Acknowledgement
This research was supported by a grant (NRF-2019R1A2C2004746) of the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Korean Government (MEST). It was also supported by a faculty research grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2018 (6-2018-0066).
References
- Griffiths CT, Fuller AF. Intensive surgical and chemotherapeutic management of advanced ovarian cancer. Surg Clin North Am 1978;58:131-142 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(16)41440-4
- Hoskins WJ, McGuire WP, Brady MF, Homesley HD, Creasman WT, Berman M, et al. The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:974-979; discussion 979-980 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70090-7
- Eisenkop SM, Friedman RL, Wang HJ. Complete cytoreductive surgery is feasible and maximizes survival in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol 1998;69:103-108 https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1998.4955
- Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM, Friedman RL, Lin WC, Pisani AL, Perticucci S. Relative influences of tumor volume before surgery and the cytoreductive outcome on survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol 2003;90:390-396 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00278-6
- Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Gostout BS, Jones MB, Stanhope CR, Wilson TO, et al. Aggressive surgical effort and improved survival in advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:77-85 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000192407.04428.bb
- Chi DS, Eisenhauer EL, Lang J, Huh J, Haddad L, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)? Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:559-564 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.051
- Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363:943-953 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908806
- Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, Jayson GC, Kitchener H, Lopes T, et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2015;386:249-257 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62223-6
- Nelson BE, Rosenfield AT, Schwartz PE. Preoperative abdominopelvic computed tomographic prediction of optimal cytoreduction in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:166-172 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1993.11.1.166
- Meyer JI, Kennedy AW, Friedman R, Ayoub A, Zepp RC. Ovarian carcinoma: value of CT in predicting success of debulking surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:875-878 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.165.4.7676985
- Bristow RE, Duska LR, Lambrou NC, Fishman EK, O'Neill MJ, Trimble EL, et al. A model for predicting surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma using computed tomography. Cancer 2000;89:1532-1540 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20001001)89:7<1532::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-A
- Jung DC, Kang S, Kim MJ, Park SY, Kim HB. Multidetector CT predictors of incomplete resection in primary cytoreduction of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Eur Radiol 2010;20:100-107 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1533-0
- Jung DC, Kang S, Kim SC, Kim JW, Nam JH, Ryu SY, et al. Use of complex surgical procedures, patterns of tumor spread, and CA-125 predicts a risk of incomplete cytoreduction: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG-3022). Gynecol Oncol 2013;131:336-340 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.07.110
- Ferrandina G, Sallustio G, Fagotti A, Vizzielli G, Paglia A, Cucci E, et al. Role of CT scan-based and clinical evaluation in the preoperative prediction of optimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective trial. Br J Cancer 2009;101:1066-1073 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605292
- Axtell AE, Lee MH, Bristow RE, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Raman S, et al. Multi-institutional reciprocal validation study of computed tomography predictors of suboptimal primary cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:384-389 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.07.7800
- Qayyum A, Coakley FV, Westphalen AC, Hricak H, Okuno WT, Powell B. Role of CT and MR imaging in predicting optimal cytoreduction of newly diagnosed primary epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005;96:301-306 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.06.054
- Dowdy SC, Mullany SA, Brandt KR, Huppert BJ, Cliby WA. The utility of computed tomography scans in predicting suboptimal cytoreductive surgery in women with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2004;101:346-352 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20376
- Byrom J, Widjaja E, Redman CW, Jones PW, Tebby S. Can pre-operative computed tomography predict resectability of ovarian carcinoma at primary laparotomy? BJOG 2002;109:369-375 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01216.x
- Fagotti A, Ferrandina G, Fanfani F, Ercoli A, Lorusso D, Rossi M, et al. A laparoscopy-based score to predict surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1156-1161 https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.08.021
- Brun JL, Rouzier R, Uzan S, Darai E. External validation of a laparoscopic-based score to evaluate resectability of advanced ovarian cancers: clues for a simplified score. Gynecol Oncol 2008;110:354-359 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.04.042
- Fagotti A, Ferrandina G, Fanfani F, Garganese G, Vizzielli G, Carone V, et al. Prospective validation of a laparoscopic predictive model for optimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:642.e1-e6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.052
- Kang S, Park SY. To predict or not to predict? The dilemma of predicting the risk of suboptimal cytoreduction in ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2011;22 Suppl 8:viii23-viii28 https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr530
- Son HM, Kim SH, Kwon BR, Kim MJ, Kim CS, Cho SH. Preoperative prediction of suboptimal resection in advanced ovarian cancer based on clinical and CT parameters. Acta Radiol 2017;58:498-504 https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185116658683