Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제79권2호
  • /
  • Pages.199-209
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Feasibility study of buckling-restrained braces with PM-35 steel core

  • Zhao, Chao (Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Structures for Wind Resistance and Vibration Control & School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Chen, Qianqian (Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Structures for Wind Resistance and Vibration Control & School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Zhong, Xingu (Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Structures for Wind Resistance and Vibration Control & School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Zhang, Tianyu (Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Structures for Wind Resistance and Vibration Control & School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Chen, Zhiwen (Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Structures for Wind Resistance and Vibration Control & School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.24
  • 심사 : 2021.05.17
  • 발행 : 2021.07.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The energy dissipation characteristics of core materials greatly influence the working performance of buckling-restrained braces (BRBs), so it is a vital work to develop more excellent energy dissipation core materials. In this research, a series of experimental studies are conducted, including the mechanical properties of PM-35 steels and the working performance of PM-35 BRB specimens, which serve to investigate the feasibility of PM-35 steel as core materials of BRBs. In addition, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) has been conducted to study the sensitivity factors of energy dissipation of PM-35 BRB specimens, especially the pre-force applied on the BRB specimens. According to the results of this research, it can be concluded that the energy absorption efficiency of PM-35 BRBs specimens is much higher than that of BRB specimens with ordinary core materials; the internal pores greatly weaken the yield strength of PM-35 steel and obviously improve the plastic deformation capacity, which makes that PM-35 core materials are able to absorb energy in a lower stress level; pre-force applied on core materials is the key factor governing the energy absorption, and can significantly improve the working performance of BRB specimens with PM-35 core materials.

키워드

과제정보

The research described in this paper is financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (51678235), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2020JJ5195) and Scientific Research Foundation of Hunan Provincial Education Department (CN) (20B218). The supports are gratefully acknowledged.

