DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical performance of class I cavities restored with bulk fill composite at a 1-year follow-up using the FDI criteria: a randomized clinical trial

  • Received : 2020.04.22
  • Accepted : 2020.07.06
  • Published : 2021.05.31

Abstract

Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the survival rate and clinical performance of class 1 composite restorations restored with the Filtek Bulk Fill composite material using either the bulk fill technique or the incremental technique at baseline (1 week) and at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients with at least 2 carious teeth were selected. Following randomization, one tooth was restored with the Filtek Bulk Fill composite using the incremental fill technique, and the other tooth was restored with the same material using the bulk fill technique. Patients were recalled for follow-up at baseline (1 week) and 3, 6, and 12 months and evaluated using the FDI criteria. Results: The data were analyzed using the McNemar χ2 test. No statistically significant differences were found between the scores of teeth restored with either technique. At baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up; there were no significant difference in the clinical status of both groups of restorations. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, using the bulk fill technique for restorations with the Filtek Bulk Fill material seems to be equally efficient to using the incremental fill technique.

Keywords

References

  1. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1639. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601
  2. Chesterman J, Jowett A, Gallacher A, Nixon P. Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review. Br Dent J 2017;222:337-344. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.214
  3. Bayraktar Y, Ercan E, Hamidi MM, Colak H. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites. J Investig Clin Dent 2017;8:e12210.
  4. Colak H, Tokay U, Uzgur R, Hamidi MM, Ercan E. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of one nano-hybrid and one high-viscosity bulk-fill composite restorative systems in class II cavities: 12 months results. Niger J Clin Pract 2017;20:822-831. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.212449
  5. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology. Dent Mater 2014;30:e245-e251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.028
  6. van Dijken JW, Sunnegardh-Gronberg K. A two-year clinical evaluation of a new calcium aluminate cement in class II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:235-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350310004575
  7. van Dijken JW. A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microfiller, and hybrid composite resin fillings. A 6-year follow-up study. Acta Odontol Scand 1986;44:357-367. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358609094346
  8. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:349-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8
  9. American Dental Association-Council on Scientific: American Dental Association program guidelines: products for dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Available from: http://www.ada.org (updated 2001 Jun). 
  10. Sadeghi M, Lynch CD, Shahamat N. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:532-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02073.x
  11. Faye B, Sarr M, Bane K, Aidara AW, Niang SO, Kane AW. One-year clinical evaluation of the bonding effectiveness of a one-step, self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesion therapy. Int J Dent 2015;2015:984065.
  12. de Andrade AK, Duarte RM, Medeiros e Silva FD, Batista AU, Lima KC, Pontual ML, Montes MA. 30-Month randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a nanofill and a nanohybrid composite. J Dent 2011;39:8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.09.005
  13. Campos EA, Ardu S, Lefever D, Jasse FF, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014;42:575-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.007
  14. Kwon TY, Bagheri R, Kim YK, Kim KH, Burrow MF. Cure mechanisms in materials for use in esthetic dentistry. J Investig Clin Dent 2012;3:3-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00114.x
  15. Abbas G, Fleming GJ, Harrington E, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent 2003;31:437-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00121-5
  16. Van Ende A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin. Dent Mater 2013;29:269-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.002
  17. Alrahlah A, Silikas N, Watts DC. Post-cure depth of cure of bulk fill dental resin-composites. Dent Mater 2014;30:149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.10.011
  18. Benetti AR, Havndrup-Pedersen C, Honore D, Pedersen MK, Pallesen U. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Oper Dent 2015;40:190-200. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-324-L
  19. Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJ. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent 2012;40:500-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.015
  20. Menees TS, Lin CP, Kojic DD, Burgess JO, Lawson NC. Depth of cure of bulk fill composites with monowave and polywave curing lights. Am J Dent 2015;28:357-361.
  21. Tantbirojn D, Pfeifer CS, Braga RR, Versluis A. Do low-shrink composites reduce polymerization shrinkage effects? J Dent Res 2011;90:596-601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510396217