DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Flipped Learning: Strategies and Technologies in Higher Education

  • Received : 2021.07.05
  • Published : 2021.07.30

Abstract

Flipped learning is necessary for modern education but quite difficult to implement. In pedagogical science, the question remains to what extent the practical work of the teacher in combination with the technologies of flipped learning will improve the quality of higher education. The aim of this article is to study the effectiveness and feasibility of using flipped learning technologies, assessing their perception by students (advantages and problems), identified an algorithm for introducing flipped learning technology in higher education institutions. Research methods. The main method is an experiment. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the study was conducted using a questionnaire and observation method. Statistical methods were used to evaluate the results of the experiment. The research hypothesis is that flipped learning allows the teacher to spend more time on an individual approach, to understand the real needs of students, and provide effective feedback, thereby improving the quality of learning and motivation of students, especially while studying complex material. The results of the study are to prove the effectiveness of the technology of flipped education in the study of complex disciplines, courses, topics. The use of flipped learning strategies improves the self-regulation of the educational process, group work skills, improves students' ability to learn, overcome difficulties. The technology of flipped learning in the presence of modern technical means and constant work on improving the level of digital literacy is an effective means for students to master complex topics and problematic issues that require additional consideration and discussion. The perspective of further research is the consideration of integrated approaches to the application of flipped learning technologies to the principles of STEAM-education, multilingual and multicultural programs, etc. It is also worth continuing to develop a set of methods aimed at enhancing the student's learning activities, the formation of group work skills, direct participation in creating the foundations of higher education.

Keywords

References

  1. Carr, R., Palmer, S., Hagel, P. (2015). Active learning: The importance of developing a comprehensive measure. Active Learning in Higher Education, vol.16 (3), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415589529
  2. Chism, N., Douglas, E., Hilson, W.J., 2010. Qualitative research basics: A guide for engineering educators. Retrieved from URL: http://crlte.engin.umich.edu/wpcontent/uploads/sites/7/2013/06
  3. Cisco, J. (2020). Embracing Difficulty across the Disciplines: The Difficulty Paper as a Tool for Building Disciplinary Literacy. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, vol. 8, no. 2, 73-89. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.6.
  4. Clark, R., Kaw, A., Lou, Y.; Scott, A., Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2018). Evaluating Blended and Flipped Instruction in Numerical Methods at Multiple Engineering Schools, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 12, no. 1, article 11. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2018.12011
  5. Damian, S. I., Iliescu, D. B., Rohozneanu, A., Glodeanu, A., Diac, M., David, S., & Hunea, I. (2017). The Role of Educational Measures for Juvenile Offenders in Forensic Psychiatry. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, vol. 9(3), 140-155. https://doi:10.18662/rrem/2017.0903.09.
  6. Fung, Ch. (2020). How Does Flipping Classroom Foster the STEM Education: A Case Study of the FPD Model. Tech Know Learn, vol. 25, 479-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09443-9
  7. Hovland, I. (2019). Bringing Reading into the Classroom: Using Active Learning to Practice the Invisible Skill. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 3, 512-23. Retrieved from URL: http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE3467.pdf.
  8. Jensen, J., Kummer, T., & Godoy, P. (2015). Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, vol. 14, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0129
  9. Jones, J. F. (1999), From Silence to Talk: Cross-Cultural Ideas on Students Participation in Academic Group Discussion. English for Specific Purposes, vol.18, Issue 3, 243-259 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00059-8
  10. Ivanova, I., Mosenkis, I., & Strokal, O. (2020). Modern media pedagogy: Ways of forming public journalism in Ukraine. Asia Life Sciences, 22, Issue 2, 357-370
  11. Khan Academy (2020) Retrieved from URL: https://ru.khanacademy.org/
  12. Kiki-Papadakis, K. & Chaimala, F. (2016). The Embedment of Responsible Research and Innovation Aspects in European Science Curricula. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, vol. 8(2), 71-87. Retrieved from URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/rrem/2016.0802.06
  13. Ko, J., Sammons P., Bakkum, L. (2013) Effective Teaching: a review of research and evidence. CfBT Education Trust. Retrieved from URL: http://cdn.cfbt.com/~/media/cfbtcorporate/files/research/2013/reffective-teaching-2013.pdf
  14. Leicht, R., Zappe, S., Litzinger, T., Messner, J. (2012). Employing the classroom flip to move "lecture" out of the classroom. Journal of Applications and Practices in Engineering Education, 3(1), 19-31.
  15. Lesley University, 2021. An Introduction to Flipped Learning. Retrieved from URL: https://lesley.edu/article/an-introduction-to-flipped-learning
  16. Love, B., Hodge,A., Grandgenett, N., & Swift,A. (2014). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 45(3), 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582
  17. Mason, G., Shuman, T., Cook, K. (2013). Inverting (flipping) classrooms - advantages and challenges. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
  18. Mason, R. (2006). Learning technologies for adult continuing education. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 121-133. doi.org/10.1080/01580370600751039
  19. Mastmeyer, A. (2020). Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Transforming to Flipped-Classroom from Instruction Teaching using Micro Feedback Loops. Manuscript Work in Progress, 1-42. Retrieved from URL: https:// doi:10.5281/zenodo.4000357
  20. Miller-Young, J., & Yeo, M. (2015). Conceptualizing and communicating SoTL: A framework for the field. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, vol. 3(2), 37-53. https://doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.3.2.37
  21. Rababah, I. (2020). The Reality of Using Modern Teaching Methods in Teaching Arabic for Speakers of other Languages from Teachers' Perspective. https://doi.org/10.25255/jss.2020.9.1.58.94
  22. Synorub, H., Medynska, O. (2019). Development of information culture of students of humanitarian specialities. Information Technologies and Learning Tools. 2019, vol. 72, no. 4, 152-167. https:// doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v72i4.2922
  23. Weimer, M. (2016, February 17). Weighing the evidence of new instructional policies, practices, and behaviors. Retrieved from URL: http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-professorblog/weighing-the-evidence-of-new-instructional-policiespractices-and-behaviors/.
  24. Weimer, M. (2016, March 9). Active learning: In need of deeper exploration. Retrieved from URL: http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-professorblog/active-learn-ing-inneed-of-deeper-exploration/.
  25. Wieman, C. (2014). Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111(23), 8319-8320. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407304111