References
- Baccarne, B., Schuurman, D., Mechant, P., & De Marez, L. (2014). The role of urban living labs in a smart city. Proceedings of XXV ISPIM Innovation Conference, 1-16. Retrieved November 1, 2020 from https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/5646684/file/5646725.pdf
- Bergvall-Kareborn, B., Eriksson, C. I., Stahlbrost, A., & Svensson, J. (2009). A milieu for innovation: defining living labs. Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium. Retrieved October 20, 2020 from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1004774/FULLTEXT01.pdf
- Buhr, K., Federley, M., & Karlsson, A. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability in suburbs in need of modernization and social uplift. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview958
- Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., Marvin, S., McCormick, K., van Steenbergen, F., & Voytenko Palgan, Y. (2016). Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion Environmental Sustainability, 22(2016), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003
- Cellina, F., Castri, R., Diethart, M., Hoflehner, T., Da Schio, N., & Dijk, M. (2018). Constraints on upscaling and social inclusion in smart city living lab experiments and ways to anticipate them: lessons from four "smarter" labs. Proceedings of Open Living Lab Days 2018, ENoLL, 11-25.
- Cho, Y., & Oh, M. (2019). Smart City Living Lab Promotion Strategy (Report No. Research Support 2019-001). Land & Housing Institute.
- Chang, H., & Kim, K. (2019). Policy directions for citizen-led smart city based on living lab. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 22(3), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.21189/JKUGS.22.3.3
- Chroneer, D., Stahlbrost, A., & Habibipour, A. (2019). Urban living labs: towards an integrated understanding of their key components. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1224
- Coenen, T., van der Graaf, S., & Walravens, N. (2014). Firing up the city - a smart city living lab methodology. Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, 3(4), 1-11.
- Cuomo, F., Ravazzai, S., & Bertolini, L. (2020). Transformative urban living labs: towards a circular economy in Amsterdam and Turin. Sustainability, 12(18), 7651-7670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187651
- De Ceuvel. (n.d.a). Organization. Retrieved January 23, 2020 from https://deceuvel.nl/en/organisatie
- De Ceuvel. (n.d.b). Sustainability. Retrieved January 23, 2020 from https://deceuvel.nl/en/about/sustainable-technology/
- ENoLL. (n.d.). About Us. Retrieved October 19, 2020 from https://enoll.org/about-us/
- Eurbanlab. (2012). Eurbanlab Flyer. Eurbanlab. Retrieved February 5, 2020 from https://descargas.five.es/archivos/Eurbanlab_Flyer.pdf
- Evans, J., & Karvonen, A. (2012). Living laboratories for sustainability: exploring the politics and epistemology of urban transition. In Bulkeley, H., Castan Broto, V., Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (Eds.). Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. London: Routledge, 126-141.
- Gemeente Eindhoven. (2017). Routeplanner Samenspraak Projectontwikkelaars. Gemeente Eindhoven.
- Giulietti, M., Le Coq, C., Willems, B., & Anaya, K. (2019). Smart Consumers in the Internet of Energy: Flexibility Markets and Services from Distributed Energy Resources. Centre on Regulation in Europe.
- Han, K., & Lee, J. (2019). A Study on deriving key characteristics and factors of urban living lab. Proceedings of 2019 S/S Academic Conference of the Urban Design Institute of Korea. Urban Design Institute of Korea. 363-372.
- Hotel Asile Flottant. (n.d.). De Ceuvel. Retrieved January 30, 2020 from https://www.asileflottant.com/De-ceuvel
- Jo, J. (2020). Living lab key components and their effects for the smart urban-regeneration projects - in-depth case study on the living lab in Goyang city. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design, 21(5), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.38195/judik.2020.10.21.5.51
- JPI Urban Europe. (2015). Transition Towards Sustainable and Liveable Urban Futures: The Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda of Urban Europe. JPI Urban Europe.
- Juujarvi, S., & Lund, V. (2016). Enhancing early innovation in an urban living lab: lessons from Espoo, Finland. Technology Management Review, 6(1), 17-26.
- Juujarvi, S., & Pesso, K. (2013). Actor roles in an urban living lab: what can we learn from Suurpelto, Finland? Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview742
- Karvonen, A., & van Heur, B. (2014). Urban laboratories: experiments in reworking cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(2), 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12075
- Kim, L. (2020). Principles and application of nature-based solutions (NBS). Water for Future, 53(3), 8-20.
- Lee, E., & Park, E. (2019). A preliminary study on the application of living lab in smart urban regeneration project. Proceedings of Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 39(1), 692-695.
- Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nystrom, A. (2012). Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview602
- Maciulyte, E., Cioffi, M., Zappia, F., Duce, E., Ferrari, A., de Mendoca, M., Loriga, G., Suska, P., Paz, B. L. V., Zangani, D., & Bult, P. (2018). Business Models & Financing Strategies. UNaLab.
- McCormick, K., & Hartmann, C. (2017). The Emerging Landscape of Urban Living Labs: Characteristics, Practices and Examples. GUST.
- Menny, M., Voytenko Palgan, Y., & McCormick, K. (2018). Urban living labs and the role of users in co-creation. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives on Science and Society, 27(1), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.14
- Metabolic. (2013). Cleantech Playground. Metabolic.
- Metabolic. (2018). Amsterdam's Circular Living Lab: What Organisations Can Learn from De Ceuvel. Metabolic. Retrieved 23 December, 2020 from https://www.metabolic.nl/news/amsterdams-circular-living-lab-organisations-learn-from-de-ceuvel/
- Nesi, P., & Paolucci, M. (2018). Supporting living lab with life cycle and tools for smart city environments. Proceedings of the 24th International DMS Conference on Visualization and Visual Languages, DMSVIVA, Retrieved January 17, 2020 from http://ksiresearchorg.ipage.com/seke/dms18paper/dms18paper_19.pdf
- Nesti, G. (2018). Co-production for innovation: the urban living lab experience. Policy and Society, 37(3), 310-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1374692
- Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., & Loorbach, D. (2013). Urban transition labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50(2013), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
- Park, J., Park., J, & Nam, K. (2019). A study on the activation of citizen participation through living lab. Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association, 35(3), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.22669/KRSA.2019.35.3.033
- Postmes, L., & van Dinter, M. (2020). UNaLab NBS in the City of Eindhoven. ENoLL. Retrieved November 17, 2020 from https://vimeo.com/413029522
- Sarkilahti, M., (2020). UNaLab NBS in the City of Tampere. ENoLL. Retrieved November 13, 2020 from https://vimeo.com/401028205
- Schliwa, G., & McCormick, K. (2018). Living labs: users, citizens and transitions. In Evans, J., Karvonen, A., & Raven, R. (Eds.). The Experimental City. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 163-178.
- Scholl, C., & Kemp, R. (2016). City labs as vehicles for innovation in urban planning processes. Urban Planning, 1(4), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i4.749
- Schuetze, C. F. (2014, November 19). Building a comm unity on polluted land. The New York Times. Retrieved January 11, 2020 from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/20/business/energy-environment/ex-shipyard-in-amsterdam-houses-shops-and-offices.html
- Song, W., Jeong, S., Han, K., Seong, J., & Kim, J. (2017). Technology commercialization model of public R&D based on living labs. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 20(2), 458-486. https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2017.06.20.2.458
- Song, W., & Seong, J. (2019). Socio-technical system transition approach and transformative regional innovation: exploratory study. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 22(6), 1004-1029. https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2019.12.22.6.1004
- Tamminen, P. (2017). Urban sustainability in Vuores, a new housing development in Tampere. Proceedings of FIG Working Week 2017. Retrieved January 20, 2020 from https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2012/papers/ts05d/TS05D_tamminen_5717.pdf
- UNaLab. (2020). Innovation Vouchers to Encourage Citizens' NBS Initiatives in Tampere. Retrieved January 6, 2021 from https://unalab.eu/en/news/innovation-vouchers-encourage-citizens-nbs-initiatives-tampere
- UNaLab. (n.d.a). Our Cities. Retrieved December 13, 2020 from https://unalab.eu/en/our-cities
- UNaLab. (n.d.b). City-Tampere. Retrieved November 13, 2020 from https://unalab.eu/en/project-partners/city-tampere
- United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN.
- United Nations. (2017). New Urban Agenda. UN.
- van Dinter, M., & Habibipour, A. (2019). Co-creation Workshops Report. UNaLab.
- van Winden, W., Oskam, I., Schrama, W., & van Dijck, E. (2016). Organising Smart City Projects: Lessons learned from Amsterdam. HvA/Eburon.
- Veeckman, C., & van der Graaf, S. (2015). The city as living laboratory: empowering citizens with the Citadel toolkit. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(3), 6-17. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview877
- Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J., & Schliwa, G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123(2016), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053
- Wendling, L., Rinta-Hiiro, V., Jermakka, J., Fatima, Z., Rudenhausen, M. C., Ascenso, A., Miranda, A. I., Roebeling, P., Martins, R., & Mendonca, R. (2019). Performance and Impact Monitoring of Nature-Based Solutions. UNaLab.