DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules with Macrocalcification and Rim Calcification Based on Ultrasound Patterns

  • Hwa Seon Shin (Department of Radiology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital) ;
  • Dong Gyu Na (Department of Radiology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Wooyul Paik (Department of Radiology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • So Jin Yoon (Department of Radiology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Hye Yun Gwon (Department of Radiology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Byeong-Joo Noh (Department of Pathology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Won Jun Kim (Department of Endoclinology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2020.03.30
  • Accepted : 2020.11.03
  • Published : 2021.04.01

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association of macrocalcification and rim calcification with malignancy and to stratify the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules with macrocalcification and rim calcification based on ultrasound (US) patterns. Materials and Methods: The study included a total of 3603 consecutive nodules (≥ 1 cm) with final diagnoses. The associations of macrocalcification and rim calcification with malignancy and malignancy risk of the nodules were assessed overall and in subgroups based on the US patterns of the nodules. The malignancy risk of the thyroid nodules was categorized as high (> 50%), intermediate (upper-intermediate: > 30%, ≤ 50%; lower-intermediate: > 10%, ≤ 30%), and low (≤ 10%). Results: Macrocalcification was independently associated with malignancy in all nodules and solid hypoechoic (SH) nodules (p < 0.001). Rim calcification was not associated with malignancy in all nodules (p = 0.802); however, it was independently associated with malignancy in partially cystic or isoechoic and hyperechoic (PCIH) nodules (p = 0.010). The malignancy risks of nodules with macrocalcification were classified as upper-intermediate and high in SH nodules, and as low and lower-intermediate in PCIH nodules based on suspicious US features. The malignancy risks of nodules with rim calcification were stratified as low and lower-intermediate based on suspicious US features. Conclusion: Macrocalcification increased the malignancy risk in all and SH nodules with or without suspicious US features, with low to high malignancy risks depending on the US patterns. Rim calcification increased the malignancy risk in PCIH nodules, with low and lower-intermediate malignancy risks based on suspicious US features. However, the role of rim calcification in risk stratification of thyroid nodules remains uncertain.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Medical Research Promotion Program through the Gangneung Asan Hospital funded by the Asan Foundation (2020IC001).

References

  1. Ha EJ, Lim HK, Yoon JH, Baek JH, Do KH, Choi M, et al. Primary imaging test and appropriate biopsy methods for thyroid nodules: guidelines by Korean Society of Radiology and National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Korean J Radiol 2018;19:623-631  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.623
  2. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2016;26:1-133  https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0020
  3. Shin JH, Baek JH, Chung J, Ha EJ, Kim JH, Lee YH, et al. Ultrasonography diagnosis and imaging-based management of thyroid nodules: revised Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology consensus statement and recommendations. Korean J Radiol 2016;17:370-395  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.370
  4. Gharib H, Papini E, Garber JR, Duick DS, Harrell RM, Hegedus L, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Medical Guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules--2016 update. Endocr Pract 2016;22:622-639  https://doi.org/10.4158/EP161208.GL
  5. Russ G, Bonnema SJ, Erdogan MF, Durante C, Ngu R, Leenhardt L. European Thyroid Association guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules in adults: the EU-TIRADS. Eur Thyroid J 2017;6:225-237  https://doi.org/10.1159/000478927
  6. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland LL, Teefey SA, et al. ACR thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14:587-595  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.046
  7. Frates MC, Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Kunreuther E, Contreras M, Cibas ES, et al. Prevalence and distribution of carcinoma in patients with solitary and multiple thyroid nodules on sonography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:3411-3417  https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-0690
  8. Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH, Na DG, Baek JH, Lee YH, et al. Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation--multicenter retrospective study. Radiology 2008;247:762-770  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2473070944
  9. Lu Z, Mu Y, Zhu H, Luo Y, Kong Q, Dou J, et al. Clinical value of using ultrasound to assess calcification patterns in thyroid nodules. World J Surg 2011;35:122-127  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0827-3
  10. Seo H, Na DG, Kim JH, Kim KW, Yoon JW. Ultrasound-based risk stratification for malignancy in thyroid nodules: a four-tier categorization system. Eur Radiol 2015;25:2153-2162  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3621-7
  11. Na DG, Baek JH, Sung JY, Kim JH, Kim JK, Choi YJ, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system risk stratification of thyroid nodules: categorization based on solidity and echogenicity. Thyroid 2016;26:562-572  https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0460
  12. Zheng Y, Xu S, Kang H, Zhan W. A single-center retrospective validation study of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. Ultrasound Q 2018;34:77-83  https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000350
  13. Middleton WD, Teefey SA, Reading CC, Langer JE, Beland MD, Szabunio MM, et al. Multiinstitutional analysis of thyroid nodule risk stratification using the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;208:1331-1341  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17613
  14. Wang Z, Zhang H, Zhang P, He L, Dong W. Diagnostic value of ultrasound-detected calcification in thyroid nodules. Ann Acad Med Singap 2014;43:102-106  https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V43N2p102
  15. Na DG, Kim DS, Kim SJ, Ryoo JW, Jung SL. Thyroid nodules with isolated macrocalcification: malignancy risk and diagnostic efficacy of fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy. Ultrasonography 2016;35:212-219  https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.15074
  16. Seo HS, Lee DH, Park SH, Min HS, Na DG. Thyroid follicular neoplasms: can sonography distinguish between adenomas and carcinomas? J Clin Ultrasound 2009;37:493-500  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.20625
  17. Kobayashi K, Fujimoto T, Ota H, Hirokawa M, Yabuta T, Masuoka H, et al. Calcifications in thyroid tumors on ultrasonography: calcification types and relationship with histopathological type. Ultrasound Int Open 2018;4:E45-E51  https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0591-6070
  18. Kuo TC, Wu MH, Chen KY, Hsieh MS, Chen A, Chen CN. Ultrasonographic features for differentiating follicular thyroid carcinoma and follicular adenoma. Asian J Surg 2019;43:339-346  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.04.016
  19. Kim BM, Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Hong SW, Son EJ, et al. Sonographic differentiation of thyroid nodules with eggshell calcifications. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1425-1430  https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2008.27.10.1425
  20. Park M, Shin JH, Han BK, Ko EY, Hwang HS, Kang SS, et al. Sonography of thyroid nodules with peripheral calcifications. J Clin Ultrasound 2009;37:324-328  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.20584
  21. Malhi HS, Velez E, Kazmierski B, Gulati M, Deurdulian C, Cen SY, et al. Peripheral thyroid nodule calcifications on sonography: evaluation of malignant potential. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019;213:672-675  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20799
  22. Hoang JK, Middleton WD, Farjat AE, Teefey SA, Abinanti N, Boschini FJ, et al. Interobserver variability of sonographic features used in the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;211:162-167  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.19192
  23. Malhi H, Beland MD, Cen SY, Allgood E, Daley K, Martin SE, et al. Echogenic foci in thyroid nodules: significance of posterior acoustic artifacts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:1310-1316  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11934
  24. Zayadeen AR, Abu-Yousef M, Berbaum K. JOURNAL CLUB: retrospective evaluation of ultrasound features of thyroid nodules to assess malignancy risk: a step toward TIRADS. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;207:460-469  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.15121
  25. Ha SM, Chung YJ, Ahn HS, Baek JH, Park SB. Echogenic foci in thyroid nodules: diagnostic performance with combination of TIRADS and echogenic foci. BMC Med Imaging 2019;19:28 
  26. Hiromura T, Tanaka YO, Nishioka T, Tomita K. Serous psammocarcinoma of the ovary: CT and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31:490-492  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rct.0000243450.48857.3a
  27. Ayala C, Healy GB, Robson CD, Vargas SO. Psammomatous calcification in association with a benign thyroglossal duct cyst. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:241-243 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.129.2.241