Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제40권3호
  • /
  • Pages.435-450
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Self-centering BRBs with composite tendons in series: Tests and structural analyses

  • Xie, Qin (Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration: Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of China Earthquake Administration) ;
  • Zhou, Zhen (Southeast University, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education) ;
  • Zhang, Lingxin (Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration: Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of China Earthquake Administration)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.29
  • 심사 : 2021.06.08
  • 발행 : 2021.08.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The self-centering system and yielding energy dissipation system are two main parts of self-centering buckling-restrained braces (SC-BRBs), which have important influences on brace performance. To improve the performance of the two parts, an SC-BRB with composite tendons in series (SC-BRB-CTS) is proposed by introducing a self-centering system in series that can improve the deformation capability of the brace, and the yielding energy dissipation system made of low-yield steel LYP160 with a strong energy dissipation capacity is adopted. The performance of the braces is studied by quasi-static tests, and the influence of the self-centering system in series and low-yield steel on the seismic performance of the structure is determined by nonlinear dynamic analyses and fragility analyses. The results show that the deformation capacity of the SC-BRB-CTS is approximately 44% higher than that of a traditional SC-BRB, and the collapse resistance of the structure is improved by avoiding or delaying tendon fracture. The use of LYP160 steel core plates can substantially improve the energy dissipation capacity and post-yielding bearing capacity of the brace, which is beneficial for reducing the seismic response of the structure.

키워드

과제정보

The research described in this paper was financially supported by "Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (Grand No. 2020EEEVL0407)", "The Science and Technology Department of Guizhou Province ([2020]1Y249)", "China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M690621)", "High-level Talent Research Funding Project of Guizhou Institute of Technology (XJGC20190907)", "Academic Cultivation and Innovative Exploration Project of Guizhou Institute of Technology (GZLGXM-10)". The supports are gratefully acknowledged.

