Journal of Korean Physical Therapy Science (대한물리치료과학회지)

Korean Physical Therapy Science (대한물리치료과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of motor learning in children with cerebral palsy: A systemic review

뇌성마비 아동의 운동학습 효과 체계적 고찰

  • Kim, Jung-Hyun (Department of Integrated Alternative Medicine, Shinhan University)
  • 김정현 (신한대학교 통합대체의학과)
  • Received : 2021.03.27
  • Accepted : 2021.05.21
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Children with cerebral palsy have difficulty acquiring motor skills through motor learning due to lack of motor planning of the central nervous system and musculoskeletal dysfunction. Motor learning is the acquisition or modification of movements with the aim of developing skilled movements and behaviors. Cerebral palsy improve motor function through motor learning, and effective motor learning mainly depends on practice parameters such as learning feedback. Therefore, we investigate the effect of motor learning in children with cerebral palsy and try to present the possibility of clinical application. Design: A systemic review. Methods: Research papers were published from Jan, 2010 to Dec, 2020 and were searched using PubMed and Medline. The search terms are 'task specific training' OR 'motor learning' OR 'feedback(Mesh term)' OR 'goal activity' AND 'cerebral palsy(Mesh term)'. A total of eight papers were analyzed in this study. The paper presented the quality level based on the research evidence, and also presented PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) scores to evaluate the quality of design studies in randomized clinical trials. Results: The results showed that motor learning coaching in children with cerebral palsy improved motor function in post and follow up tests. Also, self-control feedback of motor learning is more effective than external control feedback. 100% external control feedback of motor learning is effective in the acquisition phase and 50% external feedback of motor learning is effective in the retain phase. Conclusion: These results suggest that it will be an important data for establishing evidence on the effect of motor learning arbitration methods in children with cerebral palsy to develop clinical applicability and protocols.

