Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021R1A2C1013606), Republic of Korea. This study was also supported by Rural Development Administration (Project No. PJ015001032021), Republic of Korea.
References
- Ishino Y, Shinagawa H, Makino K, Amemura M, Nakata A. 1987. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. J. Bacteriol. 169: 5429-5433. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.169.12.5429-5433.1987
- Mojica FJ, Diez-Villasenor C, Soria E, Juez G. 2000. Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of archaea, bacteria and mitochondria. Mol. Microbiol. 36: 244-246. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01838.x
- Jansen R, Embden JD, Gaastra W, Schouls LM. 2002. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol. Microbiol. 43: 1565-1575. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02839.x
- Mojica FJ, Diez-Villasenor C, Garcia-Martinez J, Soria E. 2005. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. J. Mol. Evol. 60: 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3
- Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S, et al. 2007. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315: 1709-1712. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138140
- Horvath P, Barrangou R. 2010. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science 327: 167-170. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1179555
- Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. 2012. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337: 816-821. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829
- Adli M. 2018. The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat. Commun. 9: 1911. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04252-2
- Sapranauskas R, Gasiunas G, Fremaux C, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V. 2011. The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR/Cas system provides immunity in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 39: 9275-9282. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr606
- Ran FA, Cong L, Yan WX, Scott DA, Gootenberg JS, Kriz AJ, et al. 2015. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520: 186-191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14299
- Esvelt KM, Mali P, Braff JL, Moosburner M, Yaung SJ, Church GM. 2013. Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing. Nat. Methods 10: 1116-1121. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2681
- Hou Z, Zhang Y, Propson NE, Howden SE, Chu LF, Sontheimer EJ, et al. 2013. Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: 15644-15649. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313587110
- Hirano H, Gootenberg JS, Horii T, Abudayyeh OO, Kimura M, Hsu PD, et al. 2016. Structure and engineering of Francisella novicida Cas9. Cell 164: 950-961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.039
- Kim E, Koo T, Park SW, Kim D, Kim K, Cho HY, et al. 2017. In vivo genome editing with a small Cas9 orthologue derived from Campylobacter jejuni. Nat. Commun. 8: 14500. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14500
- Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE, et al. 2013. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339: 823-826. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232033
- Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin SL, Barretto R, Habib N, et al. 2013. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339: 819-823. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231143
- Jiang W, Zhou H, Bi H, Fromm M, Yang B, Weeks DP. 2013. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 41: e188. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt780
- Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW, Zhang F, et al. 2013. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153: 910-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025
- Cho SW, Kim S, Kim JM, Kim JS. 2013. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 31: 230-232. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2507
- Gonzalez MN, Massa GA, Andersson M, Turesson H, Olsson N, Falt AS, et al. 2019. Reduced enzymatic browning in potato tubers by specific editing of a polyphenol oxidase gene via ribonucleoprotein complexes delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Front. Plant Sci. 10: 1649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01649
- Cyranoski D. 2016. CRISPR gene-editing tested in a person for the first time. Nature 539: 479. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20988
- Reyrat JM, Pelicic V, Gicquel B, Rappuoli R. 1998. Counterselectable markers: untapped tools for bacterial genetics and pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 66: 4011-4017. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.66.9.4011-4017.1998
- Jager W, Schafer A, Puhler A, Labes G, Wohlleben W. 1992. Expression of the Bacillus subtilis sacB gene leads to sucrose sensitivity in the gram-positive bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum but not in Streptomyces lividans. J. Bacteriol. 174: 5462-5465. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.174.16.5462-5465.1992
- Schafer A, Tauch A, Jager W, Kalinowski J, Thierbach G, Puhler A. 1994. Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene 145: 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(94)90324-7
- Kolisnychenko V, Plunkett G, 3rd, Herring CD, Feher T, Posfai J, Blattner FR, et al. 2002. Engineering a reduced Escherichia coli genome. Genome Res. 12: 640-647. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.217202
- Pyne ME, Moo-Young M, Chung DA, Chou CP. 2015. Coupling the CRISPR/Cas9 system with lambda red recombineering enables simplified chromosomal gene replacement in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81: 5103-5114. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01248-15
- Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 6640-6645. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.120163297
- Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, et al. 2006. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2: 2006.0008.
