DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Normative Review on Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis (NIPD): Focusing on the German Discussion on PrenaTest®

  • 투고 : 2021.03.11
  • 심사 : 2021.05.23
  • 발행 : 2021.06.30

초록

This article aims to introduce German discussion on the approval of the non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD), which started with the development of PrenaTest® by LifeCodexx AG. The discussion started with the concern that the non-invasive nature of NIPD, such as PrenaTest®, may rapidly expand the use and scope of similar tests, thus leading to a new era of eugenics. Based on this concern, the need for clear clinical guidelines on specific indications for NIPD has been suggested. Along the same line, it was discussed whether PrenaTest® is against the Basic Law prohibiting discrimination on grounds of disability and whether the test is outside the scope of the purpose of gene testing limited by Genetic Diagnosis Act. Through such discussion, the Federal Ministry of Health of Germany established the preconditions for inclusion of NIPD in the German public health insurance system. For this, the German motherhood guideline was amended and the information for the insured persons provided to pregnant women was included in the amended guideline. Such discussion made in Germany provides insight on which points should be considered when various gene testings are accepted in Korea, in which genetic communication has not been systematized yet. In particular, German counseling system for pregnant women will provide valuable insights for Korea where the direction for regulations on abortion has not been established even after the ruling by the Constitutional Court that charges for abortion are against the constitution.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Sungshin University Research Grant of 2019.

참고문헌

  1. Arztebl D (2014) Genanalysen in der schwangerenvorsorge: Keine zeit zum nachdenken. Dtsch Arztebl 111:A1806, B1550, C1482.
  2. Arzteblatt D (2013) 6.000 Down-Syndrom-Bluttests im ersten Jahrw. Available from: https://www.aerzteblatt.de/treffer?mode=s&wo=1041&typ=1&nid=55602&s=prenatest. Accessed at May 1, 2021.
  3. Arzteblatt D (2014) Kammer Hessen fordert klare Richtlinien fur genetische Pranataltests. Available from: https://www.aerzteblatt.de/treffer?mode=s&wo=1041&typ=1&nid=58105&s=prenatest. Accessed at May 1, 2021.
  4. Garditz KF (2012) Gutachtliche Stellungnahme zur Zulassigkeit des Diagnostikprodukts "PrenaTest". Beauftragten der Bunderegierung fur die Belange behinderter Menschen, Bonn, Germany.
  5. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss [G-BA] (2019) Zusammenfassende dokumentation: Beratungsverfahren methodenbewertung mutterschafts-richtlinien. Available from: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/40-268-6008/2019-09-19_Mu-RL_NIPT_ZD.pdf. Accessed at May 1, 2021.
  6. Henn W, Schmitz D (2012) Pranataldiagnostik: Paradigmenwechsel. Deutsches Arzteblatt 109:A1306, B1129, C-1111.
  7. Hufen F (2013) Zur verfassungrechtlichen Beurteilung fruhzeitiger pranataler Diagnostik. Available from: https://docplayer.org/15811184-Zur-verfassungsrechtlichen-beurteilungfruehzeitiger-praenataler-diagnostik.html. Accessed at May 1, 2021.
  8. Kim NK (2007) Termination of pregnancy on the ground of fetal disability. J Crim Law 19:127-165.
  9. Kim NK (2009) A note on the normative control method of medical practice: Justification of voluntary non-health care benefits control in the light of the German medical insurance system. Hum Right Justice 392:73-89.
  10. Kim NK (2015) Hermeneutical understanding of disabilities and law: Legal policy of gene testing in Korean Bioethics and Biosafety Act. J Korean Bioeth Assoc 16:67-84.
  11. Kim NK (2016) Understanding the legal structure of german human gene testing act. J Korean Soc Law Med 17:85-124.
  12. LifeCodexx. (2021) PrenaTest®. Available from: https://lifecodexx.com/en/expectant-mothers/prenatest/. Accessed at May 1, 2021.