융합정보논문지 (Journal of Convergence for Information Technology)

중소기업융합학회 (Convergence Society for SMB)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

개인적 특성이 DIY체험과 지속의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

A Study on the Influence of Personal Characteristics on DIY Experience and Intention to Continue

  • 정윤희 (건국대학교 글로컬캠퍼스 경영학전공)
  • Jeong, Yun-Hee (Department of Business Administration, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2021.03.26
  • 심사 : 2021.07.20
  • 발행 : 2021.07.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 DIY에 대한 소비자의 관심이 증가하고 관련 산업이 발달하면서, DIY에 대한 이론적 관심도 점차 증가하고 있지만 깊이 있는 연구는 부족한 편이다. 특히 DIY를 마케팅적 관점에서 접근한 연구가 부족하며 더욱이 DIY 참여하는 개인들의 특성이 주는 영향은 거의 연구되지 않았다. 따라서 본 연구는 개인특성이 DIY 체험과 지속의도에 주는 영향을 살펴봄으로써 이러한 기존 연구의 한계점을 보완하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. DIY 체험에 영향을 주는 개인특성으로서 감성강도, 인지욕구, 자기효능감을 제안하고, 이들 변수가 감각, 감정, 인지, 행동, 관계 등의 DIY체험에 주는 영향, DIY체험이 DIY 지속의도에 미치는 영향을 가정하였다. 다양한 분야의 DIY를 체험한 소비자를 대상으로 231부의 데이터를 분석하였으며, 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 예상대로, 감성강도는 감각체험과 감정체험에 인지욕구는 인지체험, 자기효능감은 행동체험, 관계체험에 긍정적 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났으며, 모든 DIY 체험은 지속의도에 긍정적 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 DIY 소비자 개인특성의 영향을 확인하고 포괄적인 체험의 관점에서 DIY에 접근함으로써 기존 연구의 한계점을 보완하고, 전략적 시사점을 제공하고 있다.