참고문헌

  1. AISC (2010), "Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings", American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, IL.
  2. ASCE (2010), "Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures", SEI/ASCE standard No. 7-10, ASCE, Reston, Va.
  3. ASCE-41 (2006), "Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings", American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
  4. ATC. (2009) "Guidelines for Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings ATC-58 50% Draft", Rep. No. 58, Applied Technology Council, Washington, DC.
  5. Chen, C.C., Chen, S.Y. and Liaw, J.J. (2001), "Application of low yield strength steel on controlled plastification ductile concentrically braced frames", Can. J. Civil Eng., 28(5), 823-836. https://doi.org/10.1139/l01-044.
  6. Chi, P., Guo, T., Peng, Y., Cao, D. and Dong, J. (2018), "Development of a self-centering tension-only brace for seismic protection of frame structures", Steel Compos. Struct., 26(5), 573-582. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.26.5.573.
  7. Chou, C.C., Wu, T.H., Beato, A.R.O., Chung, P.T. and Chen, Y.C. (2016a), "Seismic design and tests of a full-scale one-story onebay steel frame with a dual-core self-centering brace", Eng. Struct., 111, 435-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.007.
  8. Chou, C.C., Tsai, W.J. and Chung, P.T. (2016b), "Development and validation tests of a dual-core self-centering sandwiched buckling-restrained brace (SC-SBRB) for seismic resistance", Eng. Struct., 121, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.015.
  9. Christopoulos, C., Tremblay, R., Kim, H.J. and Lacerte, M. (2008), "Selfcentering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures: Development and validation", J. Struct. Eng., 134(1), 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(96).
  10. Dyke, S.J. (2010), "2020 Vision for Earthquake Engineering Research: Report on an OpenSpace Technology Workshop on the Future of Earthquake Engineering", http://nees.org/resources/1636.
  11. Erochko, J., Christopoulos, C. and Tremblay, R. (2015), "Design, testing, and detailed component modeling of a high-capacity self-centering energy-dissipative brace", J. Struct. Eng., 141(8), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001166.
  12. Hossain, M.R., Ashraf, M., and Padgett, J.E. (2013), "Risk-based seismic performance assessment of Yielding Shear Panel Device", Eng. Struct., 56, 1570-1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.032.
  13. Hsiao, P.C., Lehman, D.E. and Roeder, C.W. (2013), "Evaluation of the response modification coefficient and collapse potential of special concentrically braced frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 42(10), 1547-1564. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2286.
  14. Huang, Z., Li, Z.J. and Ding, T. (2013), "Experimental investigation of BRB with transverse rib restraints", J. Southeast Univ., (English Edition), 29(1), 62-65.
  15. Jia, L.J., Ge, H., Maruyama, R. and Shinohara, K. (2017), "Development of a novel high-performance all-steel fish-bone shaped buckling-restrained brace", Eng. Struct., 138, 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.006.
  16. Maffei, J., Telleen, K. and Nakayama, Y. (2008), "Probability-Based Seismic Assessment of Buildings, Considering Post-Earthquake Safety", Earthq. Spectra, 24(3), 667-699. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2950066.
  17. McCormick, J., Aburano, H., Ikenaga, M. and Nakashima, M. (2008), "Permissible Residual Deformation Levels for Building Structures Considering Both Safety and Human Elements", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China. Paper No. 05-06-0071.
  18. Miller, D.J., Fahnestock, L.A. and Eatherton, M.R. (2012), "Development and experimental validation of a nickel-titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace", Eng. Struct., 40, 288-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.037.
  19. Sabelli, R., Mahin, S. and Chang, C. (2003), "Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 25(5), 655-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00175-X.
  20. Somerville, P.G. (1997), "Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project", Report no. SAC/DB-97/04, Sacramento, CA.
  21. Wada, A., Towhata, I., Tamura, K. and Zhe, Q. (2018). "A complete introduction to the SCJ proposal and its commentary on the development of seismically resilient cities", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 17(4), 677-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0468-3.
  22. Wang, J., Shi, Y. and Yan, H. (2013), "Experimental study on the seismic behavior of all-steel buckling-restrained brace with low yield point", China Civil Eng. J., 46(10), 9-16 (in Chinese).
  23. Wang, H., Nie, X. and Pan, P. (2017a), "Development of a self-centering buckling restrained brace using cross-anchored prestressed steel strands", J. Constr. Steel Res., 138, 621-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.07.017.
  24. Wang, M, Qian, F. and Yang, W. (2017b), "Constitutive behavior of low yield point steel LYP160", J. Build. Struct., 38(2), 26-39 (in Chinese).
  25. Xie, Q., Zhou, Z., Huang, J.H. and Meng, S.P. (2016), "Influence of tube length tolerance on seismic responses of multi-storey buildings with dual-tube self-centering buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 116(1), 26-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.023.
  26. Xie, Q., Zhou, Z. and Meng, S.P. (2020). "Behaviour of BFRP tendon systems under cyclic loading and its influence on the dual-tube SC-BRB hysteretic performance", Constr. Build. Mater., 259, 120388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120388.
  27. Xu, L.H., Fan, X.W., Lu, D.C. and Li, Z.X. (2016), "Hysteretic behavior studies of self-centering energy dissipation bracing system", Steel Compos. Struct., 20(6), 1205-1219. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.6.1205.
  28. Yang, C.S.W., DesRoches, R. and Leon, R.T. (2010), "Design and analysis of braced frames with shape memory alloy and energy-absorbing hybrid devices", Eng. Struct., 32(2), 498-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.10.011.
  29. Zhou, Z., He, X.T., Wu, J., Wang, C.L. and Meng, S.P. (2014), "Development of a novel self-centering buckling-restrained braces with BFRP composite tendons", Steel Compos. Struct., 16(5), 491-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.5.491.
  30. Zhou, Z., Xie, Q., Lei, X.C., He, X.T. and Meng, S.P. (2015), "Experimental investigation of the hysteretic performance of dual-tube self-centering buckling-restrained braces with composite tendons", J. Compos. Constr., 19(6), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000565.
  31. Zhu, S.Y. and Zhang Y.F. (2008), "Seismic analysis of concentrically braced frame systems with self-centering friction damping braces", J. Struct. Eng., 134(1), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(121).