참고문헌

  1. Bashiri, M. and Toufigh, V. (2020), "Numerical and experimental investigation on a BRB confined with partially carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP)", Eng. Struct., 223, 111150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111150.
  2. Beiraghi, H. (2017), "Earthquake effects on the energy demand of tall reinforced concrete walls with buckling-restrained brace outriggers", Struct. Eng. Mech., 63(4), 521-536. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.63.4.521.
  3. Beiraghi, H. (2018), "Energy demands in reinforced concrete wall piers coupled by buckling restrained braces subjected to nearfault earthquake", Steel Compos. Struct., 27(6), 703-716. http://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.274.6.703.
  4. Beiraghi, H. (2018), "Energy dissipation of reinforced concrete wall combined with buckling-restrained braces subjected to near- and far-fault earthquakes", Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Tran. Civil Eng., 42(4), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0109-0.
  5. Beiraghi, H. (2018), "Near-fault ground motion effects on the responses of tall reinforced concrete walls with buckling-restrained brace outriggers", Scientia Iranica A, 25(4), 1987-1999.
  6. Beiraghi, H. (2019), "Seismic response of dual structures comprised by Buckling-Restrained Braces (BRB) and RC walls", Struct. Eng. Mech., 72(4), 443-454. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.72.4.443.
  7. Beiraghi, H. (2021), "Seismic response of buckling restrained braced frame with strong back system", Ingegneria Seismica, 37(4), 65-81
  8. Beiraghi, H. and Hedayati, M. (2021), "Optimum location of second outrigger in RC core walls subjected to NF earthquakes", Steel Compos. Struct., 38(6), 671-690. http://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.38.6.671.
  9. Beiraghi, H. and Siahpolo, N. (2016), "Seismic assessment of RC core-wall building capable of three plastic hinges with outrigger", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 26(2), e1306. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1306.
  10. Choi, H. and Kim, J. (2009), "Evaluation of seismic energy demand and its application on design of buckling-restrained braced frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., 31(1), 93-112. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.31.1.093.
  11. Deng, K., Pan, P., Nie, X., Xu, X., Feng, P. and Ye, L. (2015), "Study of GFRP steel buckling restraint braces", J. Compos. Constr., 19(6), 04015009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000567.
  12. Dukhan, N., Rayess, N. and Hadley, J. (2010), "Characterization of aluminum foam-polypropylene interpenetrating phase composites: flexural test results", Mech. Mater., 42(2), 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.09.010.
  13. Dusicka, P. ana Tinker, J. (2013), "Global restraint in ultra-lightweight buckling-restrained braces", J. Compos. Constr., 17(1), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000320.
  14. Fan, Z., Zhang, B., Liu, Y., Suo, T., Xu, P. and Zhang, J. (2020), "Interpenetrating phase composite foam based on porous aluminum skeleton for high energy absorption", Polym. Test., 93, 106917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106917.
  15. Fan, Z., Zhang, B., Liu, Y., Suo, T., Xu, P. and Zhang, J. (2021), "Interpenetrating phase composite foam based on porous aluminum skeleton for high energy absorption", Polym. Test., 93, 106917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106917.
  16. Feldshtein, E.E. and Dyachkova, L.N. (2014), "On the properties and tribological behaviors of P/M iron based composites reinforced with ultrafine particulates", Compos. Part B: Eng., 58, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.015.
  17. GB 50011-2010 (2010), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, China Building Industry Press., Beijing.
  18. Gencturk, B., Araki, Y., Kusama, T., Omori, T., Kainuma, R. and Medina, F. (2014), "Loading rate and temperature dependency of superelastic Cu-Al-Mn alloys", Constr. Build. Mater., 53, 555-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.002.
  19. Hu, B., Lv, H.L. and Kundu, T. (2019), "Experimental study on seismic behavior of reinforced concrete frame in primary and middle schools with different strengthening methods", Constr. Build. Mater., 217, 473-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.040.
  20. JGJ101-2015 Specification for Seismic Test of Buildings (2015), China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
  21. Ko, E., Kimura, I., Clark, P., Aiken, I. and Kasai, K. (1999), "Design procedures for buildings incorporating hysteretic damping devices", 68th Annual Convention SEAOC.
  22. Kumar, A. and Ramana, R.G. (2004), "Materials and design development for bipolar/end plates in fuel cells", J. Power Sour., 129, 62-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.11.011.
  23. Lin, S. and Dong, Y. (2018), "Application of steel-magnesium hybrid buckling restrained brace in steel power plant structure", 2017 3rd International Forum on Energy, Environment Science and Materials (IFEESM 2017).
  24. Liu, S. and Li, A. (2018), "Hysteretic friction behavior of aluminum foam/polyurethane interpenetrating phase composites", Compos. Struct., 203, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.004.
  25. Liu, S., Li, A. and Xuan, P. (2019), "Mechanical behavior of aluminum foam/polyurethane interpenetrating phase composites under monotonic and cyclic compression", Compos. Part A-Appl. S, 116, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.10.026.
