Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2021 Summer Issue Special: Introduction to JCEA

  • Published : 2021.08.19
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

Acknowledgement

As our shared stress on relationality should make clear, any accomplishment and contribution in these domains is the work of many, many hands. Beyond the countless colleagues who, like Soraj Hongladarom, have contributed to my efforts to develop a pros hen pluralism over the past two decades, here I wish to thank first of all the anonymous reviewers of the articles whose first readings and constructive criticisms helped the authors all the better unfold their best substance, insights, and arguments. In turn, I am deeply grateful to the authors. It is the highest and most humbling honor in philosophy to have one's work taken up in the ways on display here. In particular, as the Germans say: if you don't criticize me, you're not taking me seriously. I am most profoundly thankful for the criticisms developed here, along with those of Anne Boily - and, even better, of course, for the substantive improvements, expansions, transformations, and new versions of pluralism offered here and by Anne. All of these have helped overcome problems and limitations I've been aware of in some way or another for some time, but never able to adequately come to grips with. Last but certainly not least: I can only express my greatest gratitude to the Editor-in-Chief, Prof. Dr. Han Woo Park, and Associate Editor Leslie Tkach-Kawasaki for initially inviting me to serve as an editor of such a special issue. Along with Managing Editor Felicia Istad, I have very much appreciated your constant advice, encouragement, and support across the demanding processes and unexpected difficulties that cropped up in developing the issue.

References

  1. Ames, R.T. & Rosemont, Jr., H. (1998). The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine.
  2. Boily, Anne. (2021). Tensions en ethique de l'intelligence artificielle (IA): Un guide hermeneutique pour les decideurs politiques [Tensions in the ethics of artificial intelligence (AI): A hermeneutical guide for policy makers]. PhD thesis, Department of Political Science, Universite de Montreal.
  3. Bynum, T. W. (2006). Flourishing ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(4), 157-173. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9107-1.
  4. Bynum, T.W. & Kantar, N. (forthcoming). Global ethics for the digital age - flourishing ethics. Journal of Communication, Information and Ethics in Society, 19(3).
  5. Capurro, R. (1990). Towards an information ecology. In I. Wormell (Ed.), Information quality, definitions and dimensions (pp. 122-139). Taylor Graham, London.
  6. Chan, J. (2003). Confucian Attitudes Towards Ethical Pluralism. In R. Madsen and T.B. Strong (Eds.), The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World (pp. 129-153). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  7. Elberfeld, R. (2002). Resonanz als Grundmotiv ostasiatischer Ethik [Resonance as a Fundamental Motif of East Asian Ethics]. in R. Elberfeld and G. Wohlfart (Eds.), Komparative Ethik: Das gute Leben zwischen den Kulturen [Comparative Ethics: The Good Life between Cultures] (pp. 131-141). Cologne: Edition Chora.
  8. Ess, C. (2002). Cultures in Collision: Philosophical Lessons from Computer-Mediated Communication. Metaphilosophy, 33(1/2), 229-253. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24439325 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00226
  9. Ess, C. (2006). Ethical pluralism and global information ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(4), 215-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9113-3
  10. Ess, C. (2017). What's "culture" got to do with it? A (personal) review of CATaC (cultural attitudes towards technology and communication), 1998-2014, In G. Goggin & M. McLelland (Eds.), Routledge companion to global internet histories (pp. 34-48). London: Routledge.
  11. Ess, C. (2020a). Digital Media Ethics, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity.
  12. Ess, C. (2020b). Interpretative Pros Hen Pluralism: from Computer-Mediated Colonization to a Pluralistic Intercultural Digital Ethics. Philosophy and Technology, 33, 551-569. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00412-9
  13. Ess, C. (2021). Towards an Existential and Emancipatory Ethic of Technology. In Vallor, S. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Technology. Online Publication Date: Jan 2021. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190851187.013.35
  14. Floridi, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford University Press.
  15. franzke, a.s., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., Ess, C. and the Association of Internet Researchers (2020), Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
  16. Higgins, K. M. (2018). Performance in Confucian role ethics. In J. Behuniak (Ed.), Appreciating the Chinese difference: Engaging Roger T. Ames on methods, issues, and roles (pp. 213-228). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  17. Hildebrandt, M. (2015) Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law: Novel Entanglements of Law and Technology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  18. Hongladarom, S. (1999). Global culture, local cultures and the Internet: The Thai example. AI & Society, 13(4), 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205985
  19. Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting. Oxford: OUP.
  20. Wong, P-H. (2020). Cultural Differences as Excuses? Human Rights and Cultural Values in Global Ethics and Governance of AI. Philosophy & Technology, 33, 705-715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00413-8