DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical characteristics of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in young female patients with acute myocardial infarction in Korea

  • Kim, Yongcheol (Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Han, Xiongyi (Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Ahn, Youngkeun (Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Min Chul (Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Sim, Doo Sun (Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Hong, Young Joon (Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Ju Han (Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Jeong, Myung Ho (Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital)
  • Received : 2019.04.05
  • Accepted : 2019.06.10
  • Published : 2021.01.01

Abstract

Background/Aims: We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, characteristics, and clinical outcomes of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) in young female patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: We identified 8,250 patients diagnosed with AMI who underwent coronary angiogram from the Chonnam National University Hospital database, Gwangju, Korea, between November 2005 and September 2017. A total of 148 female patients aged less than 60 years with a history of AMI were retrospectively studied and the characteristics and clinical outcomes were evaluated for all SCAD patients. Results: Among female patients with AMI aged less than 60 years, the prevalence of SCAD was 8.78% (13 of 148). Based on the angiographic classification, type 2 SCAD was most commonly observed on angiograms in 69.2% of the cases (nine of 13), followed by type 3 in 23.1% (three of 13), and type 1 in 7.7% (one of 13). Furthermore, the left anterior descending (LAD) artery was the most commonly affected coronary artery (76.9%, 10 of 13 cases) and the distal segments of the coronary arteries were the most common sites of SCAD (92.3%, 12 of 13). Regarding the clinical outcomes, one of 13 patients experienced repeat revascularization during the following 31 months. Conclusions: The prevalence of SCAD was 8.7%, indicating that SCAD is not rare, among female patients aged less than 60 years with AMI in Korea. Type 2 SCAD was most commonly observed on angiogram. Moreover, the distal portion of the LAD was the segment most commonly affected by SCAD. The long-term clinical outcomes were favorable in patients surviving SCAD.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a grant from Chonnam National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute (BCRI8015) and by a grant from the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI13C1527).

References

  1. Alfonso F, Bastante T. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: novel diagnostic insights from large series of patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:638-641. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001984
  2. Vanzetto G, Berger-Coz E, Barone-Rochette G, et al. Prevalence, therapeutic management and medium-term prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: results from a database of 11,605 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:250-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.10.023
  3. Nakashima T, Noguchi T, Haruta S, et al. Prognostic impact of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in young female patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report from the Angina Pectoris-Myocardial Infarction Multicenter Investigators in Japan. Int J Cardiol 2016;207:341-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.188
  4. Rashid HN, Wong DT, Wijesekera H, et al. Incidence and characterisation of spontaneous coronary artery dissection as a cause of acute coronary syndrome: a single-centre Australian experience. Int J Cardiol 2016;202:336-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.09.072
  5. Mortensen KH, Thuesen L, Kristensen IB, Christiansen EH. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a Western Denmark Heart Registry study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;74:710-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22115
  6. Kim Y, Johnson TW, Akasaka T, Jeong MH. The role of optical coherence tomography in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiol 2018;72:186-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.03.004
  7. Kim Y, Deharo P, Adlam D, Baumbach A, Johnson TW. The role of optical coherence tomography in decision making during the acute phase of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2016;14:6-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.11.010
  8. Kim Y, Jeong MH, Kim MC, et al. Assessment for ambiguous angiographic finding in patient with acute myocardial infarction by optical coherence tomography. Cardiol J 2018;25:536-537. https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.2018.0086
  9. Nishiguchi T, Tanaka A, Ozaki Y, et al. Prevalence of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2016;5:263-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872613504310
  10. Saw J, Aymong E, Mancini GB, Sedlak T, Starovoytov A, Ricci D. Nonatherosclerotic coronary artery disease in young women. Can J Cardiol 2014;30:814-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2014.01.011
  11. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, et al. Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circulation 2012;126:579-588. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105718
  12. Lettieri C, Zavalloni D, Rossini R, et al. Management and long-term prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol 2015;116:66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.039
  13. Saw J, Humphries K, Aymong E, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: clinical outcomes and risk of recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:1148-1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.053
  14. Kim Y, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Results of a 10-year experience in Korea using drug-eluting stents during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry). Am J Cardiol 2018;122:365-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.04.026
  15. Kim Y, Ahn Y, Cho MC, Kim CJ, Kim YJ, Jeong MH. Current status of acute myocardial infarction in Korea. Korean J Intern Med 2019;34:1-10. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.381
  16. Saw J, Mancini GBJ, Humphries KH. Contemporary review on spontaneous coronary artery dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:297-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.034
  17. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51(4 Suppl):5-40. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.51.4.5
  18. Saw J, Aymong E, Sedlak T, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: association with predisposing arteriopathies and precipitating stressors and cardiovascular outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:645-655. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001760
  19. Rogowski S, Maeder MT, Weilenmann D, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: angiographic follow-up and long-term clinical outcome in a predominantly medically treated population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2017;89:59-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26383
  20. Adlam D, Alfonso F, Maas A, Vrints C; Writing Committee. European Society of Cardiology, Acute Cardiovascular Care Association, SCAD study group: a position paper on spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3353-3368. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy080
  21. Hayes SN, Kim ESH, Saw J, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: current state of the science: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018;137:e523-e557. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000564
  22. Buccheri D, Zambelli G, Alfonso F, Cortese B. Pulse on spontaneous coronary artery dissections: experience-based survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1469-1471.
  23. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019;40:87-165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394

Cited by

  1. Comment on “Clinical characteristics of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in young female patients with acute myocardial infarction in Korea” vol.36, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.236
  2. Clinical Study on Characteristics and Risk Factors of Coronary Artery Lesions in Young Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction vol.2021, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5716410
  3. Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection vol.18, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfc.2021.07.015