Journal of Christian Education in Korea (기독교교육논총)

The Korean Society of Christian Religious Education (한국기독교교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Design and Development of Interactive Non-Face-to-Face Real-Time Classes using EduTech : A Case Study of Christian Education Class

에듀테크를 활용한 상호작용적 비대면 실시간 수업 설계 및 개발 연구 : 기독교교육과 수업 사례를 중심으로

  • Received : 2021.05.12
  • Accepted : 2021.06.27
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is a case study in which the interactive non-face-to-face classes using Edutech were applied to the Department of Christian Education. The subjects were 20 students from the Christian education department of A University located in the metropolitan area. The course was 'Instructional Methods and Educational Technology' in the first semester of 2020. In theory, I studied non-face-to-face classes and interaction, and edutech and interaction. Afterward, it designed and developed interactive non-face-to-face classes using edutech. The interactive non-face-to-face classes using edutech were developed as a process of applying Flipped-PBL based interactive edutech. In addition, Edutech was selected for active interaction according to the Flipped-PBL process to be carried out in a non-face-to-face situation. In particular, in the process of developing the problem of PBL, it was built around the situation of the church. As a result of applying the class, first, learners showed high satisfaction and interest in the class. Second, positive transference appeared in the space of learning and the space of living. Third, interactive non-face-to-face classes using Edutech have generated active interaction. In particular, interactive edutech and learning methods have become the main factors enabling active interaction. Through this, learners have improved learning efficiency, immersion, and satisfaction. Also, as an alternative to face-to-face classes, I was able to experience online classes. In other words, the satisfaction and interest of learning, and the transference of learning space, were also possible through active interactions generated through learning methods using interactive Edutech used in class. Furthermore, disabilities in the online communication(Internet) environment and learners' unfamiliarity with the online environment have been found as factors that hinder learning satisfaction and interaction. During learning, obstacles to the online communication environment hinder the utilization of interactive Edutech, preventing active interactions from occurring. This results in diminishing satisfaction and interest in learning. Therefore, we find that designing interactive non-face-to-face classes using Edutech requires sufficient learner learning and checking of the online communication(Internet) environment in advance for Edutech and learning methods. In response, this study confirmed the possibility by applying interactive non-face-to-face classes using Edutech to Christian education classes as an alternative method of education that allows active interaction and consistent transference of learning and life. Although it is a case study with limited duration and limitations of the number of people, I would like to present the possibility as an alternative Christian education method of an era where the direction of online classes should be presented as an alternative to a face-to-face class.

