Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Derivation of yield force coefficient for RC frames considering energy balance and P-delta effects

  • Ucar, Taner (Department of Architecture, Dokuz Eylul University) ;
  • Merter, Onur (Department of Civil Engineering, Izmir University of Economics)
  • Received : 2020.05.27
  • Accepted : 2021.05.31
  • Published : 2021.08.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Currently, prominent energy balance concept can efficiently be used to calculate the yield base shear force of structures. Energy balance equation is an additional constraint for the balance of seismic input energy by the energy absorption of the structure. This equation can be defined as the sum of elastic and plastic energies of structural systems using elastic and plastic load-deformation characteristics and the total energy dissipation capacity can finally be equated to the seismic energy demand. The objective of this paper is to present a procedure for the determination of energy-based yield force coefficient of reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures considering P-delta effects. The total of elastic and plastic energies are computed by means of elastic spectral velocity and energy modification factor, which is originally derived for structural systems with geometric nonlinearity. Total inelastic energy of single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system is transformed into the total inelastic energy of the multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) system using the conversion based on structural dynamics. Plastic energy of MDOF system is formulated after total seismic energy demand is obtained. It is accordingly equated to the total work done by inelastic MDOF structure with P-delta effects and consequently, a dimensionless yield force coefficient is derived. Nonlinear static analyses are performed for selected multi-story RC frames and yield force coefficients are compared with the results of the energy-based formulation. The results show that the proposed formulation taking P-delta effects into account can be effectively used to estimate the yield force coefficient of RC frame structures.

