DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the effectiveness of SW-based maker education in online environment: From the perspective of self-efficacy, learning motivation, and interest

비대면 온라인 환경에서 SW기반 메이커교육의 효과성 비교: 자기효능감, 학습동기, 흥미도의 관점에서

  • 김태령 (서울녹번초등학교) ;
  • 한선관 (경인교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2021.04.21
  • Accepted : 2021.05.20
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

This study compares Online SW-based maker education in terms of self-efficacy, learning motivation, and interest after applying differently according to blended learning strategies. First, a SW maker program for blended learning was developed and applied as a live seminar-type class including real-time interactive and a support-providing class consisting of online content and Q&A. As a result of comparing the differences between students according to the two strategies divided into pre- and post- survey, in the self-efficacy part, there was a significant difference in the positive efficacy and the overall part, and in the learning motivation part, the live seminar form was significantly higher in the confidence part. In the interest part, the support-providing form showed a significantly higher average in the instrumental interest and nervous part. In order to maintain the effect of maker activities like existing face-to-face situations in Online learning, it is necessary to increase sharing time between students, an integrated learning environment, and sufficient provision of exploration time and learning materials.

본 연구는 SW기반 메이커교육을 비대면 온라인 환경에서 블렌디드 러닝 전략에 따라 다르게 적용한 후 자기효능감, 학습동기, 흥미도의 관점에서 비교한 것이다. 먼저 온라인 교육을 위한 SW 메이커 프로그램을 개발하고 이를 실시간 쌍방향을 포함하는 라이브세미나형 수업과 온라인콘텐츠와 질의응답으로 이루어진 지원제공형 수업으로 각각 적용하였다. 사전, 사후로 나누어 두 전략에 따른 학생들의 차이를 비교한 결과 자기효능감 부분에서는 라이브세미나 형태가 긍정적 효능감과 전체 평균 변화 부분에서 유의미한 차이가 있었고, 학습동기 부분에서는 라이브세미나 형태가 자신감 부분에서 유의미하게 높았으며 흥미 부분에서는 지원제공형 형태가 도구적 흥미와 긴장 부분에서 유의하게 높은 평균을 보여주었다. 비대면 온라인 학습에서 기존 대면상황과 같은 메이커 활동의 효과를 유지하기 위해서는 학생 간 공유 시간 증대와 통합적인 학습 환경, 탐색시간과 학습 자료의 충분한 제공이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Blikstein, P., Martinez, S. L., Pang, H. A. (2016). Meaningful making: projects and inspirations for fab labs+ makerspaces. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
  2. Do Jaewoo(2020). An Investigation of Design Constraints in the Process of Converting Face-to-face course into Online Course. Journal of Education & Culture, 26(2), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.24159/JOEC.2020.26.2.153
  3. Go Hak-Neung, Lee Young-Jun(2019). A Study on Maker education program using 3D modeling., In Proceedings of Korean Association Of Computer Education, 23(2), 43-46.
  4. Jeon Soo-Jin(2016). The Effect of Flipped Learning on Learning Motivation in Software Education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 20(5), 433-442. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.20.4.433
  5. Jeong Hae-woon(2018). Seoul maker education, preparing for the 4th industrial revolution, http://webzine-serii.re.kr/Seoul maker education preparing for the 4th industrial revolution/, withdrawn on April 20, 2021.
  6. K. Peppler and S. Bender. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time, Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), .22-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500306
  7. Kang Bong-Suk, Jung Young-mi(2019). Development, Implementation, and Analysis of a Maker Education Program in School Library: A Case Study of Daegu S High School. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Infromation Science, 53(2), 117-137.
  8. Kim Jae-Chun(2017). The current status and meaning of the maker movement and overseas promotion of maker education (Park Joo-yong), Education Policy Forum 2017, 290, 27-32. MZ2017-290 (MZ).
  9. Kim Jae-Hwi, Kim Dong-Ho(2016). Development of Physical Computing Curriculum in Elementary Schools for Computational Thinking, Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 20(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2016.20.1.69
  10. Kim Jong-Doo(2019). Direction of Maker Education and School Education, Journal of the Edutainment, 1(1), 1-14.
  11. Kim Kap-soo(2020). An Analysis of Effect of Online Education on software Education for pre-service elementary teacher. Journal of The Korean Assosciation of Information Education, 24(6), 643-652. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.6.643
  12. Kim Soon-shik(2019). The Effect of Maker Class Emphasizing Small Group Discussion and Debate on Elementary School Students' Science Learning Motivation and Scientific Attitude. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 12(1), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2019.12.1.54
  13. Kim Sung-In, Kim Jin-Soo, Kang Sung-Joo, Kim Tae-Young, Yoon Ji-Hyun(2019). Development and Application of Middle School Students Maker Education Program using Arduino based on Design Thinking. Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Educators, 44(1), 162-189. https://doi.org/10.35140/kiiedu.2019.44.1.162
  14. Kwak Young-Sun, Kim Chan-Jong, Lee Yang-Rak, Jeong Deuk-Sil(2006). Investigation of Elementary and Secondary Students' Interest in Science. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(3), 260-268.
  15. Kwon Hoi-Lym, Moon Eun-Kyung, Park Inn-Woo(2015). A meta-analysis on effects of blended learning in Korea. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 21(3), 333-359.
  16. Lee Chang-Youn, Hong, Hun-Gi(2018). A Case Study of Chemistry Inquiry R&E Program based on Maker Activity. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(18), 131-154.
  17. Lee Young-Kwang, Ji Eun-Gu(2017). Development of self-efficacy scale. Korean Journal of Social Science, 36(1), 5-31.
  18. Lim Eun-jung, Kwon Su-Mi(2020). A Study on the Status of Non-face-to-face Music Online Remote Classes. Korean Journal of Arts Education, 18(3), 165-184.
  19. Lim Ta-Mi(2019). Development of a Blended Learning Based SW Maker Education Program. Journal of Knowledge Information Technology and Systems(JKITS), 14(3), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.34163/JKITS.2019.14.3.004
  20. Oh Ii-Ga(2021). Development of Online Maker Education Model for Chinese Universities. Hanyang University Dept of Educational Technology. Master's Thesis.
  21. Park Kwang-Ryeol(2019). Approach of Software Education based on Makers' Activities in Practical Arts Subject, Journal of Korean practical arts education, 32(4), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.24062/kpae.2019.32.4.279
  22. Regalla, L. (2016). Developing a maker mindset. Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments, 1, 257. NY: Routledge.
  23. Seage, S. J., Turegun, M. (2020). The Effects of Blended Learning on STEM Achievement of Elementary School Students. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.728