Keywords

References

  1. 이진, 전혜림. GMFM과 ICF의 하위영역 기능이 ICF의 하위영역 활동과 참여문제에 미치는 영향 비교. 대한물리치료과학회지 2019;26(3):15-22. https://doi.org/10.26862/jkpts.2019.12.26.3.15
  2. 전혜림, 정영아, 이병희. 동작관찰훈련이 양하지마비 뇌성마비 아동의 뇌활성에 미치는 영향. 대한물리치료과학회지 2020;27(1):18-25. https://doi.org/10.26862/jkpts.2020.06.27.1.18
  3. 정은정, 한상진, 이병희. 머리-목 굽힘 기반 몸통 안정화 운동이 경직성 뇌성마비 아동의 대동작기능과 앉은 자세 정렬에 미치는 효과. 대한물리치료과학회지 2019;26(2):61-73. https://doi.org/10.26862/jkpts.2019.09.26.2.61
  4. Arbesman M, Scheer J, Lieberman D. Using AOTA's critically appraised topic (CAT) and critically appraised paper (CAP) series to link evidence to practice. OT practice 2008;13(12):18-22.
  5. Bar-Haim S, Harries N, Nammourah I, et al. Effectiveness of motor learning coaching in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2010;24(11):1009-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215510371428
  6. Batshaw ML, Pellegrino L, Roizen NJ. Children with disabilities. 6th ed. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing Co.; 2007.
  7. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52:1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  8. Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, et al. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005;47(8):571-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001216220500112X
  9. Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, Foley NC, et al. The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad scale in stroke rehabilitation literature. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58(7):668-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.002
  10. Burtner PA, Leinwand R, Sullivan KJ, et al. Motor learning in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: feedback effects on skill acquisition. Dev Med Child Neurol 2014;56(3):259-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12364
  11. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, de Medeiros FL, et al. Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year-old children. Res Q Exerc Sport 2008;79(3):405-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2008.10599505
  12. Ferrari M. Observing the observers: Self-regulation in the observational learning of motor skills. Dev Rev 1996;16(2):203-40. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1996.0008
  13. Fairbrother JT, Laughlin DD, Nguyen TV. Self-controlled feedback facilitates motor learning in both high and low activity individuals. Front Psychol 2012;3:323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00323
  14. Flinn NA, Radomski MV. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p.283-97.
  15. Garvey MA, Giannetti ML, Alter KE, et al. Cerebral palsy: New approaches to therapy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2007;7(2):147-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-007-0010-x
  16. Gordon AM, Magill RA. Motor learning: Application of principles to pediatric rehabilitation. In Campbell SK, Palisano RJ, Orlin MN. Physical therapy for children. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO Elsevier; 2012. p.151-74.
  17. Hemayattalab R. Effects of self-control and instructor-control feedback on motor learning in individuals with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil 2014;35(11):2766-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.006
  18. Hemayattalab R, Arabameri E, Pourazar M, et al. Effects of self-controlled feedback on learning of a throwing task in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil 2013;34(9):2884-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.05.008
  19. Hemayattalab R, Rostami LR. Effects of frequency of feedback on the learning of motor skill in individuals with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil 2010;31(1):212-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.09.002
  20. Jang SH, Lee J. The Effect of Ability to Balance Sensory Integration Exercise for Adults. J Korean Phys Ther Sci 2017;24(2):36-44. https://doi.org/10.26862/jkpts.2017.09.24.2.36
  21. Kirschenbaum DS. Self-regulation and sport psychology: Nurturing an emerging symbiosis. J Sport Psychol 1984;6(2):159-83. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.6.2.159
  22. Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, et al. Single blind randomised controlled trial of GAME (Goals - Activity - Motor Enrichment) in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil 2016;55:256-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.04.005
  23. Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, et al. Optimising motor learning in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy: a pilot study. BMC Pediatr 2015;15:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0347-2
  24. Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C, et al. Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Aust J Physiother 2002;48(1):43-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60281-6
  25. Mutsaarts M, Steenbergen B, Bekkering H. Anticipatory planning deficits and task context effects in hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Exp Brain Res 2006;172(2):151-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0327-0
  26. Rosenbaum P. Cerebral palsy: what parents and doctors want to know. BMJ 2003;326(7396):970-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7396.970
  27. Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl 2007;109:8-14.
  28. Kim E, Yang S, Lee N, et al. Effects of Random Visual and Auditory Stimulation on Walking of Healthy Adults. J Korean Phys Ther Sci 2019;26(1):35-44. https://doi.org/10.26862/jkpts.2019.06.26.1.35
  29. Lee J, Yu TH, Seo WH. The Study of Functional Movement in Healthy adults. Jo Korean Phys Ther Sci 2017;24(1):49-58.
  30. Peacock J. Cerebral palsy: Perspective on disease and illness. Capstone Press; 2000.
  31. Sabari JS, Kane L, Flanagan SR, et al. Constraint-induced motor relearning after stroke: A naturalistic case report. Arch of Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(4):524-8. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.21857
  32. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychol Bull 1984;95(3):355-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355
  33. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Inc.; 2005.
  34. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach. Human Kinetics; 2008.
  35. Shea CH, Wulf G. Schema theory: A critical appraisal and reevaluation. J Mot Behav 2005;37:85-101. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.37.2.85-102
  36. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
  37. Steenbergen B, Gordon AM. Activity limitation in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: evidence for disorders in motor planning. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006;48(9):780-3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162206001666
  38. Valvano J. Activity-focused motor interventions for children with neurological conditions. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2004;24:79-107. https://doi.org/10.1300/J006v24n01_04
  39. Kumban W, Amatachaya S, Emasithi A, et al. Effects of task-specific training on functional ability in children with mild to moderate cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil 2013;16(6):410-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2013.772672
  40. Winstein CJ, Schmidt RA. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1990;16:677-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.677
  41. Wu W, Magill RA. Allowing learners to choose: Self-controlled practice schedules for learning multiple movement patterns. Res Q Exerc Sport 2011;82(3):449-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599777
  42. Young DE, Schmidt RA. Augmented kinematic feedback for motor learning. J Mot Behav 1992;24:261-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1992.9941621