DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of ZrO2 nanoparticles addition on flexural properties of denture base resin with different thickness

  • Albasarah, Sara (College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University) ;
  • Al Abdulghani, Hanan (College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University) ;
  • Alaseef, Nawarah (College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University) ;
  • al-Qarni, Faisal D. (Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University) ;
  • Akhtar, Sultan (Department of Biophysics, Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University) ;
  • Khan, Soban Q. (Department of Dental Education, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University) ;
  • Ateeq, Ijlal Shahrukh (Biomedical Engineering department, College of Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University) ;
  • Gad, Mohammed M. (Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University)
  • Received : 2021.05.23
  • Accepted : 2021.08.09
  • Published : 2021.08.31

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of incorporating zirconium oxide nanoparticles (nano-ZrO2) in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) denture base resin on flexural properties at different material thicknesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Heat polymerized acrylic resin specimens (N = 120) were fabricated and divided into 4 groups according to denture base thickness (2.5 mm, 2.0 mm, 1.5 mm, 1.0 mm). Each group was subdivided into 3 subgroups (n = 10) according to nano-ZrO2 concentration (0%, 2.5%, and 5%). Flexural strength and elastic modulus were evaluated using a three-point bending test. One-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc, and two-way ANOVA were used for data analysis (α = .05). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for fracture surface analysis and nanoparticles distributions. RESULTS. Groups with 0% nano-ZrO2 showed no significant difference in the flexural strength as thickness decreased (P = .153). The addition of nano-zirconia significantly increased the flexural strength (P < .001). The highest value was with 5% nano-ZrO2 and 2 mm-thickness (125.4 ± 18.3 MPa), followed by 5% nano-ZrO2 and 1.5 mm-thickness (110.3 ± 8.5 MPa). Moreover, the effect of various concentration levels on elastic modulus was statistically significant for 2 mm thickness (P = .001), but the combined effect of thickness and concentration on elastic modulus was insignificant (P = .10). CONCLUSION. Reinforcement of denture base material with nano-ZrO2 significantly increased flexural strength and modulus of elasticity. Reducing material thickness did not decrease flexural strength when nano-ZrO2 was incorporated. In clinical practice, when low thickness of denture base material is indicated, PMMA/nano-ZrO2 could be used with minimum acceptable thickness of 1.5 mm.

Keywords

References

  1. Rickman LJ, Padipatvuthikul P, Satterthwaite JD. Contemporary denture base resins: part 1. Dent Update 2012;39:25-8, 30. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2012.39.1.25
  2. Revised American Dental Association specification no. 12 for denture base polymers. J Am Dent Assoc 1975;90:451-8. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1975.0069
  3. Wieckiewicz M, Opitz V, Richter G, Boening KW. Physical properties of polyamide-12 versus PMMA denture base material. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:150298. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/150298
  4. Zakkula SBS, Anne G, Manne P, Bindu O SH, Atla J, Deepthi S, Chaitanya AK. Evaluation of palatal plate thickness of maxillary prosthesis on phonation- a comparative clinical study. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:ZC11-3.
  5. Mazaro JV, Gennari Filho H, Vedovatto E, Amoroso AP, Pellizzer EP, Zavanelli AC. Influence of different base thicknesses on maxillary complete denture processing: linear and angular graphic analysis on the movement of artificial teeth. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:1661-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e5d8c
  6. Rodrigues AH. Metal reinforcement for implant-supported mandibular overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:511-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70006-0
  7. Khuder T, Yunus N, Sulaiman E, Dabbagh A. Finite element analysis and clinical complications in mandibular implant-overdentures opposing maxillary dentures. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017;75:97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.039
  8. Dong J, Ikebe K, Gonda T, Nokubi T. Influence of abutment height on strain in a mandibular overdenture. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:594-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01602.x
  9. Choi M, Acharya V, Berg RW, Marotta J, Green CC, Barbizam JV, White SN. Resinous denture base fracture resistance: effects of thickness and teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:53-9.
  10. Berry HH, Funk OJ. Vitallium strengthener to prevent lower denture breakage. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:532-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90013-8
  11. Gonda T, Ikebe K, Dong J, Nokubi T. Effect of reinforcement on overdenture strain. J Dent Res 2007;86:667-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600716
  12. Jagger DC, Harrison A, Jandt KD. The reinforcement of dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:185-94. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00375.x
  13. Gad MM, Fouda SM, Al-Harbi FA, Napankangas R, Raustia A. PMMA denture base material enhancement: a review of fiber, filler, and nanofiller addition. Int J Nanomedicine 2017;12:3801-12. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S130722
  14. Gad M, ArRejaie AS, Abdel-Halim MS, Rahoma A. The reinforcement effect of nano-zirconia on the transverse strength of repaired acrylic denture base. Int J Dent 2016;2016:7094056.
  15. Leao RS, Moraes SLD, Gomes JML, Lemos CAA, Casado BGDS, Vasconcelos BCDE, Pellizzer EP. Influence of addition of zirconia on PMMA: a systematic review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2020;106:110292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110292
  16. Asar NV, Albayrak H, Korkmaz T, Turkyilmaz I. Influence of various metal oxides on mechanical and physical properties of heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate denture base resins. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:241-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.241
  17. Gad MM, Rahoma A, Al-Thobity AM, ArRejaie AS. Influence of incorporation of ZrO2 nanoparticles on the repair strength of polymethyl methacrylate denture bases. Int J Nanomedicine 2016;11:5633-43. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S120054
  18. Zidan S, Silikas N, Haider J, Alhotan A, Jahantigh J, Yates J. Evaluation of equivalent flexural strength for complete removable dentures made of zirconia-impregnated PMMA nanocomposites. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:2580. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112580
  19. Zhang XY, Zhang XJ, Huang ZL, Zhu BS, Chen RR. Hybrid effects of zirconia nanoparticles with aluminum borate whiskers on mechanical properties of denture base resin PMMA. Dent Mater J 2014;33:141-6. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-054
  20. Yu W, Wang X, Tang Q, Guo M, Zhao J. Reinforcement of denture base PMMA with ZrO2 nanotubes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;32:192-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.01.003
  21. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater 2012;28:467-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.009
  22. Liua M JZ, Jiab D, Zhou C. Recent advance in research on halloysite nanotubes-polymer nanocomposite. Prog Polym Sci 2014;39:1498-525 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.04.004
  23. Caravaca C, Shi L, Balvay S, Rivory P, Laurenceau E, Chevolot Y, Hartmann D, Gremillard L, Chevalier J. Direct silanization of zirconia for increased biointegration. Acta Biomater 2016;46:323-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.034
  24. Otsuka T, Chujo Y. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-based hybrid materials with reactive zirconium oxide nanocrystals. Polym J 2010;42:58-65. https://doi.org/10.1038/pj.2009.309
  25. Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S. Sample size determination in health studies: a practical manual. 1st ed. Geneva; Wold Health Organization; 1991. p. 1-22.
  26. Takahashi Y, Yoshida K, Shimizu H. Fracture resistance of maxillary complete dentures subjected to long-term water immersion. Gerodontology 2012;29:e1086-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00616.x
  27. Gad MM, Al-Thobity AM, Fouda SM, Napankangas R, Raustia A. Flexural and surface properties of PMMA denture base material modified with thymoquinone as an antifungal agent. J Prosthodont 2020;29:243-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12967
  28. Tokgoz S, Ozdiler A, Gencel B, Bozdag E, Isik-Ozkol G. Effects of denture base thicknesses and reinforcement on fracture strength in mandibular implant overdenture with bar attachment: under various acrylic resin types. Eur J Dent 2019;13:64-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688533
  29. Fajardo RS, Pruitt LA, Finzen FC, Marshall GW, Singh S, Curtis DA. The effect of E-glass fibers and acrylic resin thickness on fracture load in a simulated implant-supported overdenture prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:373-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60150-9
  30. Kaehler T. Nanotechnology: basic concepts and definitions. Clin Chem 1994;40:1797-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/40.9.1797
  31. Hameed HK, Rahman HA. The effect of addition nano particle ZrO2 on some properties of autoclave processed heat cure acrylic denture base material. J Baghdad Coll Dent 2015;27:32-9. https://doi.org/10.12816/0015262
  32. Wada H, Seika M, Kennedy TC, Calder CA, Murase K. Investigation of loading rate and plate thickness effects on dynamic fracture toughness of PMMA. Eng Fract Mech 1996;54:805-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(95)00244-8
  33. Ajaj-Alkordy NM, Alsaadi MH. Elastic modulus and flexural strength comparisons of high-impact and traditional denture base acrylic resins. Saudi Dent J 2014;26:15-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2013.12.005
  34. Keyf F, Uzun G. The effects of glass fiber reinforcement at different concentrations on the transverse strength, deflection and modulus of elasticity of a provisional fixed partial denture resin. J Biomater Appl 2001;16:149-56. https://doi.org/10.1106/BGNY-V5DA-VMWB-TC2W