  26. Liu, S., Li, A., He, S. and Xuan, P. (2015), "Cyclic compression behavior and energy dissipation of aluminum foam-polyurethane interpenetrating phase composites", Compos. Part A-Appl. S, 78, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.07.016.
  27. Miller, D.J., Fahnestock, L.A. and Eatherton, M.R. (2012), "Development and experimental validation of a nickel-titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace", Eng. Struct., 40, 288-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.037.
  28. Mirjavadi, S.S., Forsat, M., Yahya, Y.Z., Barati, M.R., Jayasimha, A.N. and Hamouda, A.M.S. (2020), "Porosity effects on post-buckling behavior of geometrically imperfect metal foam doubly-curved shells with stiffeners", Struct. Eng. Mech., 75(6), 701-711. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.75.6.701.
  29. Nouri, M.D., Hatami, H. and Jahromi, A.G. (2015), "Experimental and numerical investigation of expanded metaltube absorber under axial impact loading", Struct. Eng. Mech., 54(6), 1245-1266. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.6.1245.
  30. Piedrafita, D., Cahis, X., Simon, E. and Comas, J. (2015), "A new perforated core buckling restrained brace", Eng. Struct., 85(15), 118-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.12.020.
  31. Reay, D. and Kew, P. (2006), Heat Pipes, 5th Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington.
  32. Rosa, D.I.H., Hartloper, A., e Sousa, A.D.C., Lignos, D.G., Motavalli, M. and Ghafoori, E. (2021), "Experimental behavior of iron-based shape memory alloys under cyclic loading histories", Constr. Build. Mater., 272, 121712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121712.
  33. Shi, G., Gao, Y., Wang, X. and Zhang, Y. (2018), "Mechanical properties and constitutive models of low yield point steels", Constr. Build. Mater., 175, 570-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.219.
  34. Shi, G., Hu, F. and Shi, Y. (2016), "Comparison of seismic design for steel moment frames in Europe, the United States, Japan and China", J. Constr. Steel Res., 127, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.07.009.
  35. Song, J., Hu, D., Luo, S., Liu, W., Wang, D., Sun, Q. and Zhang, G. (2021), "Energy-absorption behavior of metallic hollow sphere structures under impact loading", Eng. Struct., 226, 111350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111350.
  36. Su, L., Liu, H., Yao, G. and Zhang, J. (2019), "Experimental study on the closed-cell aluminum foam shock absorption layer of a high-speed railway tunnel", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 119, 331-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.012.
  37. Taghipoor, H. and Damghani N.M. (2019), "Experimental and numerical investigation of lattice core sandwich beams under low-velocity bending impact", J. Sandw. Struct. Mater., 21(6), 2154-2177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636218761315.
  38. Taghipoor, H. and Damghani Nouri, M. (2020), "Axial crushing and transverse bending responses of sandwich structures with lattice core", J. Sandw. Struct. Mater., 22(3), 572-598. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636218761321.
  39. Taghipoor, H. and Noori, M.D. (2018), "Experimental and numerical study on energy absorption of lattice-core sandwich beam", Steel Compos. Struct., 27(2), 135-147. http://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.2.135.
  40. Taghipoor, H., Eyvazian, A., Kumar, A.P., Hamouda, A.M. and Gobbi, M. (2020), "Experimental and numerical study of lattice-core sandwich panels under low-speed impact", Mater. Today Pr., 27, 1487-1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.001.
  41. Taghipoor, H., Eyvazian, A., Musharavati, F., Sebaey, T.A. and Ghiaskar, A. (2020), "Experimental investigation of the three-point bending properties of sandwich beams with polyurethane foam-filled lattice cores", Struct., 28, 424-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.082.
  42. Teng, R., Lei, Y.D. and Wang, T. (2013), "An experimental study on mortar-filled buckling-restrained mechanism", Appl. Mech. Mater., 351, 1537-1541. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.351-352.1537
  43. Vladimir, E. and Colm, O.D. (2020), "Architected porous metals in electrochemical energy storage", Curr. Opinion Electrochem., 21, 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2020.02.011.
  44. Wang, B. and Zhu, S. (2018), "Cyclic tension-compression behavior of superelastic shape memory alloy bars with buckling-restrained devices", Constr. Build. Mater., 186, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.047
  45. Wang, C.L., Usami, T., Funayama, J. and Imase, F. (2013), "Low-cycle fatigue testing of extruded aluminium alloy bucklingrestrained braces", Eng. Struct., 46, 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.016.
  46. Yan, Y.X., Hui, L.X., Yu, M., Fu, J. and Dong, L.H. (2013), "Dynamic response time of a metal foam magneto-rheological damper", Smart Mater. Struct., 22(2), 025026. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/2/025026
  47. Yuan, W., Tang, Y., Yang, X. and Wan, Z. (2012), "Porous metal materials for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells - A review", Appl. Energy, 94, 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.073.
  48. Zhu, B.L., Zhou, P., Guo, Y.L., Zhu, J.S. and Pi, Y.L. (2020), "Load resistance and hysteretic response of shuttle-shaped truss-confined BRBs", Eng. Struct., 208, 109599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109599.