- Swingle B, Markel E, Costantino N, Bubunenko MG, Cartinhour S, Court DL. 2010. Oligonucleotide recombination in Gram-negative bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 75: 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06976.x
- Fabret C, Ehrlich SD, Noirot P. 2002. A new mutation delivery system for genome-scale approaches in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 46: 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03140.x
- Fedoryshyn M, Welle E, Bechthold A, Luzhetskyy A. 2008. Functional expression of the Cre recombinase in actinomycetes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 78: 1065-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1382-9
- Lee SH, Kim HJ, Shin YA, Kim KH, Lee SJ. 2016. Single crossover-mediated markerless genome engineering in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26: 725-729. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1512.12012
- Wyman C, Kanaar R. 2006. DNA double-strand break repair: All's well that ends well. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40: 363-383. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090451
- Jin H, Lee B, Luo Y, Choi Y, Choi EH, Jin H, et al. 2020. FOXL2 directs DNA double-strand break repair pathways by differentially interacting with Ku. Nat. Commun. 11: 2010. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15748-1
- Della M, Palmbos PL, Tseng HM, Tonkin LM, Daley JM, Topper LM, et al. 2004. Mycobacterial Ku and ligase proteins constitute a two-component NHEJ repair machine. Science 306: 683-685. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1099824
- Stephanou NC, Gao F, Bongiorno P, Ehrt S, Schnappinger D, Shuman S, et al. 2007. Mycobacterial nonhomologous end joining mediates mutagenic repair of chromosomal double-strand DNA breaks. J. Bacteriol. 189: 5237-5246. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00332-07
- Zhu H, Shuman S. 2010. Gap filling activities of Pseudomonas DNA Ligase D (LigD) polymerase and functional interactions of LigD with the DNA end-binding Ku protein. J. Biol. Chem. 285: 4815-4825. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.073874
- de Vega M. 2013. The minimal Bacillus subtilis nonhomologous end joining repair machinery. PLoS One 8: e64232. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064232
- Bertrand C, Thibessard A, Bruand C, Lecointe F, Leblond P. 2019. Bacterial NHEJ: a never ending story. Mol. Microbiol. 111: 1139-1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.14218
- Selle K, Barrangou R. 2015. Harnessing CRISPR-Cas systems for bacterial genome editing. Trends Microbiol. 23: 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2015.01.008
- Cobb RE, Wang Y, Zhao H. 2015. High-efficiency multiplex genome editing of Streptomyces species using an engineered CRISPR/Cas system. ACS Synth. Biol. 4: 723-728. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb500351f
- Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA. 2013. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 31: 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2508
- Huang H, Zheng G, Jiang W, Hu H, Lu Y. 2015. One-step high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Streptomyces. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai) 47: 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmv007
- Lee N, Hwang S, Lee Y, Cho S, Palsson B, Cho BK. 2019. Synthetic biology tools for novel secondary metabolite discovery in Streptomyces. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29: 667-686. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1904.04015
- Guo T, Xin Y, Zhang Y, Gu X, Kong J. 2019. A rapid and versatile tool for genomic engineering in Lactococcus lactis. Microb. Cell Fact. 18: 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-019-1075-3
- Wirth NT, Kozaeva E, Nikel PI. 2020. Accelerated genome engineering of Pseudomonas putida by I-SceI-mediated recombination and CRISPR-Cas9 counterselection. Microb. Biotechnol. 13: 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13396
- Zhang J, Zhang D, Zhu J, Liu H, Liang S, Luo Y. 2020. Efficient multiplex genome editing in Streptomyces via engineered CRISPR-Cas12a systems. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8: 726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00726
- Feng X, Zhao D, Zhang X, Ding X, Bi C. 2018. CRISPR/Cas9 assisted multiplex genome editing technique in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. J. 13: e1700604.
