References
- Thalheim, B.: Conceptual Model Notions-A Matter of Controversy: Conceptual Modeling and its Lacunas. EMISA Int J Concept Model., Vol. 3, 9-27 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18417/emisa.si.hcm.1
- Hartmann, S., Frigg, R.: Scientific Models. In: Sahotra, S. (ed.), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia, vol. 2. Routledge (2005)
- Craik, K.: (1943). The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge University Press
- Spitzer, D.R.: What Is a Concept? Educational Technology 15(7), 36-39 (July 1975)
- Teller, P.: Twilight of the Perfect Model. Erkenntnis 55, 393-415 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013349314515
- Lin K.-P., Shen, C.-Y. Chao, W.S.: Enriching UML from Model Multiplicity to Model Singularity with Structure-Behavior Coalescence. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (2018). DOI: 10.1109/SMC.2018.00340
- Dori, D.: Model-Based Systems Engineering with OPM and SysML. Springer, New York (2016)
- Egyed, A., Medvidovic, N.: A Formal Approach to Heterogeneous Software Modeling. In: Proc. of Formal Aspects of Software Engineering (FASE'00), pp. 178-192 (2000)
- Schutz, J., Uslar, M., Meister, J.: A Case Study Research on Interoperability Improvement in Smart Grids: State of the Art and Further Opportunities. Open Research Europe (1)33, (2021). DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.13313.1
- Isoda, S.: On UML2.0's Abandonment of the Actors-Call-Use-Cases Conjecture. Journal of Object Technology 4(6), 69-80 (2005). DOI: 10.5381/jot.2005.4.6.a6
- Al-Fedaghi, S: Classes in Object-Oriented Modeling (UML): Further Understanding and Abstraction. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security (IJCSNS) 21(5), pp. 139-150 (2021) https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.5.21
- Bryant, L.R.: Onto-Cartography: An Ontology of Machines and Media. Edinburgh University Press (2014)
- Aristotle (Trans. Ross, W.D.): Metaphysics, Book IX. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.9.ix.html
- Genova, G., Llorens, J.: The Emperor's New Use Case. Journal of Object Technology 4(6), 81-94 (2005) https://doi.org/10.5381/jot.2005.4.6.a7
- Jacobson, I., Spence, I., Bittner, K.: USE-CASE 2.0: The Guide to Succeeding with Use Cases. Ivar Jacobson International (2011). https://www.ivarjacobson.com/sites/default/files/field_iji_file/article/use-case_2_0_jan11.pdf
- ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 19505-2:2012 Information Technology - Object Management Group Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML) - Part 2: Superstructure. ISO/IEC (2012)
- Berard, E.V.: Be Careful With "Use Cases." Unpublished document (1996). Accessed 26 May 2021. https://2e0lj12n8kh11jepat23jcv8-wpengine.netdnassl.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/03/BeCarefulWithUseCases.pdf
- Robinson, S.: The Future's Bright, the Future's...Conceptual Modelling for Simulation! Journal of Simulation 1(3), 149-152 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jos.4250026.
- da Silva, A.R.: Rigorous Specification of Use Cases with the RSL Language. In Siarheyeva, A., Barry, C., Lang, M., Linger, H., Schneider, C. (eds.) Information Systems Development: Information Systems Beyond 2020 (ISD2019 Proceedings). Toulon, France: ISEN Yncrea Mediterranee (2019)
- Dijkman, R.M., Joosten, S.M.M.: An Algorithm to Derive Use Case Diagrams from Business Process Models. In: Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications (SEA), pp. 679-684 (2002)
- Aguirre-Urreta, M.I., Marakas, G.M.: The Empirical Literature Comparing Entity Relationship and Object-Oriented Modeling Techniques, While Vibrant, Has Often Yielded Equivocal Findings. ACM SIGMIS Database: 39(2), 9-32 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1364636.1364640
- Houy, C., Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Understanding Understandability of Conceptual Models-What Are We Actually Talking About? In: Atzeni, P., Cheung, D., Ram, S. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7532, pp 64-77. Berlin, Springer (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34002-4_5
- Valaski, J., Reinehr, S., Malucelli, A.: Evaluating the Expressiveness of a Conceptual Model Represented in OntoUML and UML. In: Proc. of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), vol. 2, pp. 263-270 (2017)