Keywords

References

  1. Adam, C. and Jager, C. (2012), "Seismic collapse capacity of basic inelastic structures vulnerable to the P-delta effect", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(4), 775-793. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1157.
  2. Adam, C., Ibarra, L.F. and Krawinkler, H. (2004), "Evaluation of P-delta effects in non-deteriorating MDOF structures from equivalent SDOF systems", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August.
  3. Akbas, B. and Shen, J. (2003), "Earthquake-resistant design (EQRD) and energy concepts", Tech. J., 14(67), 2877-2901. (in Turkish)
  4. Akiyama, H. (1985), Earthquake-Resistant Limit-State Design for Buildings, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Akiyama, H. (2002), "Collapse modes of structures under strong motions of earthquake", Ann. Geophys., 45(6), 791-798, https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3548.
  6. Alici, F.S. and Sucuoglu, H. (2016), "Prediction of input energy spectrum: attenuation models and velocity spectrum scaling", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 45(13), 2137-2161. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2749.
  7. Alici, F.S. and Sucuoglu, H. (2018), "Elastic and inelastic near-fault input energy spectra", Earthq. Spectra, 34(2), 611-637. https://doi.org/10.1193/090817EQS175M.
  8. ASCE (2014), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-13), American Society of Civil Engineers; Reston, Virginia, U.S.A.
  9. Asimakopoulos, A.V., Karabalis, D.L. and Beskos, D.E. (2007), "Inclusion of P-∆ effect in displacement-based seismic design of steel moment resisting frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(14), 2171-2188. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.723.
  10. Beiraghi, H. (2017), "Earthquake effects on the energy demand of tall reinforced concrete walls with buckling-restrained brace outriggers", Struct. Eng. Mech., 63(4), 521-536. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.63.4.521.
  11. Benavent-Climent, A. (2011), "An energy-based method for seismic retrofit of existing frames using hysteretic dampers", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31(10), 1385-1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.015.
  12. Benavent-Climent, A. and Zahran, R. (2010), "Seismic evaluation of existing RC frames with wide beams using an energy-based approach", Earthq. Struct., 1(1), 93-108. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2010.1.1.093.
  13. Calvi, G.M., Priestley, M.J.N. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2008), "Displacement-based seismic design of structures", 3rd Hellenic Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, Athens, Greece, November.
  14. Cheng, Y., Lucchini, A. and Mollaioli, F. (2014), "Proposal of new ground-motion prediction equations for elastic input energy spectra", Earthq. Struct., 7(4), 485-510. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.4.485.
  15. Cheng, Y., Lucchini, A. and Mollaioli, F. (2020), "Ground-motion prediction equations for constant-strength and constant-ductility input energy spectra", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 18(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00725-x.
  16. Choi, H. and Kim, J. (2006), "Energy-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames using hysteretic energy spectrum", Eng. Struct., 28(2), 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.008.
  17. Choi, H. and Kim, J. (2009), "Evaluation of seismic energy demand and its application on design of buckling-restrained braced frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., 31(1), 93-112. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.31.1.093.
  18. Chopra, A.K. (2012), Dynamics of Structures, Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, N.J, U.S.A.
  19. CSI (2018), SAP2000 Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design, Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California.
  20. Di Sarno, L. and Pugliese, F. (2020), "Numerical evaluation of the seismic performance of existing reinforced concrete buildings with corroded smooth rebars", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 18(9), 4227-4273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00854-8.
  21. Dindar, A.A., Yalcin, C., Yuksel, E., Ozkaynak, H. and Buyukozturk, O. (2015), "Development of earthquake energy demand spectra", Earthq. Spectra, 31(3), 1667-1689. https://doi.org/10.1193/011212EQS010M.
  22. Donaire-Avila, L., Benavent-Climent, A., Lucchini, A. and Mollaioli, F. (2017), "Energy-based seismic design methodology: A preliminary approach", 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, January.
  23. Fajfar, P. (2018), "Analysis in seismic provisions for buildings: past, present and future", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 16(7), 2567-2608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0290-8.
  24. FEMA 356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  25. Goel, S.C., Liao, W.C., Bayat, M.R. and Chao, S.H. (2010), "Performance-based plastic design (PBPD) method for earthquake-resistant structures: an overview", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 19(1-2), 115 137. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.547.
  26. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H. (2000), "Dynamic P-delta effects for flexible inelastic steel structures", J. Struct. Eng., 126(1), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(145).
  27. Han, S.W., Kwon, O.S. and Lee, L.H. (2001), "Investigation of dynamic P-∆ effect on ductility factor", Struct. Eng. Mech., 12(3), 249-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.12.3.249.
  28. Housner, G.W. (1956), "Limit design of structures to resist earthquakes", Proceedings of the 1st World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Oakland, California, U.S.A.
  29. Kazantzi, A.K. and Vamvatsikos, D. (2012), "A study on the correlation between dissipated hysteretic energy and seismic performance", 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal, September.
  30. Kumbhar, O.G. and Kumar, R. (2020), "Performance assessment of RC frame designed using force, displacement & energy based approach", Struct. Eng. Mech., 73(6), 699-714. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.73.6.699.
  31. Lee, S.S. and Goel, S.C. (2001), "Performance-based design of steel moment frames using target drift and yield mechanism", Report No. UMCEE 01-17, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, U.S.A.
  32. Leelataviwat, S. (1998), "Drift and yield mechanism based seismic design and upgrading of steel moment frames", Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, U.S.A.
  33. Leelataviwat, S., Goel, S.C. and Stojadinovic, B. (2002), "Energy-based seismic design of structures using yield mechanism and target drift", J. Struct. Eng., 128(8), 1046-1054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1046).
  34. Leelataviwat, S., Saewon, W. and Goel, S.C. (2008), "An energy based method for seismic evaluation of structures", 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Bejing, China, October.
  35. Liao, W.C. (2010), "Performance based plastic design of earthquake resistant reinforced concrete moment frames", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, U.S.A.
  36. Lopez, S.E., Ayala, A.G. and Adam, C. (2015), "A novel displacement-based seismic design method for framed structures considering P-Delta induced dynamic instability", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13(4), 1227-1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9688-8.
  37. Massumi, A. and Monavari, B. (2013), "Energy based procedure to obtain target displacement of reinforced concrete structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 48(5), 681-695. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.48.5.681.
  38. Mezgebo, M.G. and Lui, E.M. (2016), "Hysteresis and soil site dependent input and hysteretic energy spectra for far-source ground motions", Adv. Civil Eng., 2016, Article ID 1548319. http://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1548319.
  39. Mezgebo, M.G. and Lui, E.M. (2017), "A new methodology for energy-based seismic design of steel moment frames", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 16(1), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0373-1.
  40. Montgomery, C.J. (1981), "Influence of P-Delta effects on seismic design", Can. J. Civil Eng., 8(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1139/l81-005.
  41. Panagiotidou, A.I., Gazetas, G. and Gerolymos, N. (2012), "Pushover and seismic response of foundations on stiff clay: analysis with P-delta effects", Earthq. Spectra, 28(4), 1589-1618. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000084.
  42. Pettinga, D. and Priestley, N. (2008), "Accounting for P-delta effects in structures when using direct displacement-based design", 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Bejing, China, October.
  43. Pettinga, J.D. and Priestley, M.J.N. (2007), "Accounting for P-delta effects in structures when using direct displacement-based design", Research Report ROSE-2007/02, European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  44. Pourali, N., Khosravi, H. and Dehestani, M. (2019), "An investigation of P-delta effect in conventional seismic design and direct displacement-based design using elasto-plastic SDOF systems", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 17(1), 313-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0460-3.
  45. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007), Displacement-based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  46. Priestley, M.J.N. (2000), "Performance based seismic design", Bull. NZ Soc. Earthq. Eng., 33(3), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.33.3.325-346.
  47. Priestley, M.J.N. (2003), Myths and Fallacies in Earthquake Engineering, Revisited (The Mallet-Milne Lecture), IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  48. Qiu, C., Qi, J. and Chen, C. (2020), "Energy-based seismic design methodology of SMABFs using hysteretic energy spectrum", J. Struct. Eng., 146(2), 04019207. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002515.
  49. Samimifar, M., Massumi, A. and Moghadam, A.S. (2019), "A new practical equivalent linear model for estimating seismic hysteretic energy demand of bilinear systems", Struct. Eng. Mech., 70(3), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.70.3.289.
  50. Segovia, V.A. and Ruiz, S.E. (2017), "Direct displacement-based design for buildings with hysteretic dampers, using best combinations of stiffness and strength ratios", J. Earthq. Eng., 21(5), 752-775. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1185054.
  51. Sucuoglu, H. and Akkar, S. (2014), Basic Earthquake Engineering from Seismology to Analysis and Design, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
  52. Sun, G., Gu, Q. and Fang, Y. (2017), "A simplified normalized cumulative hysteretic energy spectrum", Earthq. Struct., 12(1), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.177.
  53. TBEC (2018), Turkish Building Earthquake Code, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement; Ankara, Turkey.
  54. Teran-Gilmore, A., Sanchez-Badillo, A. and Espinosa-Johnson, M. (2010), "Performance-based seismic design of reinforced concrete ductile buildings subjected to large energy demands", Earthq. Struct., 1(1), 69-91. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2010.1.1.069.
  55. Ucar, T. and Merter, O. (2018), "Derivation of energy-based base shear force coefficient considering hysteretic behavior and P-delta effects", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 17(1), 149-163, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0431-3.
  56. Wang, F., Zhang, N. and Huang, Z. (2016), "Estimation of earthquake induced story hysteretic energy of multi-story buildings", Earthq. Struct., 11(1), 165-178. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.1.165.
  57. Zhou, Y., Song, G., Huang, S. and Wu, H. (2019), "Input energy spectra for self-centering SDOF systems", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 121, 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.03.017.