Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Important Factors for Revitalizing Profit-Type Community Facilities of Urban Renewal New Deal Project

도시재생뉴딜사업 수익형 공동이용시설 활성화 요인에 관한 연구

  • 김윤소 (부산대 대학원 건축학과) ;
  • 유재우 (부산대 건설융합학부 건축학전공)
  • Received : 2021.06.21
  • Accepted : 2021.07.27
  • Published : 2021.08.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to derive important factors for setting the direction of vitalization of profit-type community facilities created by the Urban Regeneration New Deal project. Accordingly, we analyzed vital factors for activation targeting experts and operators in the field of urban regeneration and analyzed 'satisfaction-importance', an important activation factor perceived by operators who are currently operating facilities. First, 70 factors were classified by reviewing previous studies and conducting FGI targeting experts. In order to finally derive the most appropriate important factor among the selected 70 factors, a preliminary survey was conducted with 30 experts and rearranged into 33 factors. Second, the importance and priority of vital factors were analyzed using the fixed constant sum method for 25 experts and 25 operation relation person. derive 10 detailed critical factors that we recognised to be of common importance between the two groups. As a result of the detailed results, ① sufficient review and agreement on the implementation of facilities before construction are required. ② The active participation of members must be guaranteed. ③ In order to have an organizational system in which the operating organization can stand on its own feet, expertise must be secured, and specialized educational support will be needed to support it. ④ For the sustainability of the operating organization, it is necessary to establish a long-term profit structure model and secure fixed funds. ⑤ Considering the aging of the region and the difficulty of fostering professional manpower immediately, it was found that private professional capabilities should be actively utilized. Third, important factors for activation and looked at what should be improved first using IPA. First of all, four important factors that require intensive improvement include the expertise of members, the establishment of a sustainable profit model, securing fixed funds, and the active use of private professional capabilities. As such, It is expected that the efficiency of the project will be further improved If the focus factors are improved first, therefore empirical analysis of more profit-type community facilities and additional research on vital factors for each stage of operation are necessary.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2021년도 4단계 두뇌한국21 사업(4단계 BK21 사업)에 의하여 지원되었음

References

  1. Kim, H. (2018). A Study on Public Architectural Planning & Management System from the Perspective of Local Regeneration, Chung-Ang University
  2. Yoo, B. (2020). Activation Solutions of Neighborhood Business District for Sustainable Urban Regeneration Projects: Focusing on the Community Business, Dong-Eui University.
  3. Nam, J. (2015). Research on the Formation and Management of "Local Public Space" in Train Station Areas: Focusing on 'Area Management' examples of Tokyo Metolopolitan, Seoul National University.
  4. Han, Y. (2017). Town management implementation model as urban regeneration techniques by community governance: focusing on Seoul campus town project, Kwangwoon University.
  5. Jeon, J. (2020). Research to find support plans for sustainable operation of anchor facilities : In the case of Geumha village Urban Regeneration New Deal Project, University of Seoul.
  6. Lee, U. (2018). A Proposal of Town Management Method for Local Revitalization, Chung-Ang University.
  7. Lee, H.(2018). A Study on the Increasing use of Community Center as a community hub, Kyungpook National University.
  8. Yoo, J. (2019). An Analysis of the Characteristics and the Composition Effects Perception on the Users of Urban Regeneration Anchor Tenant: Focused on Jeonju Urban Innovation Center, Mokwon University.
  9. Moon, S. (2015). Exploring neighborhood facilities as local community anchor spaces: A case study of Sungdaegol Village in Sando-dong, Seoul, Seoul National University.
  10. Kim, D. (2019). A Study on the Characteristics and the Satisfaction of Community Facilities: Focused on the Residential Environment Management Project in Seoul, University of Seoul.
  11. Kim, E. (2019). A study on the revitalization plan through an analysis of community-based facilities in residential environment management project : focus on user survey and superintendents interviews, Korea University.
  12. Kim, Y. (2020). Design and Management of Complex Anchor Facility in Urban Regeneration: Focused on the Urban Regeneration Projectin Chung-buk, Korean Association Of Cadastre Information, 22(2), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.46416/JKCIA.2020.08.22.2.111
  13. Bae, W., & Park, T. (2019). Operation Direction Of Community Facilities In Residential Environment Management Projects By The Village Community Management Association Accounting Status - Focused on 15 Villages where the Residents Public Facilities have been Completed, Urban Design Institute of Korea, 20(1), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.38195/judik.2019.02.20.1.73
  14. Lee, H., Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2014). Assessment of the Urban Design Elements in Urban Regeneration Space of Community Business Type, Urban Design Institute of Korea, 15(6), 17-31.
  15. Lee, H., Kim, Y., & Lee, S. (2018). The Analytical Research on Community Centers Used as Hub Spaces of Communities and Their Utilization Status: Focus on the Community Center in Daegu, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 34(9), 31-42.
  16. Park,, S., & Lee, S. (2015). A Study on the Development of Indicators for the Activation Plan of Sustainable Village Unit Core Facility: Focusing on the village unit core facility in Busan, Korea Planning Association, 50(4), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2015.06.50.4.87
  17. Seo, S., & Seong, E. (2018). Sustainability and the Roles of the Community-led Social Economic Organization for Urban Regeneration, space and society, 28(3), 12-47.
  18. Seo, S., Jang, M., & Kim, Y. (2019). Place-based Intergrated Plan on the Basis of Local Resources for Sustainability of Small-to-Medium Cities, Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 50-52.
  19. Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). "Importance-Performance Analysis." Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250495
  20. Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport (2021), Urban Regeneration community Facility Operation Case Book, 10-19, 66-75.