Recently, as consumer interest in DIY increases and the industry develops, theoretical interest in DIY is also gradually increasing, but in-depth research has hardly been conducted. In particular, research on DIY marketing from a marketing perspective is lacking, and moreover, the influence of the characteristics of individuals participating in DIY has hardly been studied. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to supplement the limitations of these existing studies by examining the effect of individual characteristics on DIY experience and intention to continue. We propose affect intensity, need for cognition, and self-efficacy as personal characteristics that influence DIY experience. In addition, we hypothesized the effects of these variables on the DIY experience such as sense, feel, think, act, relate, and the effect of the DIY experience on intention to continue DIY. We analyzed 231 copies of data for consumers who have experienced DIY in various fields, and the results are as follows. As expected, it was found that affect intensity positively influenced sense and feel, need for cognition had a positive effect on think, and self-efficacy had a positive effect on act and relate. As expected, it was found that affect intensity had an effect on sense and feel, need for cognition had an effect on think, and self-efficacy had a positive effect on act and relate. And it was confirmed that all DIY experiences had a positive effect on the intention to continue DIY. This study provides theoretical and strategic implications by confirming the influence of personal characteristics of DIY consumers and approaching DIY from the perspective of a comprehensive experience.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. N. D. Kim, M. Y. Jeon, H. E. Lee, J.Y. Lee, S. Y. Kim & J. H. Choi. (2015). Trend korea 2016. Future window
  2. H. Y. Shin. (2015). Newsis(Online). https://newsis.com/ar_detail/view.html?ar_id=NISX20150304_0013513933&cID=10408&pID=10400
  3. C. H. Lee. (2015.06.01.). [Cool Monday] The tree is comfortable to touch...I've become a profession. JoongAng Ilbo. (Online). https://news.joins.com/article/17924001
  4. J. U. Lee & T. K. Lee. (2016). Improving value consumption through the DIY furniture manufacturing experience. Lighting design research, 19(1), 194-212.
  5. T. K. Lee & J. G. Choi. (2014). An Evaluation of the emotional value for social people gained through a DIY furniture making experience. Korea design forum, 43, 209-222.
  6. J. Y. Kim. (2016). Effects of Fashion DIY(Do-It-Yourself) Motivations on Behavioral Intention. Doctoral Degree. Hanyang University, Seoul.
  7. Y. H. Jeong & J. Y. Park. (2019), The Effect of Positive Characteristics of DIY on Healing Effect and Re-Experiential Intention -In terms of healing of experiential consumption and creation-. Korean Consumption Culture Research, 22(3), 1-25.
  8. B. Schmitt. (1999) Experiential Marketing: How to Get Customers to Sense, Feel, Think, Act, and Relate to Your Company and Brands. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  9. M. C. Fanaru. (2015). Specific Aspects of the Promotional Activity on the DIY Market. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series. 24(2), 674-680.
  10. H. Oh, A. M. Fiore & M. Jeoung. (2007). Measuring experience economy concepts: tourism applications. Journal of Travel Research, 46(2), 119-132. DOI : 10.1177/0047287507304039
  11. M. B. Holbrook & E. C. Hirschman. (1982) The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132-140. DOI : 10.1086/208906
  12. S. Shobeiri, L. Rajaobelina, F. Durif & C. Boivin. (2016). Experiential motivations of socially responsible consumption. International Journal of Market Research, 58(1), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2016-007
  13. M. S. Seh, J. U. Yoo & T. S. Rho. (2015). Customer Participation : The Effects of the Perceived Enjoyment on the Product Evaluation in the case of Kit Assembly Process. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 20(1), 67-90.
  14. N. Franke & S. Shah. (2003). How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing among End-Users. Research Policy(January), 32(1), 157-78. DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00006-9
  15. J. G. Beard & M. G. Ragheb. (1983). Measuring leisure motivation. Journal of Leisure Research, 15(3), 219-228. DOI : 10.1080/00222216.1983.11969557
  16. E. K. Foster. (2019), Claims of Equity and Expertise: Feminist Interventions in the Design of DIY Communities and Cultures. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 35(4), 119-131.
  17. E. Diener, R. J. Larsen, S. Levine & R. A. Emmons. (1985). Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1253-1265. DOI : 10.1037/0022-
  18. R. J. Larsen & E. Diener. (1987). Affect intensity as an individual differences characteristic: A review. Journal of Research in Personality, 21(1), 1-39. DOI : 10.1016/0092-6566(87)90023-7
  19. M. Geuens & P. D. Pelsmacker. (1999). Affect intensity revisited: Individual differences and the communication effects of emotional stimuli. Psychology & Marketing, 16(3), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199905)16:3<195::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-Z
  20. D. J. Moore, W. D. Harris & H. C. Chen. (1995), Affect intensity: An individual differences respon ses to advertising appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1086/209442
  21. D. J. Moore & W. D. Harris. (1996). Affect intensity and the consumer's attitude toward high impact emotional advertising appeals. Journal of Advertising, 25(2), 37-50. DOI : 10.1080/00913367.1996.10673498
  22. J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty. (1982). The Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(January), 116-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
  23. K. R. Lord & S. Putrevu. (1997). Advertising-evoked Messages: The Effects of Word Association Set Size, Need for Cognition, and Style of Processing. in Proceeding of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Marketing Division. (pp 69-77). Herbert F. MacKenzie, ed, St. John's, Newfoundland.
  24. S. J. Dollinger. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition, and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 37(2), 99-116. DOI : 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2003.tb00828.x
  25. A. Bandura. (1996). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY:Freeman.
  26. B. Oldenburg, K. Glanz & M. Ffrench. (1999). The application of staging models to the understanding of health behavior change and the promotion of health. Psychology and Health, 14(3), 503-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449908407343
  27. J. D. Moon, (2006). The Influence of Parentification in Childhood and Self-efficacy on Adolescents' Interpersonal Relationship Problems, Master degree, The catholic university of Korea Seoul.
  28. H. C. Kerry & B. H. Sally. (1999). Effects traumatic atints, social support, self-efficacy on adolescents' self health assessments. Westeref fournal of Nursing Research, 21(5), 673-684. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459922044117
  29. C. Chartrand & J. Mcfudden. (1992). Learning as social interaction: inter discrusivity in a teacher and researcher study group. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.
  30. E. Garbarino & M. S. Johnson. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of marketing, 63(2), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251946
  31. Y. H. Jeong. (2010). The study on the factors influencing on the continuous choice of experiential products -Focusing on the experience-related factors and unrelated factors-. Korean Marketing Research, 25(1), 49-80.
  32. W. S. Kim. (2007) The efficient assessment of need for cognition: K-NfC-S. Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 8(1), 127-133. https://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2007.8.1.127
  33. F. Luthans & C. M. Youssef. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33, 321-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300814
  34. R. P. Bagozzi & Y. Yi (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. DOI : 10.1007/BF02723327