- Choe D, Lee JH, Yoo M, Hwang S, Sung BH, Cho S, et al. 2019. Adaptive laboratory evolution of a genome-reduced Escherichia coli. Nat. Commun. 10: 935. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08888-6
- Darmon E, Leach DR. 2014. Bacterial genome instability. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78: 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00035-13
- Liu J, Wang Y, Lu Y, Zheng P, Sun J, Ma Y. 2017. Development of a CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing toolbox for Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb. Cell. Fact. 16: 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0815-5
- Ungerer J, Pakrasi HB. 2016. Cpf1 is a versatile tool for CRISPR genome editing across diverse species of cyanobacteria. Sci. Rep. 6: 39681. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39681
- Altenbuchner J. 2016. Editing of the Bacillus subtilis genome by the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82: 5421-5427. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01453-16
- Oh JH, van Pijkeren JP. 2014. CRISPR-Cas9-assisted recombineering in Lactobacillus reuteri. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: e131. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku623
- Yan MY, Yan HQ, Ren GX, Zhao JP, Guo XP, Sun YC. 2017. CRISPR-Cas12a-assisted recombineering in bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83: e00947-00917.
- Ao X, Yao Y, Li T, Yang TT, Dong X, Zheng ZT, et al. 2018. A multiplex genome editing method for Escherichia coli based on CRISPR-Cas12a. Front. Microbiol. 9: 2307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02307
- Reisch CR, Prather KL. 2015. The no-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) system for genome editing in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 5: 15096. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15096
- Leenay RT, Vento JM, Shah M, Martino ME, Leulier F, Beisel CL. 2019. Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 in Lactobacillus plantarum revealed that editing outcomes can vary across strains and between methods. Biotechnol. J. 14: e1700583.
- Li J, Sun J, Gao X, Wu Z, Shang G. 2019. Coupling ssDNA recombineering with CRISPR-Cas9 for Escherichia coli DnaG mutations. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 103: 3559-3570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09744-9
- Wang Y, Zhang ZT, Seo SO, Lynn P, Lu T, Jin YS, et al. 2016. Bacterial genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9: Deletion, integration, single nucleotide modification, and desirable "Clean" mutant selection in Clostridium beijerinckii as an example. ACS Synth. Biol. 5: 721-732. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.6b00060
- Wang X, He J, Le K. 2018. Making point mutations in Escherichia coli BL21 genome using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 365. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny060.
- Yao R, Liu D, Jia X, Zheng Y, Liu W, Xiao Y. 2018. CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12a biotechnology and application in bacteria. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 3: 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2018.09.004
- Jiang Y, Qian F, Yang J, Liu Y, Dong F, Xu C, et al. 2017. CRISPR-Cpf1 assisted genome editing of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Nat. Commun. 8: 15179. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15179
- Deveau H, Barrangou R, Garneau JE, Labonte J, Fremaux C, Boyaval P, et al. 2008. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Bacteriol. 190: 1390-1400. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01412-07
- Mojica FJM, Diez-Villasenor C, Garcia-Martinez J, Almendros C. 2009. Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. Microbiology (Reading) 155: 733-740. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.023960-0
- Gasiunas G, Young JK, Karvelis T, Kazlauskas D, Urbaitis T, Jasnauskaite M, et al. 2020. A catalogue of biochemically diverse CRISPR-Cas9 orthologs. Nat. Commun. 11: 5512. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19344-1
- Wang J, Li J, Zhao H, Sheng G, Wang M, Yin M, et al. 2015. Structural and mechanistic basis of PAM-dependent spacer acquisition in CRISPR-Cas systems. Cell 163: 840-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.008
- Collias D, Beisel CL. 2021. CRISPR technologies and the search for the PAM-free nuclease. Nat. Commun. 12: 555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20633-y
