979-11-5788=733-093370.
  3. Y. M. Lee. (1987). A Study on the effect of providing feedback in the teaching-learning process, Master's Thesis, Ewha Woman's University.
  4. Y. Y, Hong. & Y. W. Im. (2019). A study on the educational methodology for improving pre-service teachers' competence of designing, The Society of Digital Policy & Management, 17(8), 71-80.
  5. M. Sanders. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania, The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
  6. Y. Y. Hong. (2014). Pre-service teachers' practical use of graphing calculators for STEAM education, The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 20(3), 355-372.
  7. J. W. Choi. & Y. J. Lee. (2016). How to Improve Teacher Training for STEAM Education, Convergence Education Review, 2(1).
  8. R. M. Gagne. (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rrinehart and Winston.
  9. R. C. Anderson., R. W. Kulhavy. & T. Andre.(1971). Feedback procedures in programmed instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030766
  10. P. G. Cole.. & L. K. Chan. (1987). Teaching principle and practice. NY : Prentice Hall.
  11. S. Blomeke. & S. Delaney. (2012). Assessment of teacher knowledge across countries: A review of the state of research. ZDM, 44(3), 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0429-7
  12. D. L. Ball. & F. M. Forzani. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479
  13. D. Boyd., P. Grossman, H. Lankford, S. Loeb, J. Wyckoff, & I. Urban, (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416-440. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709353129
  14. J. Hiebert, E. Miller & D. Berk (2017). Relationships between mathematics teacher preparation and graduates' analyses of classroom teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 117(4), 687-707. https://doi.org/10.1086/691685
  15. M. Ronfeldt, & M. Reininger (2012). More or better student teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1091-1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.06.003
  16. R. L. Bangert-Drowns & Kullik, Chen-LinC, et al. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like event. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002213
  17. D. N. Perkins. (2003). King arthur's round table: How collaborative conversations create smart organizations. New York, N.Y.: Wiley.
  18. G. Yakman. (2008). STΣ@M Education: an overview of creating a model of integrative education, PATT. [Website]. Retrieved from http://www.steamedu.com/2088_PATT_Publication.pdf.
  19. R. Fogarty. (1991). Ten ways to integrate curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2). 61-65.