DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Significance and Limitations of Record Continuum in Electronic Record Environment: Focusing on Meaning and Nature of Records

전자기록 환경에서 레코드 컨티뉴엄의 의의와 한계: 기록의 의미 및 속성을 중심으로

  • Received : 2021.07.19
  • Accepted : 2021.08.12
  • Published : 2021.08.31

Abstract

Record continuum is a theory providing the basis for archival science in the paradigm shift to the electronic record environment. However, critical analysis of it has been hardly performed so far, as it is still in development, and its core is a new perspective on records different from the life cycle model. Therefore, for further understanding of the significance and limitations of record continuum in the electronic record environment and performance of more in-depth theoretical development, an analysis of the meaning and nature of records contained in record continuum logic is essential. Given that record continuum does not define a record separately, the meaning and nature of records it contains in the recent electronic record environment are examined through the analysis of axis and dimension in a record continuum model.

레코드 컨티뉴엄은 전자기록 환경으로 이행하는 패러다임 전환기에 기록학의 기반을 제공하는 이론임에도 불구하고, 이에 대한 비판적 분석을 그동안 거의 수행되지 않았다. 레코드 컨티뉴엄은 아직 개발이 진행 중인 이론으로, 핵심은 라이프사이클 모델과는 다른 기록에 대한 새로운 시각이다. 따라서 전자기록 환경에서 레코드 컨티뉴엄이 지닌 의미 및 한계를 분석하고 보다 심도 있는 이론적 개발을 위해서는 레코드 컨티뉴엄 논리 속에 함유된 기록의 의미 및 속성에 대한 분석이 필수적으로 요구된다. 하지만 레코드 컨티뉴엄에서는 기록에 대해 별도로 정의를 내리지 않고 있다. 이에 본고에서는 최근의 전자기록 환경에서 레코드 컨티뉴엄 이론 속에 함유된 기록의 의미 및 속성을 축선 및 차원 분석을 통해 고찰하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 우선 기록의 의미 및 속성 도출을 위한 기초 작업으로, 컨티뉴엄 모델상의 차원 1 및 차원 2에 초점을 맞추어 분석을 수행하였다. 이어 컨티뉴엄 논리 속에 함유된 기록의 의미 및 속성을 라이프사이클 모델과 결부시켜 고찰하였으며, 이를 기반으로 컨티뉴엄이 지닌 의의를 고찰한 다음, 기록의 의미 및 속성 관점에서 컨티뉴엄이 지닌 한계를 제시하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2020S1A5B5A16082244).

