DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hyper KANAKO 모형을 이용한 토석류 피해지 분석

Analysis of Debris Flow Affected Area Using Hyper KANAKO Model

  • 강배동 (강원대학교 방재전문대학원) ;
  • 전계원 (강원대학교 방재전문대학원) ;
  • 김영환 (강원대학교 방재전문대학원)
  • Kang, Bae Dong (Graduate School of Disaster Prevention, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Jun, Kye Won (Graduate School of Disaster Prevention, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Young Hwan (Graduate School of Disaster Prevention, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.25
  • 심사 : 2021.03.15
  • 발행 : 2021.03.31

초록

국토의 64%가 산지로 이루어진 우리나라에서는 하절기에 집중되어 있는 태풍과 국지성 호우로 산사태와 토석류와 같은 산지 재해 피해가 빈번하게 발생하고 있다. 연구대상 지역은 2019년 10월 태풍 미탁에 의해 토석류 피해가 발생했던 지역으로 하류부에 위치한 주택이 전파되는 등 시설물에 많은 피해가 발생했다. 본 연구에서는 침식과 퇴적 작용을 고려할 수 있는 Hyper KANAKO 모형을 이용하여 토석류 피해가 발생한 지역에 대해 수치모의를 실시하였으며, 실제 피해 면적과 모형의 분석 결과를 비교하여 모형의 적용성을 검토하였다. 수치모의 결과 대상 지역의 토석류 피해 면적은 53,875 m2로 나타났으며, 최대 유동심은 2.4 m, 평균 유동심은 1.7 m로 분석되었다.

In Korea, where 64% of the soil is mountainous, typhoons and local rains concentrated in the summer season are frequent in mountainous disasters such as landslides and debris flow. The area of study was the area where the damage to the debris flow was caused by typhoon Mitag in October 2019, and all the houses located in the downstream area were damaged. In this study, numerical simulations were conducted on the area where the damage of earth and stone flow occurred using Hyper KANAKO model that can consider erosion and sedimentation, and the applicability of the model was examined by comparing the actual damage area and the analysis results of the model. As a result of the numerical simulation, the damage area of the debris flow in the target area was 53,875 m2, the maximum flow depth was 2.4 m, and the average flow depth was 1.7 m.

키워드

과제정보

This paper work was financially supported by Ministry of the Interior and Safety as Human Resource Development Project in Disaster Management.

참고문헌

  1. Chae, B. G., Liu, K. F., and Kim, M. I. (2010). A Case Study for Simulation of a Debris Flow with DEBRIS-2D at Inje. Korea. The Journal of Engineering Geology. 20(3): 231-242.
  2. Christen, M., Kowalski, J., and Bartelt, P. (2010). RAMMS: Numerical Simulation of Dense Snow Avalanches in Three-dimensional Terrain. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 63(1-2): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.04.005
  3. Jang, C. D., Yoon, Y. H., and Jun, K. W. (2011). Numerical simulation on debris flow disaster area using Kanako-1D. Crisis Emerg Manag Theory Praxis. 7(6): 205-214.
  4. Kim, G. J. (2021). A Study on the Analysis of Debris Flow Disaster Area Using Hyper Kanako Model. M. S. Dissertation. Kangwon National University.
  5. Kim, N. G. (2011). A Study on Transport and Diffusion of Debris Flow with FLO-2D. M. S. Dissertation. Kangwon National University.
  6. Kim, S. E., Paik, J. C., and Kim, K. S. (2013). Run-out modeling of debris flows in Mt. Umyeon using FLO-2D. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 33(3): 965-974. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.3.965
  7. Kim, Y. H. (2017). Sediment Discharge Analysis according to Location Change of Check Dam Using Debris Flow Numerical Model. M. S. Dissertation. Kangwon National University.
  8. Lee, H. J., Tak, W. J., and Jun, K. W. (2015). Simulation of Debris Flow Using RAMMS Model. Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Practice. 11(2): 177-187.
  9. Lim, Y. H. (2017). A Study on the Application of Numerical Simulation to Erosion Control Facility Using KANAKO 2D. Ph. D. Dissertation. Kangwon National University.
  10. Nakatani, K., Wada, T., Satofuka, Y., and Mizuyama, T. (2008). Development of "Kanako 2D (Ver. 2.00)," A Userfriendly One-and two-dimensional Debris Flow Simulator Equipped with A Graphical User Interface. International Journal of Erosion Control Engineering. 1(2): 62-72. https://doi.org/10.13101/ijece.1.62
  11. Peng, S. H. and Lu, S. C. (2013). FLO-2D Simulation of Mudflow Caused by Large Landslide due to Extremely Heavy Rainfall In Southeastern Taiwan during Typhoon Morakot. Journal of Mountain Science. 10(2): 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2510-2
  12. Rickenmann, D., Laigle, D. M. B. W., McArdell, B. W., and Hubl, J. (2006). Comparison of 2D Debris-flow Simulation Models with Field Events. Computational Geosciences. 10(2): 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-005-9021-3
  13. Tak, W. J. (2015). A Study on Transport and Diffusion Range Estimate of Debris Flow using RAMMS. M. S. Dissertation. Kangwon National University.
  14. Takahashi, T. (2001). Process of Occurrence, Flow and Deposition of Viscous Debris Flow. In River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 93-118.
  15. Takahashi, T. (2007). Progress in Debris Flow Modeling. In Progress in Landslide Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 59-77.
  16. Wu, Y. H., Liu, K. F., and Chen, Y. C. (2013). Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the Application of Assessment of Granular Debris Flow Hazards with Case Study. Journal of Mountain Science. 10(2): 293-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2511-1