- Karvelis T, Gasiunas G, Siksnys V. 2017. Harnessing the natural diversity and in vitro evolution of Cas9 to expand the genome editing toolbox. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 37: 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.009
- Nishimasu H, Ran FA, Hsu PD, Konermann S, Shehata SI, Dohmae N, et al. 2014. Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 156: 935-949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001
- Kleinstiver BP, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, Topkar VV, Nguyen NT, Zheng Z, et al. 2015. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523: 481-485. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14592
- Gao L, Cox DBT, Yan WX, Manteiga JC, Schneider MW, Yamano T, et al. 2017. Engineered Cpf1 variants with altered PAM specificities. Nat. Biotechnol. 35: 789-792. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3900
- Hu JH, Miller SM, Geurts MH, Tang W, Chen L, Sun N, et al. 2018. Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity. Nature 556: 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26155
- Nishimasu H, Shi X, Ishiguro S, Gao L, Hirano S, Okazaki S, et al. 2018. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space. Science 361: 1259-1262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas9129
- Kim B, Kim HJ, Lee SJ. 2020. Regulation of microbial metabolic rates using CRISPR interference with expanded PAM sequences. Front. Microbiol. 11: 282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00282
- Kim B, Kim HJ, Lee SJ. 2020. Effective blocking of microbial transcriptional initiation by dCas9-NG-mediated CRISPR interference. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30: 1919-1926. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2008.08058
- Li D, Zhou H, Zeng X. 2019. Battling CRISPR-Cas9 off-target genome editing. Cell. Biol. Toxicol. 35: 403-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-019-09485-5
- Fu BX, St Onge RP, Fire AZ, Smith JD. 2016. Distinct patterns of Cas9 mismatch tolerance in vitro and in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 44: 5365-5377. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw417
- Lin YN, Cradick TJ, Brown MT, Deshmukh H, Ranjan P, Sarode N, et al. 2014. CRISPR/Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: 7473-7485. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku402
- Chen SJ. 2019. Minimizing off-target effects in CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Cell. Biol. Toxicol. 35: 399-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-019-09486-4
- Chapman JR, Taylor MR, Boulton SJ. 2012. Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell. 47: 497-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.029
- Komor AC, Kim YB, Packer MS, Zuris JA, Liu DR. 2016. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533: 420-424. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17946
- Kim D, Lim K, Kim DE, Kim JS. 2020. Genome-wide specificity of dCpf1 cytidine base editors. Nat. Commun. 11: 4072. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17889-9
- Grunewald J, Zhou R, Iyer S, Lareau CA, Garcia SP, Aryee MJ, et al. 2019. CRISPR DNA base editors with reduced RNA off-target and self-editing activities. Nat. Biotechnol. 37: 1041-1048. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0236-6
- Jeong YK, Song B, Bae S. 2020. Current status and challenges of DNA base editing tools. Mol. Ther. 28: 1938-1952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.07.021
- Lee SS, Ding N, Sun YD, Yuan TL, Li J, Yuan QC, et al. 2020. Single C-to-T substitution using engineered APOBEC3G-nCas9 base editors with minimum genome- and transcriptome-wide off-target effects. Sci. Adv. 6: eaba1773. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba1773
- Sun J, Lu LB, Liang TX, Yang LR, Wu JP. 2020. CRISPR-assisted multiplex base editing system in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8: 905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00905
- Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR, Sousa AA, Koblan LW, Levy JM, et al. 2019. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576: 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4
- Yang L, Chen J. 2020. A tale of two moieties: Rapidly evolving CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing. Trends Biochem. Sci. 45: 874-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2020.06.003
- Arroyo-Olarte RD, Bravo Rodriguez R, Morales-Rios E. 2021. Genome editing in bacteria: CRISPR-Cas and beyond. Microorganisms 9: 844. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040844