References

  1. Kim, Myoung Hun (2010). Records Continuum, Appraisal and Archival Contents: Building the Concept of Archival Contents. Journal of Information Management, 41(3), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2010.41.3.131
  2. Kim, Myoung Hun (2017). A Study on the Meaning of Record Contents Based on Record Continuum: Focusing on the Record Contents of Religious Institutions. Korean Society of Archival Studies, 52, 246-281. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2017.52.246
  3. Kim, Myoung Hun (2021). A Study on the Origin of Record Continuum Theory: Focusing on the Comparison with Record Lifecycle Model. Korean Society of Archival Studies, 68, 5-39. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2021.68.005
  4. Ko, Young Bok (2000). Dictionary of Sociology. Seoul: Socio-Culture Research Press.
  5. Lee, Seung Eok (2001). The Prospect of 'Recordkeeping Regime' in the Public Sector of Korea: Examination on the characteristics of the Tables of Transactions for Records Scheduling by PRA Act. Korean Society of Archival Studies, 4, 31-62. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2001.4.031
  6. Noh, Meung Hoan (2016). Understanding of Records/Archives and Archives Management Based on the Semiotics and Constructivism of Sunglihak: Focused on the Understanding and Supplement of Records. Continuum. Journal of History and Culture, 57, 149-219.
  7. Won, Jong Kwan (2007). A Study on Reconciliation of Evidence and Memory Based on the Characteristics of the Records Continuum. Thesis of Master in Department of Information and Records Management, Graduate School of Hankook University of Foreign Studies.
  8. Atherton, J. (1985~1986). From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management-Archives Relationship. Archivaria, 21, 43-51.
  9. Bailey, C. (1989~1990). Archival Theory and Electronic Records. Archivaria, 29, 180-196.
  10. Bearman, D. (1994). Electronic Evidence: Strategies for Managing Records in Contemporary Organizations. Pittsburgh: Archives & Museum Information.
  11. Bettington, J. (2004). Standardised Recordkeeping: Reality or Illusion?. Archives & Manuscripts, 32(2), 46-69.
  12. Brothman, B. (2001). The Past that Archives Keep: Memory, History, and the Preservation of Archival Records. Archivaria, 51, 48-80.
  13. Brothman, B. (2002). Afterglow: Conceptions of Records and Evidence in Archival Discourse. Archival Science, 2(3/4), 311-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435627
  14. Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (1996). The Social Life of Documents. First Monday, 1(1). Available: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/466/820
  15. Cook, T. (2000). Beyond the Screen: The Records Continuum and Archival Cultural Heritage. Paper presented at the Australian Society of Archivists Conference. Available: http://www.mybestdocs.com/cook-t-beyondthescreen-000818.htm
  16. Cook, T. (2001). Archival Science and Postmodernism: New Formulations for Old Concepts. Archival Science, 1(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435636
  17. Cox, J. R. (2001). Managing Records as Evidence and Information. Westport, Conn.: Quorum Books.
  18. Duff, W. (1995). Defining Transactions to Identify Records and Assess Risk. Cox, J. R. ed. University of Pittsburgh Recordkeeping Functional Requirements Project: Reports and Working Papers - Progress Report 2.(LIS057/LS95001). Pittsburgh: School of Library and Information Science, University of Pittsburgh.
  19. Duranti, L., Eastwood, T., & MacNeil, H. (2002). Preservation of the Integrity of Electronic Records. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  20. Flynn, J. A. S. (2001). The Records Continuum Model in Context and Its Implications for Archival Practice. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 22(1), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810120037522
  21. Giddens, A. (1998). Sociology. 김미숙, 김용학, 박길성, 송호근, 신광영, 유홍준, 정성호 옮김 (1998). 현대 사회학(3판). 서울: 을유문화사.
  22. Harris, V. (2005). Recordkeeping and Records Continuum Thinkers: Examining a Seminal Australian Text. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(2), 160-170.
  23. Hartland, R., McKemmish, S., & Upward, F. (2005). Documents. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B., & Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
  24. Hofman, H. (2005). Archive. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B. & Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
  25. Hoke, E. J. G. (2011). Records Life Cycle: A Cradle-to-Grave Metaphor. Information Management Journal, 45(5), 28-32.
  26. Hurley, C. (1998). The Making and Keeping of Records(1): What Are Finding Aids For?. Archives & Manuscripts, 26(1), 58-77.
  27. Karabinos, M. (2018). In the Shadows of the Continuum: Testing the Records Continuum Model through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office 'Migrated Archives'. Archival Science, 18(3), 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-018-9292-9
  28. McKemmish, S. & Upward, F. (1991). Archival Document: A Submission to the Inquiry into Australia as an Information Society. Archives & Manuscript, 19(1), 17-31.
  29. McKemmish, S. (1994). Are Records Ever Actual?. The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives First Fifty Years. McKemmish, S. & Piggott, M. eds. Clayton: Ancora Press & Australian Archives.
  30. McKemmish, S. (1997). Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility. Available: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/conference_contribution/Yesterday_today_and_tomorrow_a_continuum_of_responsibility/4037433
  31. McKemmish, S. (1998). The Smoking Gun: Recordkeeping and Accountability. Available: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/conference_contribution/The_smoking_gun_recordkeeping_and_accountability/4037394
  32. McKemmish, S. (2001). Placing Records Continuum Theory and Practice. Archival Science, 1(4), 333-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438901
  33. McKemmish, S. (2005). Traces: Document, Record, Archive, Archives. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B. & Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
  34. McKemmish, S. (2017). Recordkeeping in the Continuum: An Australian Tradition. Research in the Archival Multiverse. Gilliland, J. A., McKemmish, S. & Lau, J. A. eds. Clayton: Monash University Publishing.
  35. McKemmish, S., Acland, G., Ward, N., & Reed, B. (1999). Describing Records in Context in the Continuum: The Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema. Archivaria, 48, 3-37.
  36. McKemmish, S., Faulkhead, S., & Russell, L. (2011). Distrust in the Archive: Reconciling Records. Archival Science, 11(3-4), 211-239.
  37. Nesmith, T. (2008). Re-exploring the Continuum, Rediscovering Archives. Archives & Manuscripts, 36(2), 34-53.
  38. Piggott, M. (1998). The History of Australian Record-keeping: A Framework for Research. The Australian Library Journal, 47(4), 343-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.1998.10755861
  39. Piggott, M. (2005a). Building Collective Memory Archives. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(1), 62-83.
  40. Piggott, M. (2005b). Archives and Memory. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B. & Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
  41. Piggott, M. (2012). Archives and Societal Provenance: Australian Essays. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
  42. Reed, B. (2005a). Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Imagining the Potential of Pluralised Recordkeeping. Available: https://www.records.com.au/pdf/Beyond_perceived_boundaries.pdf
  43. Reed, B. (2005b). Reading the Records Continuum: Interpretations and Explorations. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(1), 18-43.
  44. Reed, B. (2005c). Records. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B., & Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
  45. Schellenberg, T. R. (1956). Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. 이원영 옮김 (2002). 현대 기록학개론. 서울: 진리탐구.
  46. Upward, F. (1994). In Search of the Continuum: Ian Maclean's 'Australian Experience' Essays on Recordkeeping. Available: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/In_search_of_the_continuum_Ian_Maclean_s_Australian_Experience_Essays_on_Recordkeeping/4060014
  47. Upward, F. (1996). Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial Principles and Properties. Available: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/Structuring_the_records_continuum_-_part_one_postcustodial_principles_and_properties/4037445/1
  48. Upward, F. (2000). Modelling the Continuum as Paradigm Shift in Recordkeeping and Archiving Processes, and Beyond - A Personal Reflection. Records Management Journal, 10(3), 115-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007259
  49. Upward, F., McKemmish, S., & Reed, B. (2011). Archivists and Changing Social and Information Spaces. Archivaria, 72, 197-237.
  50. Wickman, D. (1999). What's New? Functional Analysis in Life Cycle and Continuum Environments. Archives & Manuscripts, 26(1), 114-127.
  51. Yusof, M. Z. & Chell, W. R. (2000). The Records Life Cycle: An Inadequate Concept for Technology-generated Records. Information Development, 16(3), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666004240413