Acknowledgement
이 논문은 2017년도 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단-차세대정보컴퓨팅기술개발사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2017M3C4A7083281).
References
- Cho NH (2004). Acceptance and development of the theory of semantic change, Linguistics, 43, 461-485.
- Choi TH, Choi YS, and Shin SM (2009). A study on the relationship between player characteristic factors and competitive factors of tennis grand slams competition using canonical correlation biplot and procrustes analysis, Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 22, 855-864. https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2009.22.4.855
- Davies M (2010). The Corpus of Historical American English: COHA, BYE, Brigham Young University.
- Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Furnas GW, Landauer TK, and Harshman R (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9
- Golub GH and Reinsch C (1970). Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions, Umerische Mathematik, 14, 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02163027
- Hamilton WL, Leskovec J, and Jurafsky D (2016). Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Change.
- Harris ZS (1954). Distributional structure, Word, 10, 146-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520
- Kim Y, Chiu YI, Hanaki K, Hegde D, and Petrov S (2014). Temporal Analysis of Language through Neural Language Models.
- Klingenberg CP (2015). Analyzing fluctuating asymmetry with geometric morphometrics: concepts, methods, and applications, Symmetry, 7, 843-934. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym7020843
- Kulkarni V, Al-Rfou R, Perozzi B, and Skiena S (2015). Statistically significant detection of linguistic change. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, 625-635.
- Lin Y, Michel JB, Aiden EL, Orwant J, Brockman W, and Petrov S (2012). Syntactic annotations for the google books ngram corpus. In Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations, 169-174.
- Matveeva I, Levow G, Farahat A, and Royer C (2007). Term representation with generalized latent semantic analysis, Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing IV: Selected Papers from RANLP 2005. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.292.08.
- Mikolov T, Le QV, and Sutskever I (2013). Exploiting Similarities among Languages for Machine Translation.
- Naptali W, Tsuchiya M, and Nakagawa S (2009). Word co-occurrence matrix and context dependent class in lsa based language model for speech recognition, International Journal of Computers, 1.
- Park S, Byun J, Baek S, Cho Y, and Oh A (2018). Subword-level Word Vector Representations for Korean. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1, 2429-2438.
- Sahlgren M (2008). The distributional hypothesis, Italian Journal of Disability Studies, 20, 33-53.
- Schonemann PH (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289451
- Yoon P (2013). Korean semantic lecture, Youkrack.