정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제25권3호
  • /
  • Pages.511-525
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초·중등 교육과정 온라인지원시스템의 사용자 중심의 디자인 가이드라인 개발 및 검증

Development and Verification of User-centered Design Guidelines on Online Support System for Curriculum at primary/secondary schools

  • 차현진 (순천향대학교 기초공통교양학부) ;
  • 황윤자 (단국대학교 공학교육혁신센터) ;
  • 노은희 (한국교육과정평가원)
  • 투고 : 2021.03.25
  • 심사 : 2021.05.10
  • 발행 : 2021.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 초·중등 교육과정을 지원하기 위한 온라인시스템을 대상으로 사용자 친화적인 경험과 편의성을 제공하기 위한 디자인 가이드라인을 개발하는데 있다. 이를 위해 선행연구 및 해외 교육과정 온라인지원시스템에 대한 우수사례를 분석하였다. 또한, NCIC와 고교학점제 사이트를 중심으로 74명의 모니터단 설문 조사를 통해 UX/UI 사용성 문제와 요구를 도출하였다. 해외사례 분석과 모니터단 설문 결과를 바탕을 도출된 디자인 가이드라인에 대한 초안을 바탕으로 전문가 델파이를 실시하여 타당성을 확보하였다. 본 연구에서는 교육과정에 관련된 과업을 수행하는 온라인지원시스템에 일반적으로 적용될 수 있는 디자인 가이드라인을 도출함으로써, 현재 서비스되고 있는 시스템의 개선 방향을 제시하고 향후 개발될 시스템의 디자인의 방향을 제시하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

The purpose of this study is to develop a design guideline to provide user-friendly experience and convenience for the online support system for the curriculum at primary/secondary schools. To achieve the objective, best practices of overseas on the online support system for curriculum as well as prior research were analyzed. In addition, UX/UI usability problems and needs were derived through a survey of 74 professionals and teachers who are monitoring NCIC and high school credit system sites. Based on the analysis of best practices of overseas and survey results, the draft of the design guideline was derived, and Delphi method was conducted by experts to re- vise the design guidelines and evaluate their validity. This study is meaningful in that it suggests the direction of improvement of the system currently being serviced and the direction of the design of the system to be developed in the future, by providing design guidelines that can be generally applied to online support systems that perform tasks related to the curriculum.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 순천향대학교 학술연구비 지원으로 수행하였음.

참고문헌

  1. Alsumait, A., & Al-Osaimi, A. (2010). Usability Heuristics Evaluation for Child Elearning Applications, Journal of Software, 5(6), 654-661.
  2. Cha, H.J. & So, H.J. (2021). Online learning in K-12 Schools amid Covid-19 in South Korea: Challenges and opportunities, In D., Burgos, A., Tlili, A., Tabacco, (2021). Radical solutions for education in a crisis context: Covid-19 as an opportunity for global learning, Lecture notes in educational technology, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
  3. Cha, H.J. & Hwang, Y.J. (2017). Development and validation of heuristics for usability improvements on web-based diagnostic assessment management system for primary-middle schoolers, Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(6). 675-690. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.6.675
  4. Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62, 107-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  5. KERIS (2020). White paper, Ministry of Education, KERIS.
  6. Kim, E.J. (2017). A study on the difficulties and improvements for the organization and implementation of school based curriculum, Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 27(2), 275-301. https://doi.org/10.21024/PNUEDI.27.2.201706.275
  7. Kim, J.U. (2012). HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION Foundations, Kyungido: Angraphics
  8. Kim, J.S. (2018). A study on restructuring high school curriculum to adopt the credit system, KICE(Korea Institute Of Curriculum & Evaluation), RRC 2018-8, DOI: https://doi.org/10.23000/TRKO201900002206
  9. Kim, S.H., Yoon, Y.S., Noh, E.H., Park, S.Y. (2021). Analysis of the online support systems for curriculum organization and implementation in Korea, The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 24(1), 29-52. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2021.24.1.29
  10. Lim, C.L,, Song, H.D., Lee, Y.K,, Lee. Y.T. (2009) A study on the developing and applying digital textbook platform usability evaluation tools, Educational Technology Research, 25(4), 125-155.
  11. Lim, Y.N. (2016). A case study on teacher support for realization of competency-based education: Focused on the New Zealand curriculum development and implementation, The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 32(3), 59-88. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2016.32.3.59
  12. Mtebe, J. S. (2015). Heuristics for Evaluating usability of learning management systems in Africa, IIMC International Information Management Corporation.
  13. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, Academic Press Limited, London.
  14. Nelsen, J.. (1994). 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. Retrieved 19, April, 2020, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/ (2020. 4. 19. 검색).
  15. Nielsen, J. (1995). 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design, Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
  16. Nielsen, J.. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Retrieved 19, April, 2020, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030825.html (2020. 4. 19. search).
  17. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Method, Sage Publications: London, UK
  18. Penha, M. (2014) Heuristic Evaluation of Usability - a Case study with the Learning Management Systems (LMS) of IFPE, International Journal of Humanities and social science, 4(6), 295-303.
  19. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2008) Interaction Design: beyong human-computer interaction, 2nd Edition, Glasgow: Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  20. Sim, G., Read, J.C., Cockton, G. (2009). Evidence based Design of Heuristics for Computer Assisted Assessment, IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 204-216.
  21. Seo, Y.S. (2007). Development of usability evaluation tools for web-based learning site. PhD thesis.
  22. Squires, D. and J. Preece, (1999). Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating for learning, usability and the synergy between them. Interacting with Computers, 11. 467-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00063-0
  23. Australian Curriculum. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/
  24. Australian NSW. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/home
  25. Ireland NCCA. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ncca.ie/en/
  26. Denmark Ug. DenmarkUddannelsesGuiden. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ug.dk/
  27. Denmark Emu. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://emu.dk/grundskole
  28. Kanada BC's Course Curriculum. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca