Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제21권2호
  • /
  • Pages.125-136
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of near-fault earthquakes on a historical masonry arch bridge (Konjic Bridge)

  • Karalar, Memduh (Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Department of Civil Engineering) ;
  • Yesil, Mustafa (Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Department of Civil Engineering)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.27
  • 심사 : 2021.07.05
  • 발행 : 2021.08.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study, it is aimed to investigation the performance of historical arch bridge under near fault earthquakes with the finite element method (FEM) and to demonstrate the capability and performance estimation. For this purpose, Konjic Bridge constructed in the Bosnia and Herzegovina is selected. To investigated the behaviour of near fault earthquakes on Konjic Bridge, first, FEM of the Konjic Bridge is built and analyzed under various near fault using the program ANSYS. To build FEM, 647894 nodes and 215464 elements are used in ANSYS. Then, near-fault earthquakes are taken into accounted (Chi-Chi 1999, Imperial Valley 1979, Superstation Hill 1987, NorthRidge 1994, Cape Mend 1992, Kobe 1995). The maximum displacement values, principal stresses and elastic strain values are compared with the help of contour diagrams. As a result of these analyzes, it is seen that the arch of the historical masonry arch bridge has more effect on the structural behavior of the historical masonry arch bridge. Furthermore, it is obviously seen that under the near fault earthquakes, the tensile stresses, especially on the top, bottom and side of the large belt, reached the allowable tensile strength of the wall under the near fault earthquakes. There may also be a risk of damage due to these stresses.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Altunsik A.C., Kanbur B., Genc A.F. and Kalkan E. (2019), "Structural response of historical Masonry arch bridges under different arch curvature considering soil-structure interaction", Geomech., 18(2), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.18.2.141.
  2. ANSYS (1998), ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, Pensnsylvania.
  3. Armstrong, D.M., Sibbald, A., Fairfield, C.A. and Forde, M.C. (1995), "Modal analysis for masonry arch bridge spandrel wall separation identification", NDT E. Int., 28(6), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-8695(95)00048-8.
  4. Artar M., Coban K., Yurdakul, M., Can, O., Yilmaz, F. and Yildiz, M.B. (2019), "Investigation on seismic isolation retrofit of a historical masonry structure", Earthq. Struct., 16(4), 501-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.4.501.
  5. Aydia, A.C., Ozkaya, S.G. (2018), "The finite element analysis of collapse loads of single-spanned historic masonry arch bridges (Ordu, Sarpdere Bridge)", Eng. Fail. Anal., 84,131-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.11.002.
  6. Basaran, H., Demir, A., Ercan, E., Nohutcu, H., Hokelekli, E. and Kozanoglu, C. (2016), "Investigation of seismic safety of a masonry minaret using its dynamic characteristics", Earthq. Struct., 10(3), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.3.523.
  7. Bayraktar, A., Altunisik, A.C., Turker, T. and Sevim, B. (2007), "The model updating of historical masonry bridges using operational modal analysis method", Proceedings of the 1st National Conference Reinforcement and Transfer into the Future of Historical Structures, Ankara, Turkey, 429-440.
  8. Bensalem, A., Fairfield, C.A. and Sibbald, A. (1997), "Nondestructive evaluation of the dynamic response of a brickwork arch", ICE J. Struct. Build., 122(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1680/istbu.1997.29168.
  9. Bensalem, A., Fairfield, C.A. and Sibbald, A. (1998), "Damping effects on the NDT of soil backfilled arch bridges", J. British Institute NDT, 40(2), 107-116.
  10. Boothby, T.E. (1998), "Service load response of masonry arch bridges", J. Struct. Eng.. 124(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:1(17).
  11. Breccolottia, M., Severinib, L., Cavalagli, N., Bonfiglic, F. M. and Gusellad, V. (2018), "Rapid evaluation of in-plane seismic capacity of masonry arch bridges through limit analysis", Earthq. Struct., 15(5), 541-553. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.5.541.
  12. Brencich, A. and Sabia, D. (2008), "Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: The Tanaro Bridge", Construct. Build. Mater., 22(10), 2087-2099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.031
  13. Cakir, F. and Seker, B.S. (2015), "Structural performance of renovated masonry low bridge in Amasya, Turkey", Earthq. Struct., 8(6), 1387-1406. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.6.1387.
  14. Cakir, F., Ergen, Y.B., Uysal, H. and Dogangun, A. (2016), "Influence of modified intended use on the seismic behavior of historical himis structures", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 893-911. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.893.
