대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제59권3호
  • /
  • Pages.341-349
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

단일 치관 수복 시 구강스캐너를 이용한 교합평가 활용 증례보고

A case report of single crown restoration using an intraoral scanner for occlusal evaluation

  • 송준범 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이종혁 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 하승룡 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 최유성 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 최선영 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Song, Jun-Beom (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Ha, Seung-Ryong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Choi, Yu-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Choi, Sun-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.18
  • 심사 : 2021.05.28
  • 발행 : 2021.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

디지털 방식을 이용한 교합평가는 종래의 방식인 교합지와 occlusion foil 등에 비해 기록, 비교, 분석 등이 쉽고 간편하며 객관적 이라는 장점이 있다. 이에 본 증례보고에서는 교합평가에 디지털 기술을 활용하고자 단일 전장관 수복이 필요한 환자에서 구강스캐너(i500, Medit, Seoul, Korea)를 이용하여 매 내원시 교합을 평가하였으며, 비교를 위하여 교합지를 이용한 교합관계 확인과 디지털 교합분석장비(Dental prescale II, GC corporation, Tokyo, Japan)를 이용하여 교합관계를 평가하였다. 치료과정에서 구강스캐너를 이용한 방법과 기존의 교합지를 이용한 방법이 유사한 결과를 보여 향후 임상적으로 유용하게 사용될 수 있을 것으로 사료되었다.

The evaluation of occlusion using digital methods is easier and simpler in terms of recording, comparison, analysis, and objectivity compared to existing methods such as articulating paper and occlusion foil. The purpose of this case report was utilizing the digital method for evaluating occlusion. The occlusion of patient requiring full veneer crown restoration was evaluated using an intraoral scanner (i500, Medit, Seoul, Korea) at every visit. The occlusion was also assessed using conventional articulating paper and a digital occlusal analysis system (Dental prescale II, GC corp., Tokyo, Japan) for comparison. Throughout the treatment process, the intraoral scanner and the conventional articulating paper method showed similar outcomes. The results suggest that the use of digital evaluation system is highly probable in the near future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116:184-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017
  2. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
  3. Real-Voltas F, Romano-Cardozo E, Figueras-Alvarez O, Brufau-de Barbera M, Cabratosa-Termes J. Comparison of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium metal-ceramic crowns fabricated by CAD/CAM techniques and conventional methods at three production stages. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:304-5. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5038
  4. Michelinakis G, Apostolakis D, Tsagarakis A, Kourakis G, Pavlakis E. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:581-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.10.023
  5. De Boever JA, Carlsson GE, Klineberg IJ. Need for occlusal therapy and prosthodontic treatment in the management of temporomandibular disorders. Part I. Occlusal interferences and occlusal adjustment. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:367-79. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00574.x
  6. Tryde G, Frydenberg O, Brill N. An assessment of the tactile sensibility in human teeth. An evaluation of a quantitative method. Acta Odontol Scand 1962; 20:233-56. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356209019772
  7. Hutzen D, Rebau M, Kordass B. Clinical reproducibility of GEDAS--"Greifswald Digital Analyzing System" for displaying occlusal contact patterns. Int J Comput Dent 2006;9:137-42.
  8. Qadeer S, Kerstein R, Kim RJ, Huh JB, Shin SW. Relationship between articulation paper mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:7-12. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.7
  9. Kerstein RB, Radke J. Clinician accuracy when subjectively interpreting articulating paper markings. Cranio 2014;32:13-23. https://doi.org/10.1179/0886963413Z.0000000001
  10. Saad MN, Weiner G, Ehrenberg D, Weiner S. Effects of load and indicator type upon occlusal contact markings. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;85:18-22.
  11. Lee H, Cha J, Chun YS, Kim M. Comparison of the occlusal contact area of virtual models and actual models: a comparative in vitro study on Class I and Class II malocclusion models. BMC Oral Health 2018;18:109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0566-7
  12. Afrashtehfar KI, Qadeer S. Computerized occlusal analysis as an alternative occlusal indicator. Cranio 2016;34:52-7. https://doi.org/10.1179/2151090314Y.0000000024
  13. Fixed prosthodontics faculty counsil. Fixed prosthodontics principles and clinics. 2nd ed. Seoul; Daehan Narae Publishing; 2017. p.47-8.
  14. Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:256-63. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.122014
  15. Silvestri AR Jr, Singh I. Treatment rationale of fractured posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;97:806-10. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0388
  16. Ayuso-Montero R, Mariano-Hernandez Y, Khoury-Ribas L, Rovira-Lastra B, Willaert E, Martinez-Gomis J. Reliability and validity of T-scan and 3D intraoral scanning for measuring the occlusal contact area. J Prosthodont 2020;29:19-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13096
  17. Solaberrieta E, Etxaniz O, Otegi JR, Brizuela A, Pradies G. Customized procedure to display T-scan occlusal contacts. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:18-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.006