Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제79권3호
  • /
  • Pages.327-336
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Output-only structural damage detection under multiple unknown white noise excitations

  • Ni, Pinghe (Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology) ;
  • Wang, Xiaojuan (Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology) ;
  • Zhou, Hongyuan (Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.09
  • 심사 : 2021.06.11
  • 발행 : 2021.08.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Most of the existing output-only damage detection methods require the number of sensors should be larger than the number of unknown excitation force, and the force location should be available. This paper presents a novel output-only damage detection method without these requirements. The proposed method is based on the correlation function of acceleration responses. When the structure is under white noise excitations (or ambient excitations), the correlation function of acceleration responses can be treated as free vibration responses with unknown initial conditions. The unknown structural parameters and initial conditions can be simultaneously identified by minimizing the difference between the measured and calculated correlation functions. The unknown initial conditions are identified with state space method and the unknown structural parameters are updated with sensitivity method. Numerical studies of a 2D truss and a five-bay 3D frame structure are conducted to demonstrate the accuracy, effectiveness, and robustness of the proposed method. Experimental studies on an eight-floor steel frame are further carried out. Results show that the proposed method is not only insensitive to environmental noise but also applicable when the number of sensors is less than that of unknown excitations. Also, the proposed method can be used for damage detection when the force location is unknown.

키워드

과제정보

The presented work was supported Beijing Municipal Education Commission Projects (KM201810005019, KM202110005020), a research grant from the Niche Area Project Funding of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project No.1-BB6F), and the research project of Beijing Natural Science Foundation (grant number 8184063).

참고문헌

  1. Bendat, J.S. and Piersol, A.G. (2011), Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, Vol. 729, John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Bernal, D. (2013), "Kalman filter damage detection in the presence of changing process and measurement noise", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 39(1-2), 361-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.02.012.
  3. Caicedo, J.M., Dyke, S.J. and Johnson, E.A. (2004), "Natural excitation technique and eigensystem realization algorithm for phase I of the IASC-ASCE benchmark problem: Simulated data", J. Eng. Mech., 130(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:1(49).
  4. Chu, S.Y. and Lo, S.C. (2011), "Application of the on-line recursive least-squares method to perform structural damage assessment", Struct. Control Hlth. Monit., 18(3), 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.362.
  5. Ghiasi, R., Torkzadeh, P. and Noori, M. (2016), "A machinelearning approach for structural damage detection using least square support vector machine based on a new combinational kernel function", Struct. Hlth. Monit., 15(3), 302-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921716639587.
  6. Gobbato, M., Kosmatka, J.B. and Conte, J.P. (2014), "A recursive Bayesian approach for fatigue damage prognosis: An experimental validation at the reliability component level", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 45(2), 448-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.10.014.
  7. Hamidian, D., Salajegheh, E. and Salajegheh, J. (2018), "Damage detection technique for irregular continuum structures using wavelet transform and fuzzy inference system optimized by particle swarm optimization", Struct. Eng. Mech., 67, 457-464. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.67.5.457.
  8. Hwang, H. and Kim, C. (2004), "Damage detection in structures using a few frequency response measurements", J. Sound Vib., 270(1-2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00190-1.
  9. James, G., Carne, T.G. and Lauffer, J.P. (1995), "The natural excitation technique (NExT) for modal parameter extraction from operating structures", Modal Anal., Int. J. Anal. Exper. Modal Anal., 10(4), 260.
  10. Koh, C., Chen, Y. and Liaw, C.Y. (2003), "A hybrid computational strategy for identification of structural parameters", Comput. Struct., 81(2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00344-9.
  11. Lam, H.F., Zhang, F.L., Ni, Y.C. and Hu, J. (2017), "Operational modal identification of a boat-shaped building by a Bayesian approach", Eng. Struct., 138, 381-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.003.
  12. Li, J. and Hao, H. (2014), "Substructure damage identification based on wavelet-domain response reconstruction", Struct. Hlth. Monit., 13(4), 389-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921714532991.
  13. Li, X., Wang, L. and Law, S. (2013), "Damage detection for structures under ambient vibration via covariance of covariance matrix and consistent regularization", Adv. Struct. Eng., 16(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.1.77.
  14. Maity, D. and Tripathy, R.R. (2005), "Damage assessment of structures from changes in natural frequencies using genetic algorithm", Struct. Eng. Mech., 19(1), 21-42. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.19.1.021.
  15. Malekjafarian, A. and OBrien, E.J. (2014), "Identification of bridge mode shapes using short time frequency domain decomposition of the responses measured in a passing vehicle", Eng. Struct., 81, 386-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.007.
  16. Mortazavi, A., Togan, V. and Nuhoglu, A. (2017), "An integrated particle swarm optimizer for optimization of truss structures with discrete variables", Struct. Eng. Mech., 61(3), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.61.3.359.
  17. Ni, P., Xia, Y., Law, S.S. and Zhu, S. (2014), "Structural damage detection using auto/cross-correlation functions under multiple unknown excitations", Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn., 14(05), 1440006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455414400069.
  18. Pappa, R.S., Elliott, K.B. and Schenk, A. (1993), "Consistentmode indicator for the eigensystem realization algorithm", J. Guid. Control Dyn., 16(5), 852-858. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21092.
  19. Peeters, B. and De Roeck, G. (1999), "Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 13(6), 855-878. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1999.1249.
  20. Seyedpoor, S. (2012), "A two stage method for structural damage detection using a modal strain energy based index and particle swarm optimization", Int. J. Nonlin. Mech., 47(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.07.011.
  21. Siringoringo, D.M. and Fujino, Y. (2008), "System identification of suspension bridge from ambient vibration response", Eng. Struct., 30(2), 462-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.03.004.
  22. Tikhonov, A.N., Goncharsky, A., Stepanov, V. and Yagola, A.G. (1995), Numerical Methods For The Solution Of Ill-Posed Problems, Springer Science & Business Media.
  23. Wang, L., Yang, Z. and Waters, T. (2010), "Structural damage detection using cross correlation functions of vibration response", J. Sound Vib., 329(24), 5070-5086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.06.020.
  24. Zhang, M., Schmidt, R. and Markert, B. (2015), "Structural damage detection using auto correlation functions of vibration response under sinusoidal excitation", J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 628(1), 012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/628/1/012029.