DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Priorities And Problems In The Development Of Modern Information Technologies In Education

  • Prykhodkina, Nataliia (Department of Pedagogy, Administration and Special Education, University of Education Management) ;
  • Tymoshko, Hanna (Department of pedagogy and methods of teaching history and social disciplines, National University "Chernihiv Collegium") ;
  • Zuieva, Alona (Institute of vocational education and training of National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine) ;
  • Sholokh, Olena (Department of pedagogy and methods of teaching history and social disciplines, National University "Chernihiv Collegium") ;
  • Noskova, Margaryta (Department of Pedagogy and Innovative Education, Lviv Polytechnic National University) ;
  • Lebid, Yuliia (Department of the Music, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts)
  • Received : 2021.06.05
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

The article assesses the functioning of the DE system or a separate educational institution, where it can be carried out on the basis of developed criteria or on a regulatory basis. The assessment was carried out on the basis of a qualitative and quantitative nature by comparing the actual state of affairs with a certain "ideal" (educational standard), which must be defined and used as a kind of benchmark against which the assessment is made. Conducted an assessment based on a regulatory framework that represents an alternative approach. It has been emphasized that the exceptional difficulty in determining the ideal indicators (norms) of the activities of universities, it has been found that the normative approach, in which the activities of traditional and open universities are compared, taking into account the differences in social, cultural and economic conditions, is the most acceptable.

Keywords

References

  1. Gofen A., Blomqvist P. Parental entrepreneurship in public education: a social force or a policy problem? Journal of education policy, 2014, No 29 (4), pp. 546-569. 61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.858275
  2. Grant W. Pressure Groups, Polities and Democracy in Britain. Homel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 2011, 230 p.
  3. Mykhailo Sherman, Yaroslav Martynyshyn, Olena Khlystun, Liubov Chukhrai, Yuliia Kliuchko, Uliana Savkiv. Optimization of the Educational Environment Using Information Technologies. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, VOL.21 No.4, April 2021. pp. 80-83.
  4. Sosenski S. Financial Education for Children: School Savings Programs in Mexico (1925-1945), Historia Mexicana, 2014, No 64 (2), pp. 645 - 662.
  5. Alfred P. Rovai, Linda D. Grooms The relationship of personalitybased learning style preferences and learning among online graduate students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. - 2004. - No16, Issue 1. - pp 30- 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960281
  6. Andrea Santo-Sabato, Marta Vernaleone From the First Generation of Distance Learning to Personal Learning Environments: An Overall Look. ELearning, E-Education, and Online Training. - 2014. - No138. - C. 155-158.
  7. Mason, Robin. Globalizing Education: Trends and Applications. New York: Routledge, 1998. P. 40-41.
  8. Sarnavska, O., Yakovyshyna, T., Kachmar, O., Sherman, M. , Shadiuk, T., & Koberska, T.The Influence of the Culture of the Third Information Revolution on the Formation of Personality in the M. Serres Philosophical Discourse. (2021). Postmodern Openings, 12(1), 241-253. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1/257
  9. Mason, R. Globalising Education: Trends and Applications. London: Routledge, 1998. P. 37.
  10. Burbules, Nicholas C., and Torres, Carlos Alberto. "Globalization and Education: An Introduction ", in, Nicholas Burbules and Carlos Alberto Torres, eds. Globalization and Education. Critical Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 2000. P. 348-349.
  11. Lazorko, O, Zhanna, V., Yahupov, V., Valchuk-Orkusha, O., Melnyk, I., & Sherman, M. (2021). The Safety of Professionalization Subjects in Psychological and Neuropsychological Aspects. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.1/168
  12. Dordick H.S., Wang G. The Information Society: A Retrospective View. Newbury Park - L., - 1993.
  13. Knowledge management e e-learning in ambito sanitario. M. Masoni, M. R. Guelfi, A. Conti, G. F. Gensini, - Milan: Springer, 2011. - pp 65-72.
  14. Mary Webb. Pedagogy with information and communications technologies in transition. Education and Information Technologies. - 2012. - No19, Issue 2. - pp 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9216-x
  15. Priya Sharma, Sebastian Fiedler. Supporting self-organized learning with personal Webpublishing technologies and practices.Journal of Computing in Higher Education. - 2007. - No18, Issue 2. - pp. 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033411
  16. Hasson W., Waterman E. Criteria for the quality of distance education. Higher education in Europe. Volume XXVII, no. 3, 2002.
  17. Rumble G. Universites pour L'ensignement a distance en Europe. Higher education in Europe. 1983. Vol. 8, No 3. P. 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0379772830080302