  15. Diamanti, N., Giannopoulos, A. and Forde, M.C. (2008), "Numerical modelling and experimental verification of GPR to investigate ring separation in brick masonry arch bridges", NDT E. Int., 41(5), 354-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.01.006.
  16. Dogangun, A. and Sezen, H. (2012), "Seismic vulnerability and preservation of historical masonry monumental structures", Earthq. Struct., 3(1), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.1.083
  17. Fanning, P.J. and Boothby, T.E. (2001), "Three-dimensional modelling and full-scale testing of stone arch bridges", Comput. Struct., 79(29), 2645-2662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00109-2.
  18. Frunzio, G., Monaco, M. and Gesualdo, A. (2001), "3D FEM analysis of a roman arch bridge", Historic. Construct., 591-598.
  19. Halifeoglu, F.M., Halide, S. and Yilmaz, S. (2016), "Tarihi kurt koprusu (Mihrapli Kopru, Vezirkopru) restorasyonu proje ve uygulama calismalari", METU J, Faculty Architect., 30(2).
  20. Hatzigeorgiou, G.D., Beskos, D.E., Teodorakopoulos, D.D. and Sfakianaki, M. (1999), "Static and dynamic analysis of the Arta bridge by finite elements", Arch. Civil Eng., 2(1), 41-51.
  21. Kadhim, M.M.A. (2012), "Factors effect on the effective length in a double strap joint between steel plates and CFRP", Int. J. Advan. Appl. Sci., 1, 11-18.
  22. Kamil, J.A. Khan, I.A. and Nath, Y. (2011), "Numerical and experimental dynamic contact of rotating spur gear", Modern Appl. Sci., 5, 254-263. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v5n2p254.
  23. Karalar, M. and Yesil, M. (2020), "Investigation of different arch curvature heights of single-span masonry arch bridge under ground movements", 8th International Scientific Research Congress - Sci. Engineering (UBAK).
  24. Karalar, M. and Yesil, M. (2020), Effect of Near and Far-Fault Earthquakes on Historical Tokatli Bridge Constructed in Karabuk, Turkey, Int. Congress on Academic Research.
  25. Karalar, M., Padgett, J.E. and Dicleli, M. (2012), "Parametric analysis of optimum isolator properties for bridges susceptible to Near-Fault Ground Motions", Eng. Struct., 40, 276-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.023.
  26. Kramer, S.L. (1996), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  27. Makris, N. and Black, J.C. (2004), "Evaluation of peak ground velocity as a "Good" intensity measure for near-source ground motions", J. Eng. Mech., 130(9), 1032-1044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:9(1032).
  28. Makris, N. and Chang, S. (1998), "Effect of damping mechanisms on the response of seismically isolated structures", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
  29. Muvafik, M. (2014), "Field investigation and seismic analysis of a historical brick masonry minaret damaged during the Van earthquakes in 2011", Earthq. Struct., 6(5), 457-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.5.457.
  30. Page, J. (1993), Masonry Arch Bridges-A State of the Art Review, HMSO, London
  31. Pela, L., Aprile, A. and Benedetti, A. (2009), "Seismic assessment of masonry arch bridges", Eng. Struct., 31, 1777-1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.012.
  32. Preciado, A., Bartoli, G. and Budelmann, H. (2015), "Fundamental aspects on the seismic vulnerability of ancient masonry towers and retrofitting techniques", Earthq. Struct., 9(2), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.2.339.
  33. Rovithis, E.N and Pitilakis, K.D. (2016), "Seismic assessment and retrofitting measures of a historic stone masonry bridge", Earthq. Struct., 10(3), 645-667. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.3.645
  34. Sayin, E. (2016), "Nonlinear seismic response of a masonry arch bridge", Earthq. Struct., 10(2), 483-494. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.3.645.
  35. Sert, H., Partal, E., Demirci, H., Avsin, A. and Yilmaz, S. (2009), Tarihi Kopruler Proje ve Uygulama Ihaleleri, Karayollari Genel Mudurlugu Yayinlari, Ankara. 54 s.
  36. Sevim, B., Bayraktar, A., Altunisik, A.C., Atamturktur S. and Birinci F. (2011), "Assessment of nonlinear seismic performance of a restored historical arch bridge using ambient vibrations", Nonlinear Dyn., 63, 755-770. https://doi.org10.1007/s11071-010-9835-y.
  37. Toker, S. and Unay, A.I. (2004), "Mathematical modelling and finite element analysis of masonry arch bridges", J. Sci. Gazi Univ., 17(2),129-139.
  38. Ural, A. (2005), "Finite element analysis of historical arch bridge", Int. Earthq. Symposium Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey, 23, 408-413.
  39. Ural, A., Oruc, S., Dogangun, A. and Tuluk O.I., (2008), "Turkish historical arch bridges and their deteriorations and failures", Eng. Fail. Anal., 15, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.01.006
  40. Yazdizadeh, B. (2010), "Comparison of different plane models in finite element software in structural mechanics", Proceddings of the Yerevan State University, 3(5),44-50.

피인용 문헌

  1. Investigation on Seismic Behavior of Historical Tokatlı Bridge under Near-Fault Earthquakes vol.2021, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5596760