본 연구는 에듀테크를 활용한 상호작용적 비대면 수업을 기독교교육과 수업에 적용한 사례 연구로 수도권에 위치한 A대학교의 기독교교육과에 개설된 교직필수 과목인 '교육방법 및 교육공학' 과목 수강생 20명을 대상으로 2020년 1학기에 진행되었다. 이를 위해 비대면 수업과 상호작용, 에듀테크와 상호작용에 관한 이론적 연구를 진행 한 후 에듀테크를 활용한 상호작용적 비대면 수업을 설계 및 개발했다. 에듀테크를 활용한 상호작용적 비대면 수업은 Flipped-PBL을 기반으로 상호작용적 에듀테크를 적용시키는 과정으로 개발했다. 또한 비대면 상황가운데서 진행될 Flipped-PBL 과정에 따라 적극적인 상호작용이 가능한 에듀테크를 선정 및 활용할 수 있도록 했다. 특히 수업 설계 및 개발의 과정에 있어서는 기독교교육과를 대상으로 하는 교직과목인 '교육방법 및 교육공학'의 특성을 살려 기독교교육적인 특성을 살려 실천적 사역현장인 교회를 중심으로 문제를 개발하고 수업을 진행했다. 수업 적용결과 첫째, 학습자들은 수업에 대해 높은 만족도와 흥미도는 보였으며, 둘째, 학습의 공간과 생활의 공간에 긍정적인 전이가 나타났다. 셋째, 에듀테크를 활용한 상호작용적 비대면 수업은 학습 간에 적극적인 상호작용이 가능하도록 했다. 특히 상호작용적 에듀테크와 학습방법은 적극적인 상호작용이 가능하게 하는 주요한 요인이 되었다. 이를 통해 학습자들은 학습의 효율성과 몰입, 그리고 만족도가 높아짐으로 인해 대면수업의 대안으로서 온라인 수업을 경험할 수 있었다. 즉 앞선 학습의 만족도와 흥미, 학습 공간의 전이 또한 수업 간에 상호작용적 에듀테크를 활용한 교육방법을 통해 발생된 적극적인 상호작용을 통해 가능했다. 그러나 학습에 대한 만족의 저해 및 상호작용의 방해 요인으로는 통신(인터넷) 환경적 요인과 학습자의 온라인 기반 환경에 대한 인식이 주요함이 나타났다. 학습 중에 통신 환경의 장애는 상호작용적 에듀테크를 활용하는데 방해를 일으켜 적극적인 상호작용이 발생하지 못하게 하였고, 이로 인해 학습의 만족과 흥미를 하락시키는 결과를 가지고 왔다. 또한 학습자에게 익숙하지 않은 온라인 학습환경도 적극적인 상호작용의 방해 요인으로 제시되었다. 그럼으로 에듀테크를 활용한 상호작용적 비대면 수업을 설계함에 있어서 사전에 에듀테크 및 학습 방법에 대한 충분한 학습자 교육과 통신(인터넷) 환경에 대한 점검이 필요함을 알게 되었다. 이에 본 연구는 온라인 시대 가운데에 적극적인 상호작용과 학습과 생활의 일치적 전이가 가능한 대안적 교육방법으로서 에듀테크를 활용한 상호작용적 비대면 수업을 기독교교육과 수업에 적용하여 그 가능성을 확인했다. 제한적인 기간과 인원이라는 한계성을 가지고 있는 사례 연구임에도 불구하고, 대면수업의 대안으로서 온라인 수업의 방향성을 제시해야 할 시대 속에서 대안적 기독교교육방법으로서의 가능성을 제시해보고자 했다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang. B. J., Paik. Y. S. (2013). The relationships between teachers' burn out and teacher-young children interactions in the mediating effects instructional creativity and teaching efficacy of day care center teachers. Journal of Children's Media & Education, 12(1), 145-168.
  2. Ministry of Education (2019). White paper on educational informatization. Ministry of Education
  3. Ministry of Education (2020. 12. 31.). Corona 19 response status data in the education field. Ministry of Education press release
  4. Ministry of Education (2020. 12. 9). Ministry of education's 2 bills passed the main assembly of the national assembly. Ministry of Education press release
  5. Ministry of Education (2021. 1. 3.). Major policy improvements of the ministry of education in 2021 (24 selections). Ministry of Education press release
  6. Kim. M. E., Kim. M. J., Oh. I. Y., Jung. S. Y. (2020). The effect of online substitution class cuased by coronavirus(COVID-19) on the learning motivation, instructor-learner interaction, and class satisfaction of nursing students. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(17), 519-541.
  7. Kim. S. Y. et al. (2017). Research on intelligent information technology customized educational service support plan. Ministry of Education.
  8. Kim. E. Y. (2012). Case study about participants' interaction pattern and feature on informal learning space. Master's thesis at the Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
  9. Kim. J. J. (2019). Humanities of Christian education in the 4th industrial revolution era. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 59, 125-158
  10. Nam. S. W. (2020). The effect of Flipped-PBL on the communication and problem solving skills. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 64, 347-368.
  11. Nam. S. W., Chang. H. S. (2020). A case study of instruction based on the design thinking as an methodology of Christian education. Theology and Society, 34(1), 22-55.
  12. Roo. B. L., Kim. J. A., Lee. S. E., Han. H. J., Lee. E. M., Lee. J. T. Choi. H. S., (2018). Education in the 4th industrial revolution. KEDI. RR 2018-01
  13. Park. N. R. (2014). The effects of message facilitation types on interaction, learning presence, and learning satisfaction in online discussion. Master's thesis at the Graduate School of Joongang University.
  14. Back. J. Y. (2018). Edutech's technology and content trends. Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation, 1855, 14-28.
  15. Suh. H. J., Kang. M. H. (2005). Relationships among learner characteristics, peer interactions, and learning outcome in the online learning community. Journal of Educational Technology, 21(5), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.21.2.1
  16. Song. Y. H., Chang. H. S. (2018). A case study on co-teaching and project learning in the integrated class of Christian education department. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 55, 271-304.
  17. Ahn. S. Y. (2000). The teacher-child interaction and the child-peer interaction in free play time. Master's thesis at the Graduate School of Ewha Womans University.