- Fu YF, Sander JD, Reyon D, Cascio VM, Joung JK. 2014. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 32: 279-284. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2808
- Li P, Kleinstiver BP, Leon MY, Prew MS, Navarro-Gomez D, Greenwald SH, et al. 2018. Allele-specific CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing of the single-base P23H mutation for rhodopsin-associated dominant retinitis pigmentosa. CRISPR J. 1: 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2017.0009
- Park HM, Liu H, Wu J, Chong A, Mackley V, Fellmann C, et al. 2018. Extension of the crRNA enhances Cpf1 gene editing in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Commun. 9: 3313. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05641-3
- McMahon MA, Prakash TP, Cleveland DW, Bennett CF, Rahdar M. 2018. Chemically modified Cpf1-CRISPR RNAs mediate efficient genome editing in mammalian cells. Mol. Ther. 26: 1228-1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.02.031
- Bin Moon S, Lee JM, Kang JG, Lee NE, Ha DI, Kim DY, et al. 2018. Highly efficient genome editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 using CRISPR RNA with a uridinylate-rich 3'-overhang. Nat. Commun. 9: 3651. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06129-w
- Anderson EM, Haupt A, Schiel JA, Chou E, Machado HB, Strezoska Z, et al. 2015. Systematic analysis of CRISPR-Cas9 mismatch tolerance reveals low levels of off-target activity. J. Biotechnol. 211: 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.06.427
- Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee SJ. 2020. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated pinpoint microbial genome editing aided by target-mismatched sgRNAs. Genome Res. 30: 768-775. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.257493.119
- Kim HJ, Oh SY, and Lee SJ. 2020. Single-base genome editing in Corynebacterium glutamicum with the help of negative selection by target-mismatched CRISPR/Cpf1. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30: 1583-1591. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2006.06036
- Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee SJ. 2021. Mismatch intolerance of 5'-truncated sgRNAs in CRISPR/Cas9 enables efficient microbial single-base genome editing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22: 6457. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126457
- Song B, Yang S, Hwang G-H, Yu J, Bae S. 2021. Analysis of NHEJ-based DNA repair after CRISPR-mediated DNA cleavage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22: 6397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126397
- Rodrigues SD, Karimi M, Impens L, Van Lerberge E, Coussens G, Aesaert S, et al. 2021. Efficient CRISPR-mediated base editing in Agrobacterium spp. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118: e2013338118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013338118
- Hayashi A, Tanaka K. 2019. Short-homology-mediated CRISPR/Cas9-based method for genome editing in fission yeast. G3 (Bethesda) 9: 1153-1163. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.118.200976
- Zhang J, Qian FH, Dong F, Wang QZ, Yang JJ, Jiang Y, et al. 2020. De Novo engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for L-proline production. ACS Synth. Biol. 9: 1897-1906. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00249
- Shen W, Zhang J, Geng B, Qiu M, Hu M, Yang Q, et al. 2019. Establishment and application of a CRISPR-Cas12a assisted genome-editing system in Zymomonas mobilis. Microb. Cell Fact. 18: 162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-019-1219-5
- Zhou D, Jiang Z, Pang Q, Zhu Y, Wang Q, Qi Q. 2019. CRISPR/Cas9-assisted seamless genome editing in Lactobacillus plantarum and its application in N-acetylglucosamine production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85: e01367-01319.
- Krumbach K, Sonntag CK, Eggeling L, Marienhagen J. 2019. CRISPR/Cas12a mediated genome editing to introduce amino acid substitutions into the mechanosensitive channel MscCG of Corynebacterium glutamicum. ACS Synth. Biol. 8: 2726-2734. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00361
- Wege SM, Gejer K, Becker F, Bolker M, Freitag J, Sandrock B. 2021. Versatile CRISPR/Cas9 systems for genome editing in Ustilago maydis. J. Fungi. 7: 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7020149
Cited by
- A Simplified Method for CRISPR-Cas9 Engineering of Bacillus subtilis vol.9, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00754-21