한국건설관리학회논문집 (Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management)

  • 제22권4호
  • /
  • Pages.20-28
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2005-6095(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2465-9703(eISSN)
한국건설관리학회 (Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

시공책임형 CM의 국내 공공부문 도입을 위한 제도적 기반 수립 연구

Institutional Research for the Introduction of Construction Management at Risk in the Public Sector

  • 박지호 (아주대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김경래 (아주대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 배병윤 (한국건설기술연구원 건설정책연구소)
  • Park, Jiho (Department of Architectural Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Kim, Kyungrai (Department of Architectural Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Bae, Byungyun (Department of Construction Policy Research, KICT)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.18
  • 심사 : 2021.05.28
  • 발행 : 2021.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

국내 건설산업은 시공자 중심의 일방적인 생산방식에서 발주자와 시공자의 협업이 가능한 생산방식으로 변화하는 과정에 있다. 발주 방식에 따라 입·낙찰 방식, 계약 방식, 그리고 발주자의 사업 관여 정도도 달라질 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 국내 환경에 적합한 '시공책임형 건설사업관리' 도입을 위해서 국·내외 제도 분석과 입·낙찰 프로세스 분석, 계약이행 및 관리 분석, 사후관리 분석을 하고, 법제화를 위한 관련 법령 조문화와 제도의 효율적 운영을 위한 방안을 제시하고자 국·내외 시공책임형 건설사업관리의 제도 및 사례분석을 실시하였다. 건설산업기본법에 정의된 '시공책임형 건설사업관리'는 Pre-Con 업무를 수행하는 용역계약인 본 계약 이전 계약과 건설사업관리 및 공사계약인 본 계약으로 구분된다. 그러므로 '시공책임형 건설사업관리'는 해외의 사례와 같이 낙찰제도가 아니라 발주 방식의 하나로 보아야 하며, 도입을 위해서 설계/시공 일괄입찰, 기술제안 입찰과 동등한 입찰제도로서의 법제화가 필요하다. 국내 환경에 적합한 '시공책임형 건설사업관리' 도입을 위해서 국·내외 제도 분석과 입·낙찰 프로세스 분석, 계약이행 및 관리분석, 사후관리 분석을 하고, 법제화를 위한 관련 법령 조문의 개정과 제도의 효율적인 운영을 위한 방법을 본 제도의 본래 장점은 유지하면서 국내 시장에서 적용이 가능하도록 제시하였다.

The Domestic Construction Industry is in the process of changing from a one-sided production method centered on the contractor to a production method in which the order and the contractor can collaborate. Depending on the delivery method, the bid/success method, the contract method, and the degree of business involvement of the order may also vary. In this thesis, in order to introduce 'Construction Management at Risk' suitable for the domestic environment, domestic and foreign institutional analysis, bid process analysis, contract fulfillment and management analysis, post management analysis, and related laws and regulations for legalization In order to suggest a plan for the efficient operation of the system, a system and case analysis of domestic and international construction responsibility type construction project management was conducted. 'Construction Responsible Construction Project Management' defined in the Framework Act on the Construction Industry is divided into the main contract transfer contract, which is a service contract performing pre-con work, and the main contract, which is construction project management and construction contract. Therefore 'Construction Management at Risk' should be regarded as one of the ordering methods rather than a successful bid system, as in the case of overseas, and legalization as a bidding system equivalent to design/construction batch bid and technology proposal is necessary for introduction. In order to introduce 'Construction Management at Risk' suitable for the domestic environment, domestic and foreign institutional analysis, bidding process analysis, contract fulfillment and management analysis, and follow-up management analysis are conducted. A method for efficient operation was suggested so that it can be applied in the domestic market while maintaining the original merits of this system.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bill Cushist (2017). Statement of Work for Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Service.
  2. Colorado Department of Transportation (2015). (CMGC) Construction Manager/General Contractor.
  3. FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION (2005). "General Services Adminstration Department of Defense National Aeronautics And Space Administration." The United States Government.
  4. General Services Administration (2014). Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service, GSA P-100 Version 1.0.
  5. GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL REPORTING MANUAL (2017). The Government Financial Reporting Manual, RIBA, 18.
  6. GSA 2630 (2014). ARCHITECT-ENGINEER COST ESTIMATE, General Services Administration.
  7. GSA Form527 (2018). CONTRACTOR'S QUALIFICATIONS AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
  8. Kim, K.R. (2008). "Importance of CM at Risk for Advancement of Construction Industry Structure." Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 9(3), pp. 7-9.
  9. Kim, K.H., and Kim, K.R. (2014) "A Model for Predicting Management Costs of the Multiple Prime Contract", Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM,15(2), pp. 44
  10. Kim, U.Y., and Park, H.T. (2016). "A plan to introduce CM at Risk as an ordering method for public works." Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea, pp. 1-34.
  11. Laura Shadix (2016). Statement of Work for Construction Manager as agent (CMa) Contract, Greenville, SC New Courthouse Construction Solicitation, Number: GS-04-P-16-BV-C-7006.
  12. National Association of State Facilities Administrators (2007). CM/GC Guidelines FOR PUBLIC OWNERS.
  13. P-100 (2017). "Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service." General Services Administration, Washington, DC 20405, p. 16.
  14. P-120 (2007). "Project estimating requirements for the public buildings service." GSA Public Buildings Service.
  15. Park, M.S., Han, Y.J., Lee, H.S., and Kim, W.Y. (2010). "Development of Design Process Management Model using Dependency Structure Matrix for Constructability." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 11(5), pp. 65-74. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2010.11.5.65
  16. PBS-PQ250 (1992). Value Engineering Program Guide for Design and Construction, U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Service.
  17. Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO (2014). "Using Two Stage Open Book and Supply Chain Collaboration." PROJECT PROCUREMENT AND DELIVERY GUIDANCE.
  18. Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO (2014). PROJECT PROCUREMENT AND DELIVERY GUIDANCE Using Two Stage Open Book and Supply Chain Collaboration.
  19. Swindale Rhodes (2017). "Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) Contract for the New Greenville." South Carolina Federal Courthouse Project.
  20. Thomson Reuters (2011). "Deciding on the appropriate JCT contract" 2011-11.
  21. Thomson Reuters (2016)0 "Deciding on the appropriate JCT contract" 2016-05.
  22. United States Government Accountability Office (2009). GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide, GAO-09-3SP.
  23. United States Government Accountability Office (2015). Schedule Assessment Guide, GAO-16-89G.