  18. Yoo. J. E. (2020). Structural relationship among self-directed learning ability, learner-instructor interaction, learner-learner interaction, and class satisfaction in online learning environments. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 63, 255-281
  19. Yoon. I. Y. (2017). Convergence of education and ICT technology, Edutech. Convergence Research Policy Center.
  20. Lee. D. J., Kim. M. S. (2020). University students' perceptions on the practices of online learning in the COVID-19 situation and future directions. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 359-377.
  21. Lee. B. Y. (2021). The study on consumers' intention to use edutech by applying UTAUT and experience economy theory : Focusing on the moderating effect of perceived risk. Master's thesis at the Graduate School of Ewha Womans University.
  22. Lee. S. A., Lee. E. C., Nam. S. W. (2019). The effect of Flipped-PBL on the self directed learning skills. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 58, 119-146.
  23. Lee. Y. J. (2020. 9. 13). The advantages and disadvantages of remote classes selected by students. Yonhapnews
  24. Lee. Y. S., Shin. D. K. (2020). An investigation of the implementation of online classes in the untact era caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 23(4), 39-57. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2020.23.4.39
  25. Lee. E. C. (2013). The effect of group composition according to rapport levels on interaction in online collaborative learning environment. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 51(3), 57-82.
  26. Jung. M. H., Na. Y. J., Kim. S. Y. (2020). An analytical study on the awareness and demands of professors and students in introducing edutech in University: Focusing on the case of D university. CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 41(3), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.18612/CNUJES.2020.41.3.31
  27. Cho. I. S. (2020). Issues and improvement tasks related to distance learning in university. National Assembly Research Service.
  28. Jo. J. Y. (2011). Study on the relationship of learning outcome and social presence to interaction aspects in an online learning community. Master's thesis at the Graduate School of Ewha Womans University.
  29. Choi. M. A. (1999). A study of teachers' job satisfaction and the mutual interaction between teachers and children in the kindergartens. Master's thesis at the Graduate School of Ewha Womans University.
  30. Choi. Y., Kim. B. C. (2000). A study of interactivity in internet newspapers: A content analysis of interactive mechanism in korean internet newspapers. Korean journal of journalism & communication studies, 44(4), 172-200.
  31. Choi. J. S., Kwon. M. K., Choi. E. K. (2020). A study on the instructor perceptions and satisfaction levels of real-time online classes: Focusing on the case of korean language program at D university. Journal of Dong-ak Language and Literature, 81, 135-168. https://doi.org/10.25150/dongak.2020..81.005
  32. Choi. H. Y. (2004). Children's peer interactions in relation to teacher's beliefs and teacher behaviors. Doctor's thesis at the Graduate School of Yonsei University.
  33. Anderson, S. E. (2003). The school district role in educational change: A review of the literature. Research on the role of the district, ICEC, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
  34. Gilbert, L. & Moore, D. R. (1998). Building interactivity into web courses: Tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 38(3), 29-35.
  35. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 117-136). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  36. Heo, H., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1383-1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.012
  37. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review.
  38. Huang, L., Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2017). Antecedents of student MOOC revisit intention: Moderation effect of course difficulty. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.12.002
  39. Joe, I. (2020). Study on operational case of non-face-to-face real time online Korean clases and improvement direction: Focused on the ful-scale operation of Korean language education instiutions. Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language, 58, 241-265. https://doi.org/10.21716/TKFL.58.9
  40. Kurucay, M., & Inan, F. A. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers & Education, 115, 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010
  41. Lin, C. H., Zheng, B., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Interactions and learning outcomes in online language courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 730-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12457
  42. Luo, N., Zhang, M., & Qi, D. (2017). Effects of different interactions on students' sense of community in e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 115, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.006
  43. Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sanchez, R., & Vallespin-Aran, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012
  44. Moller, L. (1998). Designing communities of learners for asynchronous distance education. Education Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299678
  45. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view wadsworth. Belmont, CA.
  46. Rodriguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). E-learning continuance: The impact of interactivity and the mediating role of imagery, presence and flow. Information & Management, 53(4), 504-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.11.005
  47. Zhang, D. J., Allon, G., & Van Mieghem, J. A. (2017). Does social interaction improve learning outcomes? Evidence from field experiments on massive open online courses. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19(3), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2016.0615